The topic of step 11 at a Sponsorship through the 12 steps workshop in London, UK
OK,
thank
you.
To
set
the
tone
for
the
meeting,
I
will
read
an
extract
from
A
Vision
for
you,
page
164.
Our
book
is
meant
to
be
suggestive
only.
We
realize
we
know
only
a
little.
God
will
constantly
disclose
more
to
you
and
to
us.
Ask
Him
in
your
morning
meditation
what
you
can
do
each
day
for
the
man
who
is
still
sick.
The
answers
will
come
if
your
own
house
is
in
order,
but
obviously
you
cannot
transmit
something
you
haven't
got.
See
to
it
that
your
relationship
with
Him
is
right
and
great
events
will
come
to
pass
for
you
and
countless
others.
This
is
the
great
fact
for
us,
and
the
topic
of
tonight's
meeting
is
working.
Step
11
with
the
Sponsee
and
Tim
will
share
anything
between
30
and
45
minutes
on
the
topic,
after
which
the
floor
will
be
open
for
questions
rather
than
the
typical
sharing.
And
with
that,
I
want
to
hand
over
to
Tim,
Semi
alcoholic.
Very
glad
to
be
here.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
for
listening.
I
was,
I
just
be
talking
to
myself,
Step
11.
I
think
is,
is
is
tricky
for
all
sorts
of
reasons.
I
knew
someone
around,
oh,
28
years
ago
in
a,
a
who
is,
who
is
very
good,
is
about
8
years
sober
at
the
time,
and
who
very
spiritual
and
did
all
sorts
of
remarkable
spiritual
things
and
went
on
retreats.
And
whenever
he
shared,
it
was
always
about
that,
you
know,
the
spiritual
path
and
all
of
these
wonderful
things
he
was
doing
and,
and
books
and
courses
and
enlightenment
and
all
that
sort
of
stuff.
But
he
drifted
away
from
a
A,
which
he
sort
of
saw
as
a,
a
starting
point
for
the
spiritual
journey.
And
he,
as
it
were,
graduated
and
poor
old
thing
end
up
and
ends
up
in
the
drink.
And
I
think
that
did
for
him.
So
he
had
some
other
medical
conditions
which
weren't
helped
by
the
drinking.
And
that's
not
an
unusual,
that's
not
an
unusual
story.
People
who
are
sober
longer
than
me
have
said
that
in
a
a
we
lose
as
many
people
out
of
the
top,
you
know,
if
not
into
career
and
romance
and
money
and
materialism,
into
spiritual
paths
and
religion.
And
I,
I
have
seen
that
happen
and
it
is
wonderful.
Until
of
course,
you
have
a
little
drink
and
then
then
you
know,
so
much
for
the
chanting
at
that
point
or
whatever
else
you're
doing.
So
there's
a,
there's
a
great
difficulty
there,
but
it's
very
attractive,
all
of
that
sort
of
stuff.
And
I
find
it
very
attractive.
And
I've
gone
a
long
way
in,
in
the
direction
of
religion,
spirituality.
But
in
my
case,
the
cart
very
easily
comes
before
the
horse
and
I
can
forget
what
it's
about.
And
the
other
end
of
the
scale
as
well.
When
you've
got,
you
know,
there's
very
good
sponsees
who
want
to
do
everything
they
do,
want
to
do
everything
right,
they
want
to
do
the
program
right
and
they
have
a
problem.
They
say,
right,
I'm
going
to
I'm
going
to
up
my
prayer
and
meditation.
And
again,
the
danger
can
be
can
be
that
one
amplifies
the
self
absorption,
absorb
absorption
with
one's
own
spiritual
path.
Now,
of
course,
Step
11
is
a
bit
of
a
damp
squib
really
compared
to,
you
know,
gurus
and
retreats
and
Goa
and
Nepal
or
whatever
these
destinations
are.
There
was
a
wonderful,
it
was
I,
I
think,
you
know,
there's
fake
Ladybird
books.
Like
there
were
those
children's
books
introducing
children
to
various
aspects
of
the
world.
Well,
Ladybird
books
and
they,
they've
done
a
number
of,
of
parody
ones
in
the
last
few
years.
And
one
of
them
was
the
Ladybird
Book
of
Meditation,
and
there
was
a
picture
and
it
was
always
sort
of
fake.
1970s
illustrations
remember
the
sort
of
style
of
illustrations
of
children's
books
in
the
1970s.
And
it
was,
I
won't
get
the
caption
right,
but
it
was
something
like
Susie
was
very
upset
to
discover
a
Buddhist
centre
opening
round
the
corner
in
Chiswick
when
she
hoped
her
boyfriend
was
going
to
pay
for
a
trip
to
Thailand
for
her.
And
The
thing
is
about
step
11
as
it
was
written
in
the
and
the
big
book
and
there's
a
bit
of
a,
a
history
there.
So
it
cut
a,
a
comes
for
better
or
for
worse,
from
a
form
of
so-called
1st
century
Christianity,
which
is
non
doctrinal,
but
very
definitely
Christian.
So
non
doctrinal
in
that,
you
know,
if
you're
whether
you
are
sort
of
high
Anglican
or
an
Episcopalian.
They
weren't
too
bothered.
I
think
they
they
raised
eyebrows
a
little
bit
at
Catholics,
but
but
the
point
was
is
to
have
a
direct
relationship
with
God,
to
get
direct
guidance.
So
it
was
not
about
exalted
emotional
states
or
or
states
of
consciousness.
It
was
about
getting
direct,
concrete,
clear
guidance
about
what
to
do.
And
so
step
11
is
very
disappointing
if
you're
on
a
spiritual
path
because
it
says
praying
only
only
for
knowledge
of
God's
will
for
us
and
the
power
to
carry
that
out.
And
so
when
directing
and
also
the
other
thing
about,
so
it's
one
end
of
the
scale
you've
got
is
very,
very
keen
responses
that
that
want
to
invest
a
lot
in
their
their
spiritual
life.
And
then
you've
got
people
at
the
other
end
of
the
scale
that
that
you
know,
wouldn't
know
the
higher
power
if
it
stood
up
in
their
suit
and,
and
don't
really
care
for
any
of
that
woo
woo
stuff.
They,
they
was
a
rather
poor
scorn
on
it.
And
being
a
bit
of
a
chameleon,
I,
I
flipped
myself
between
those
two,
two
extremes.
So
one
minute
very
attractive
and
the
other
minute
rather
sort
of
off
put
by
it
all.
And
so
at
the
other
end
of
the
extreme,
other
end
of
the
scale,
you've
got
sponsees
who
don't
want
anything
to
do
with
spirituality
in
the
ordinary
sense,
the
word
in
in
the
language,
and
they're
not
interested
in
meditation
in
its
current
meaning.
And
I
think
the
antidote
for
for
both
categories
and
therefore
for
everyone
in
between.
It
seems
to
stick
very,
very
closely
to
the
wording.
So
sought
to
improve
our
conscious
contact
with
God.
Now
I'll
come
to
the
word,
improve
that
because
people
make
a
great
play
of
it.
Improve
our
conscious
contact
with
God,
praying
only
for
knowledge
of
His
bill
for
us
and
the
power
to
carry
that
out.
Now
it
talks
instead
of
10
about
having
entered
the
world
of
the
Spirit
and
it
talks
in
step
12
about
having
a
spiritual
awakening.
And
the,
the,
the,
the,
the
most
important
fact
of
our
lives
is,
is
the,
is
the
consciousness
of
the
presence
of
God
and
all
that
sort
of
stuff.
And
as
I
said,
I
think
in
an
earlier,
earlier
week,
consciousness,
conscious
contact
with
God,
I
don't
think
all
it
can
be
conscious
contact
with
a
being.
Sometimes
people
sense
a
being,
but
it
doesn't
need
to
be
that.
It
means
contact
in
my
consciousness.
So
when
I'm
aware
either
of
the
knowledge
of
God's
will
for
me,
when
I'm
suddenly
clear
about
what
I
need
to
do
in
a
situation
and
it
just
comes
as
a
bolt
from
the
blue,
or
when
I
feel
sufficient
resources
to
do
that,
I
literally
have
conscious
contact
with
God,
or
at
least
with
the
commodities
that
come
from
God.
So
this
can
all
be
pitched
in
a
way
which
is
palatable.
So
people
that
have
a
problem
with
God
and
religion
and
spirituality,
it's
very,
very
practical.
It's
it's
about
the
business
end
of
the
relationship
with
God
about
what
what
God
wants
me
to
do
today.
Bob
D
very
good
on
all
of
this.
If
you
can
catch
I
I
can't.
I
don't
know
which
talk,
but
I've
heard
him
say
it
on
a
number
of
occasions
about
the,
about
the,
the
dangers
of
going
too
far
into
the
other
spiritual
paths
and
saying
when
he
gets
off
track,
he
he
remembers
he
has
to
do
that
other
stuff
in
addition
to
not
say
that.
I'm
not,
I'm
not
saying
don't
do
it
if
you
want
to
go
and
do
whatever
religious
or
spiritual
things
and
knock
yourself
out.
But
one
does
it
in
addition
to
step
11
in
the
book,
not
instead
of
and
it
comes
under
the
heading
of
There
are
many
useful
books
also
suggestions
about
these
may
be
obtained
from
one's
priest,
minister
or
a
rabbi.
And
be
quick
to
see
where
religious
people
are
right.
And
there
are
other
points
in
the
big
book
where
it
does
point
you
towards,
you
know,
go
and
find,
go
and
rejoin
your
local
religious
or
spiritual
community,
right?
I
think
that's
absolutely
right,
that
the
core
of
it
is
this
knowledge
of
God's
will
for
me
and
the
power
to
carry
that
out.
So
what
do
I
do
with
sponsee?
Well,
first
of
all,
I
explain
all
that
which
is
the
the
premise
behind
it
and
all
the
other
stuff
which
does
alter
your
consciousness
and
raise
your
consciousness
and
establish
a
sense
of
safety
and
identity
in
God
or
purpose
in
God
or
valuing
God
is
all
very,
very
good.
But
I've
got
a
friend
in
Bristol
say
his
name
because,
well,
I
shouldn't
really,
that's
why.
But
he
sticks
very,
very
closely
to
this
notion
and
he's
sober
a
very
long
time,
very
closely
to
this
notion
of
God
being
good
orderly
direction.
It's
a
very
British
way
of
looking
at
it,
I
think.
Good
orderly
direction
as
a
chap
in
Somerset,
I
know
sort
of
4550
years
sober
who's
who's,
who's
very
similar,
very,
very
practical,
doesn't
talk
about
God
at
all.
But
my
friend
in
Bristol
reports
him
as
saying
whenever
he
sees
this
chap
in
Somerset,
his
car
is
always
full
of
newcomers.
And
I
think
that's
the
best
demonstration
of
spirituality
is
people
are
on
the
phone
the
whole
time.
My
friend
Melody,
when
I
was
new,
whenever
you
said
Melody,
can
we
go
for
a
coffee?
She
said,
well,
no.
I'm
meeting
a
new
Comer
outside
Ponce
Street.
I'm
meeting
a
newcomer
outside
the
world
MPI.
She's
always
meeting
a
newcomer.
There's
spiritual
thing
you
can
do.
I
think
is
is
meet
or
talking
to
a
newcomer.
So
step
11
in
the
book
is
is
very
much
about
so
if
the
substance
of
the
day
is
step
12,
so
high
consciousness
service
within
AA,
service
outside
AA,
our
step
11
is
the
means.
So
as
soon
as
someone
has
committed
to
the
program,
however
in
whatever
rudimentary
way
I
give
them,
I've
got
a
little
little
note
that
I
get
and
say
this
is
what
a
daily
program
looks
like
and
it
includes,
it
includes
step
11,
basically
the
instructions
from
from
page
86
to
88.
So
they're
doing
this
right
from
the
beginning,
I
guess
them
to
get
a
little
coterie
of
pals
together.
I
direct
them
towards
some
particular
people
who
I
sponsor,
who
I
know
a
safe
pair
of
hands
for
this
and
say
you
what
you
want
to
do
is
you
want
to
run
through
your
day,
your
previous
24
hours
with
someone,
do
a
review.
If
they
want
you
to
send
it,
you
send
the
review.
So
you
do
a
review
and
you
talk
it
through
with
someone
else.
Let
the
corrective
measures
from
there
flow
into
the
plan
for
the
next
day.
Do
a
plan
for
the
day,
run
it
past
a
grown
up
and
to
run
it
past
someone
who
is
going
to
be
actively
feeding
back
and
interfering
with
it.
It's
no
good
having
someone's
just
going
to
say,
Oh
yes,
marvellous
to
everything
when
it's
not
because
people
don't
they
I'm
I
didn't
know
how
to
live.
I
had
no
clue.
Dumb
one,
dumb
idea
after
another.
Someone
described
history
as
one
damn
thing
after
another.
That's
what
my
plans
for
the
day
look
like
one
damn
thing
after
another.
So
I
needed
people
to
say
that's
how
really,
really
bad
idea.
So
I
encourage
people
to
find
a
group
of
because
what?
What
you
don't
want
with
your
sponsees
is
for
them
to
become
dependent
on
you
or
to
see
you
as
some
kind
of
sole
authority.
There's
a
tradition
in
AAA.
Friend
of
mine
in
New
York
was
it.
I'm
sure
I've
told
this
story.
I've
got
limited
numbers.
So
it's
like
a
merry
go
round.
All
the
horses
come
round
again
eventually.
Do
you
just
have
to
sit
and
watch
it
for
long
enough?
Friend
in
New
York
was
at
a
meeting
and
the
secretary
didn't
show
up
or
the
chair
didn't.
Sherlock,
the
person
who's
going
to
be
taking
the
meeting
is
sober
and
said,
you
know,
Steve,
can
you
take
the,
can
you
take
the
meeting
tonight?
He
said,
I'll
just
check
with
my
sponsor.
And
he
went
over
the
road
and
went
over
and
asked
his
sponsor
if
he
could
do
this,
if
this
was
allowed
and
and
the
sponsor
gave
him
a
sort
of
papal
blessing
and
then
he
went
and
took
the
meeting.
So
I
established
Tim,
we've
kind
of
lost
you.
Has
everybody
else
lost
him?
Yeah,
just
as
he
was
describing
the
chair
disappearing
as
well,
frozen.
Yeah,
this
is
a
unique
situation.
So
we
should
now
ask
our
sponsors
what
to
do?
Yeah,
I
think
he's
lost
connection.
Oh,
OK,
you'll
see
he's
disappeared.
Maybe
he'll
rejoin,
hopefully.
Right.
Where
did
I
lose
you?
April
bless,
papal
blessing.
April
blessing.
So
he
gave
us
papal.
Luckily
I've
got
2
Internet
connections
so
we're
we're
good
eventually.
Anyway,
the
point
is
what
you
don't
want
is
to
become
like
the
sole
source,
the
only
person
they're
talking
to.
They've
got
to
be
talking
to
a
whole
bunch
of
people
and
getting
to
know
a
bunch
of
people.
Often
they,
you
know,
you
give
them
a
half
a
dozen
people
to
talk
to,
they
discover
they
like
them
more
and
immediately
switch
to
them
as
sponsors.
This
is
good.
If
there's
someone
better,
they
should
be
with
that
person.
You
don't
want
to
hug
everyone
to
yourself.
This
is
also
great
for
your
own
sponsees
because
it
gives
them
an
opportunity
to
be
trained
on
people
without
having
like
the
full
responsibility.
So
people
get
used
to
what
the
practice
looks
like
without,
you
know,
formally
having
these
as,
as
permanent
sponsors.
And
it
shares
the
work
around
the
group
really,
because
if
you're
sober
a
long
time,
you're
just
going
to
get
asked
a
lot.
So
I
get
people
to
work
with
them,
evening
review
and
their
morning
planning
for
the
day,
which
must
be
integrated.
So
the
corrective
measures
you
need
to
flow
into
the
next
morning's
planning.
I
get
them
to
run
through
that
with
some
people,
find
the
people
it
works
well
with,
and
then
come
to
me
with
any
headlines
every
day.
What
what
I'm
discovering
at
the
moment,
I
sort
of
stopped
doing
this
for
a
while,
but
I
think
it's
the
best
thing.
While
I
may
change
my
mind,
but
I
think
the
best
thing
is
with
anyone
in
the
first
few
months
is
to
be
calling
you
daily
and
it
doesn't
need
to
be
a
protracted
conversation.
What
I
get
people
to
do
is
to
call
daily
with
whatever
step
work
they've
completed
in
the
last
24
hours,
or
call
daily
and
call
daily
with
whatever
particular
instruction
I've
given
someone
recently,
which
works
very
well.
What's
your
biggest
internal
problem
of
the
last
24
hours?
What's
your
biggest
external
problem
of
the
last
24
hours?
And
that's
very
helpful
because
it
means
you
can
feed
them
solutions
right
from
the
beginning
because
this
is
the,
you
know,
the
spiritual
life
is
not
a
theory.
We
have
to
live
it.
Some
people
will
come
to
you
to
do
a
sort
of
academic
run
through
the
program,
but
they
want
everyone
to
stay
out
of
their
lives.
And
their
lives
are
a
catastrophe.
And
what
you
don't
want
is
to
sort
of
wait
while
these,
you
know,
catastrophes
are
unfurling
around
them,
like
wondering
why
they're
so
crazy
when
it's
because
no
one
the
crap
that's
going
on.
So
I
find
that
everything
if
I'm
doing
that
what
you
know,
what's
the
biggest
drama,
internal
drama,
external
drama
or
the
last
24
hours,
which
you
process
already
talked
to
a
couple
of
people
about.
So
by
the
time
it's
processed
with
a
couple
of
people,
you
get
a
much
cleaner
version
than
the
kind
of
raw
sewage
which
you
know,
comes
out
of
people
when
the
situation
is
completely
fresh.
If
you
have
fresh
raw
sewage,
I'm
not
sure
that's
appropriate
metaphor,
but
anyway,
you
get
the
point.
By
the
time
they've
talked
to
a
couple
of
people,
it's
clearer
already,
and
then
you
can
really
provide
helpful
direction.
They
know
what's
happened.
They've
they've
worked,
they
figured,
figured
out
at
least
the
basics.
So
you're
integrating
the
program
with
their
life
right
from
the
beginning,
but
you're
not
the
sole
authority.
There's
a
whole
group
of
people.
If
you've
got
five
people
telling
them
you're
crazy,
you're
approaching,
that
you
know
this
is
not
helping,
then
they'll
believe
it.
If
it's
one
person,
it's
them
against
you
and
I've
had
a
lot
of
them
against
me
against
the
sponsee
in
the
past
when
they
that
does
not
happen,
but
there's
a
whole
group
of
people
they're
talking
to
who
have
got
their
heads
screwed
on.
They
don't
think
that
it's
one
person
against
them.
It's
the
power
of
the
group
and
but
it
works
through
there
being,
you
know,
lots
of
1
to
one
interactions
regarding
the
content
of
the
evening
and
the
morning
routines.
If
people
want
to
do
their,
you
know,
their
readings
and
their
breathing
and
the
chanting
and
all
that,
obviously
I'm
not
going
to
disturb
any
of
that.
But
the
morning
has
to
contain
the
plan
for
the
day.
And
I
get
people
at
the
beginning
to
do
pretty
strict
plans
of
the
day.
And
this,
I
think
this
is
so
important,
particularly
the
ones
who
are
slippery
in
terms
of
the
the
not
drinking
bit
of
the
program.
Because
very
often
what
people
will
do
is
leave
huge
chunks
of
time
in
which
the
thoughts
spontaneously
then
occurs
to
them
to
drink.
And
of
course
it
isn't
spontaneously
carrying
a
specifically
left
a
four
hour
gap.
Between
work
and
having
to
be
home
in
order
to,
I'll
just
figure
something
out
in
the
moment,
knowing
subconsciously
but
that
when
they
get
to
that,
oh,
I
feel
like
a
drink
now
and
then
they
go
and
drink.
I
need
my
schedule
when
I
was
new
was
nailed
down
for
me
so
that
I
knew
at
every
moment
of
the
day
exactly
where
I
was
supposed
to
be
and
there
wasn't.
I
couldn't
have
squeezed.
You
couldn't
have
squeezed.
You
couldn't
have
squeezed
a
cigarette
paper
in
between
the
various
appointments
in
my
schedule,
let
alone
a
full
blown
relapse.
My
first
sponsor,
Doug,
said
that
the
worst
thing
for
an
alcoholic
is
unstructured
free
time.
So
I
get
people
with
the
morning
meditation
to
focus
very
much
on
a
solid
plan
for
the
day.
And
sometimes
I've
reviewed
these
and
that
people
write
the
most
extraordinary
things.
I
can't
tell
you
all
the
wonderful
things
because
in
case
that
person's
listening
to
this
tape,
but
people
can
make
a
meal
out
of
ordinary
everyday
things.
I'll
just
leave
it
at
that.
Like
stuff
which
would
take
you
or
me
8
minutes,
4
minutes,
2
minutes.
There's
like
a
whole
hour
set
aside,
you
know,
so
that
the,
the
plans
are
very
revealing
about
what's
actually
going
on
for
them.
The
other
thing
about
the
daily
call,
which
so
in
the
morning,
by
the
time
they
get
to
you,
hopefully
they've
done
a
nice
early
morning
meeting,
lots
of
seven
A
at
636-6637
AM
meetings
around,
particularly
in
continental
Europe.
There
are,
if
you're
in
the
UK,
you
can
get
to
8:00
AM
meetings
in
Europe,
which
are
7:00
AM
in
the
UK.
There
are.
So
hopefully
they,
by
the
time
they
speak
to
you
at
around
9:00,
they've
been
to
a
meeting,
they've
gone
through
their
review
from
the
night
before,
they've
done
a
plan
for
the
day.
They've
run
it
past
a
couple
of
people.
Then
you
can
really
add
value
as
a
sponsor
on
the
top
of
all
of
that.
Also
the
other
thing
I
find
with
this
daily
calling
people
are
this,
this
is
like
this
is
kind
of
dog
psychology
thing.
People
are
much
more
vulnerable
in
the
morning
in
that
I
don't
mean
in
terms
of
woundable,
I
mean
they're
kind
of
not
with
it
enough
to
conceal
what's
going
on.
By
the
time
they
got
to
the
evening,
they've
been
performing
for
12
hours
and
they're
these,
you
know,
perfect
representations
of
what
someone
should
be
in
the
morning.
People
are
just
aren't
with
it
enough
to
cover
their
tracks
and
listen
to
what
people
say
and
how
they
say.
It's
super
revealing.
It's
not
what
they
it's
the
things
they
inadvertently
say.
It's
the
language.
It's
the
language
they
use,
which
fields,
what's,
what's
really
going,
going
on,
and
that
provides
the
material
for
the
conversation
most
of
the
time.
I
mean,
one
thing
which
I've
had
in
it
is
one
particular
person,
if
they're
listening,
yeah,
if
you're
listening
and
you
recognize
yourself,
you're
not
the
only
one.
It's
not
all
about
you.
Some
of
us,
a
very
common
topic
is
about
discipline
with
the
program.
And
it
does
indeed
in
step
11,
talk
about
God
will
discipline
us.
But
when
when
I've
noticed
when
people
say
I
need
more
discipline,
the
problem
is
a
lack
of
enthusiasm.
Because
when
you're
enthusiastic
about
something,
you
don't
need
discipline.
And
it's
just
like
the
drinking.
I
didn't
need
discipline
to
drink
every
day
because
I
was
enthusiastic
about
it.
So,
so
someone,
you
know,
and
it,
I,
I
get,
I
think
someone
says
it
about
once
a
week.
Yeah,
I
need
to
be
more
disciplined
about
this.
And
of
course,
that
won't
work.
Absolutely
won't
work.
Because
if
you,
if
you
could
muster
the
discipline,
you
would
have
done
it
already.
It's
not
about
discipline
when
people
don't
realize
they're
gonna
reveal
anything
by
saying
I
have
no
idea
because
it's
an
aside
and
it
looks
like
it
looks
like
it's
the
right
thing
to
say.
So
listen,
I,
I
try
and
listen
very,
very
careful.
I
read
between
the
lines
in
those
conversations
with
the
Evening
Review.
You
go
to
meetings,
we'll
talk
about
doing
their
Step
10s
and
they
did
this
long,
long
rehash
of
a
Step
4.
And
I
think
we
talked
about
this
last
week.
And
I
don't
really,
I
don't
really
do
that.
What
I'm
looking
for
out
of
the
evening
review
is
corrective
measures
for
tomorrow.
There's
no
point
in
analysing
things
for
the
sake
of
analysing
it.
The
point
is
to
figure
out
what
I
need
to
believe,
think,
and
do
differently
tomorrow.
That's
what
the
key
is.
So
where
it
says
were
we
resentful,
it
doesn't
say
what
will
we
resentful
about?
But
almost
everyone
I
know
does
an
evening
review.
This
is
in
the
past,
almost,
well,
2829
years.
Almost
everyone
thinks
it's
right.
Lots
of
things
about
all
the
people
that
bother
you.
No,
no,
no,
no,
no.
Were
you
resentful?
In
other
words,
were
you
indulging
that
character
defect?
Ditto
with
fear.
Doesn't
say
What
are
you
frightened
about?
Were
you
frightened?
In
other
words,
were
you
indulging
the
fear?
And
then
you've
got
a
completely
different
question.
Because
the
real
question
then
is,
isn't
that
interesting?
You
know,
I'll
ask
myself,
isn't
that
interesting?
How
attracted
I
am
to
finding
fault
with
other
people,
things
in
the
world?
And
it's
always
because
I
feel
guilty
or
awkward
or
ashamed
or
embarrassed
or
inadequate
in
myself,
which
is
why
I'm
looking
for
someone
else
whose
fault
it
is
more
than
mine.
So
the
real
question
with
resentment
and
fear
is,
what's
my
investment
that
is
giving
rise
to?
It's
never
about
the
content.
The
so-called
content
is
the
is
the
blank
screen
onto
which
all
of
that
stuff
is
being
projected.
Now,
sometimes
you
need
to
do
a
little
bit
of,
you
know,
detailed
work
on
the
content,
but
the
the
danger
is
believing
that
if
you
get
rid
of
the
content
somehow
that
the
resentment
will
go
away.
And
it
won't
because
the
next
day
if
the
reason
why
you're
resentful,
which
is
internal,
which
has
got
to
do
with
an
internal
state
of
mind.
If
that
isn't
resolved,
you'll
simply
find
something
else
the
next
day.
And
the
two,
the
two
things
which
I
find
sort
of
persistent
when
people
do
these
reviews
is
either
the
same
thing
coming
up
day
after
day
after
day
after
day
on
the
review,
or
it
looks
like
a
different
thing,
but
it's
the
same
thing
wearing
a
different
hat,
you
know,
So
one
person,
it
will
always
be
people
in
authority
who
are
trying
to
belittle
them
or
not
giving
them
enough
credit,
for
instance.
And
every
day
it's
a
it's
a
new
example
and
it
looks
like,
and
it's
can
I
read
you
my
inventory?
And
of
course,
there's
no
new
information.
And
so
that's
why
the
I
think
the
focus
must
be
getting
the
corrected
measures
on
the
table
and
the
review
the
following
day
is
how
diligent
were
you
in
implementing
those
corrected
measures?
For
instance,
if
it's
fear,
you
know,
how
diligently
did
you
recite
memorized
prayers
about
God's
protection?
How
many
times
did
you
recite
Psalm
91
today?
Well,
I
didn't,
I
just
sat
in
fit.
Ah,
you
see,
that's
the
problem
then.
It's
not
about
the
thing
you're
frightened
of.
It's
the
indulgence
of
it.
So
that
the,
the
focus
I,
I,
I
take
with
people
on
the
review
is
very
different
to
what
most
people
do.
It's
not
that
other
people
are
doing
it
wrong.
This
is
just
what
I
do.
So,
so
it's
all
about,
it's
all
about
corrective
measures.
And
I
think
the
corrective
measures
business,
business
and
the
same
and
sound
ideal.
So
at
the
end
of
eight
and
9:00,
the
sane
and
sound
ideal
for
each
problematical
area
which
represents
the
ideals
to
which
will
towards
which
we're
willing
to
grow.
And
then
on
a
daily
basis
there
are
corrected
measures
for
the
more
minute
adjustments.
And
I
think
this
is
the
engine
of
change.
Unless
I've
got
a
vision
for
what
I
should
be,
I
can't.
I
can't
move
towards
it.
So
it
sounds
like
it's
September.
It's
not
because
it's
the
it's
the
likely.
It's
the
nightly
review.
Um,
now
then,
if
the
corrective
measures
aren't
being
implemented,
you
get
to
the
really
interesting
question,
which
is
about
willingness.
Why
isn't
the
willingness
to
do
this?
What's
going
on?
And
that's
when
you
really
get
to
the
core
getting
too
involved
in
the
so-called
content
of
the
psychological
stuff,
the
resemblance,
the
fears,
the
aversions,
the
attractions.
Getting
too
absorbed
in
the
content
of
that
you
can
end
up
never
asking
the
real
question
about
willingness
to
change
your
entire
point
of
view
about
everything.
So
that's
the
mistake
I've
made.
Getting
super
involved
in
the
detail
and
then
finding
you're
you're
just
it's
like
chasing.
It's
like
a
dog
chasing
its
tail.
And
you
and
the
Swansea
together
form
one
sort
of
unholy
dog
chasing
its
tail
or
constantly
trying
to
to
get
them
to
do
the
program.
But
their
everyday
they
come
up
with
another,
you
know,
wheelbarrow
full
of
material
and
you're
constantly
pro.
You're
you're
bailing
out
this
wheelbarrow
every
day
and
the
next
day
they
go
and
fill
it
up
again
and
bring
to
you
all
the
things
they
fill
the
wheelbarrow
with.
Now,
if
you
don't
get
past
the
content,
content
you
can
you
can
stay
stuck
in
that
for
a
long
time.
And
I
think
that's
probably
classed
as
an
Al
Anon
slip
to
do
that
to
not.
And
of
course,
when
you
try
and
go
be,
people
love
you
addressing
the
content.
People
hate
getting
behind
it
and
looking
at
questions
of
real
questions,
of
willingness
to
live
the
corrective
measures.
And
that's
how
you
know
you're
getting
close
to
the
truth
is
when
the
real
resistance
comes
up.
And
The
funny
thing
was
there
was
someone
I
was
sponsoring
a
few
years
ago,
and
this
is
actually,
this
is
one
person
that
is
like
several
people
where
they
they're
people
sober
a
long
time.
They
phoned
up
and
say,
can
I
read
my
inventory
to
you?
Can
I
read
it
to
you?
And
if
I
said
no,
they
were
so
disappointed.
I
said,
no,
let's
talk
about
something
else.
And
they
didn't
want
to
do
that.
They
wanted
to.
It
was
like
there
was
some,
it's
like
that
sort
of
in,
in
one
of
the
religions.
I'm
told
people
will
gain
absolution
and
then
see
themselves
having
license
to
sin
again
because
they've
been
they've
done
the
penance.
And
it's
like
as
a
sponsor,
you
can
become
the
person
that
they,
they
come
to
very
sort
of
guiltily
to
reveal
all
the
bad
stuff
they've
done
or
thought
in
order
to
then
clear
the
decks
to
go
and
do
it
again.
And
so
I've
got
to
be
terribly
careful
not
to
be,
not
to
be
become
part
of
that
system.
So
I've
become
part
of
the
problem.
My
sponsor
talks
about
the,
the,
the
crocodile
tears
of
sincere
sincerity,
insincere
sincerity.
And
it's
the
same
sometimes
with
slippers.
You
get
this
people
that
relapse
on
repeatedly
on
alcohol,
although
the
question
is,
are
they
relapsing
or
did
they
did
they
ever
really
stop
forever?
The
the
issue
is
this
sort
of
cycle
and
it
talks
about
the
cycle
in
the
doctor's
opinion,
emerging
remorseful
and
then
they
call
you
and
they
set
them
going
again.
And
then
over
weeks
or
months
they
drift
and
then
they
drink
again.
And
then
it's
the
world
known
stage
stages
of
the
spree
and
you're
just
it's
like
the
stations
of
the
cross.
You're
just
one
of
the
stops
on
this
endless
cycle.
So
I,
I'm
very,
very
alert
now
to
being
part
of
one
of
those
cycles
where
the
time
in
a
A
is
the
necessary
penance
to
go
back
and
slip
again.
Because
then
if
you
give
a,
and
this
is
the
thing,
if
you
give
a,
a,
a
really
good
go
and
you
slip,
it's
not
your
fault
if
you
slip.
So
you
don't
have
to
feel
guilty
about
it
as
a
A
clearly
didn't
work.
So
some
of
the
slippiest
people
are
some
of
the
best
at
doing
the
program
when
they
come
back.
And
this
dynamic
works
similarly
with
people
with
lots
of
very,
very
high
drama
that
there
are,
there's
a
well,
there's
a
cycle
of
the
drama
escalates
and
escalates
and
escalates
and
then
they
come
to
you
and
you
process
it
and
they're
clean
down
and
everything's
fine.
And
then
it
all
builds
from
scratch
again
and
again.
It's
exactly
the
same
as
with
the
people
who
are
repeatedly
drinking.
And
so
the
way
to
get
at
those
is
to
be
looking
at
the.
This
is
why
the
daily
calling
and
and
if
someone
is
presenting
with
systemic
problems.
So
the
daily
calling.
I
get
people
to
call
daily
in
their
first
few
when
doing
the
steps
for
the
first
time
when
they're
coming
back
off
a
relapse
or
if
they're
presenting
systemic
problems.
So
sort
of
generalized
depression
or
anxiety
or
something
like
that.
After
several
years
in
AA
and
they've
done
the
program,
you
know,
6
*
7
*
9
times
and
they're
in
a
bad
way.
And
what's
so
interesting
is
that
it,
that
the
sticking
point
is
always
the
implementation
of
the
corrective
measures.
It's
always
where
the
problem
lies.
I,
I
one
example
is,
and
this
is
again,
not
one
particular
person,
it's
lots
of
people
I've
seen
over
the
years
where
the,
if
the
solution
is
step
12
and
really
engaging
in
step
12.
And
the
problem
is
this
relentless
return
into
self
obsession
and
old
mental
patterns
of
victimhood
and
blame
and
self
pity
and
self
indulgence.
And
all
those,
I
speak
from
experience
in
my
first
16
years
were
not
pretty.
The
solution
is
step
12.
And
if
you
just
tell
people
and
they
totally
buy
that
you
spend
a
week,
you
know,
preparing
for
that
launch
into
step
12,
unless
it's
then
monitored
daily,
it
just
drifts
away.
And
what's
so
interesting
when
I
get
people
on
a
thing
where
they
they
call
every
day
with
what
they're
Step
12
stuff
is
you
find
out
very
quickly
that
even
a
week
later,
the
enthusiasm
has
waned
for
the
Step
12.
Southern
corners
are
being
cut
straight
away.
And
you
can
hold
people
to
what
they
agreed
they
were
doing
just
by
looking
at
it
on
a
daily
basis.
And
then
eventually
it's
like,
it's
like
holding
a
plant
in
new
soil
and
you
kind
of
have
to,
what
the
plant
wants
to
do
is
pull
up
its
roots
and
run
away.
And
it's
like
you're
holding
the
plant
there
until
the
roots
take
and
then
the
roots
five.
But
there
is
a
period
where,
and
I,
this
was
done
with
me
where,
where
you
need
to
be
held
to
it.
And
I
do
it
daily.
My
sponsor,
when
my
sponsor
was
doing,
was
doing
it
weekly
just
because
of
his
schedule.
So
I,
I
prefer
5
minutes.
I'd
rather
have
5
minutes
a
day
than
one
hour
a
week.
But
it's
this,
this
daily
cycle,
it's
being
part
of
that
daily
cycle
where
people
get
to
reveal
what's
not
working,
have
corrector
measures
and
implement
them.
I
think
that's
powerhouse
the
whole
thing
and
without
someone
else
intimately
on
the
inside
of
that
process,
it
tends
not
to
people
who
are
some
people
like
self
basing
chickens,
they're
absolutely
fine
that
that
they're
up
and
running.
Other
people
will
have
a
tendency
to
close
back
in
on
themselves
and
go
back
into
the
old
patterns.
And
it's
for
those
people
that
I
find
it
most,
most
useful
to
do
that
daily,
daily
business
with.
So
that's
all
I
got
on
step
11.
So
I'll
hand
it
back
to
you,
Alistair,
to
see
if
there
any
any
questions
from
our
dazed
onlookers.
Thank
you
very
much,
Tim.
The
meeting
is
now
open
for
questions
for
Tim,
which
can
be
done
by
the
raised
hand
function
in
Zoom,
or
you
can
message
me
through
the
chat
function
and
I
will
ask
Tim
directly.
And
if
all
else
fails,
please
wave
your
hand
at
the
camera
and
I
will
try
to
get
you.
And
we
normally
try
to
close
on
the
hour,
but
it's
very
informal,
so
we
may
run
past
with
that.
I'll
open
it
up
for
questions.
Harry.
Hey
everyone,
I'm
Mary,
an
alcoholic.
Thanks,
Tim.
This
could
be
a
bit
of
a
sprawling
1,
apologies.
So
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
so
about.
I'd
say
less
than
half
of
my
sponsees
have
even
said
they're
even
willing
to
do
it.
Just
what
it
says
in
the
book,
they'll
always
tag
things
on
and
turn
it
into
my
conspiritation,
all
sorts
of
stuff.
And
like
you
said.
So
my
approach
is,
OK,
well,
you
can
do
whatever
you
like,
how
you
know,
in
addition,
as
long
as
you're
giving
the
core
stuff
here
a
fair
go.
So
the
question
is
really
about,
but
all
of
them
say
it's
about
the
point.
What's
the
point
of
step
11?
It
says
it's
about
improving
our
conscious
contact
with
God.
So
how
do
you
know
if
what
you're
doing
is
improving
your
conscious
contact
with
God?
Because
actually
most
really,
I
don't
think
this
is
unfair.
People
will
say,
well,
it's
maybe
with
mind
transparentation,
for
example,
in
my
case,
it
gave
me
a
better
ability
to
see
my
thoughts
as
distinct
things
that
were
separate
from
me.
So
that's
one
material
benefit,
you
know,
most
of
the
time
it's,
it
makes
me
feel
better.
I
have
a
bliss
out
and
I
feel
floaty.
And
that's
how
they
evaluate
it
as
being
a
good
sort
of
step
eleven
thing.
But
none
of
them
have
been
like,
as
part
of
my
Step
11,
I
did
AIT
course,
you
know,
to
make
it
more
useful
at
work
or,
you
know,
so
how
do
you
evaluate
whether
something's
improving
your
conscious
contact
with
God?
That's
a
lot
of
questions.
I've
written
some
of
them
down.
So
now
what's
the
point
is
an
interest,
I
think
that
needs
to
be
covered
first.
You
see,
I'm,
I'm
going
to
go
against
everything
I
said
in
stock
quoting
a
Course
in
Miracles
here.
So,
you
know,
there
we
go.
But
there's
a
section
of
Course
in
Miracles,
which
is
one
of
the
more
practical
ones.
You
know
how
some
of
those
sections
about
lilies
are
not
necessarily
super
obvious
how
you
apply
them,
but
there's
a
section
called
Rules
for
Decision.
What?
The
basic
gist
is
this,
you
can't
make
any
decision
without
a
guide.
Now
the
guide
is
either
your
ego
or
it's
the
OR
it's
the
higher
power.
So
you
get
to
pick
one.
If
you
don't
actively
pick
the
higher
power
because
the
ego
is
always
there
and
the
ego
ego
always
answers
1st,
you
will
be
following
your
ego.
There
is.
You
can't
not
make
decisions
because
you
have
to
live.
You
have
to
have
a
day.
So
you're
going
to
be
making
decisions.
The
only
question
is
where
are
you
going
to
get
the
decisions
from?
So
what's
the
point
of
step
11
is
to
To
seek
direction
from
your
higher
power
rather
than
from
your
ego.
Why
would
you
want
to
do
that?
Because
the
ego
can
only
bring
fear,
frustration,
disappointment
and
despair.
That's
fear,
frustration,
disappointment
and
despair.
Because
the
purpose?
The
ego
is
to
establish
for
me
a
separate
identity
in
the
material
world
as
exhibited
by
the
material
form
that
we
appear
to
inhabit,
and
then
to
make
that
identity
and
form
special
in
some
way.
And
if
you
look
at
the
material
world,
it's
notoriously
difficult
to
make
a
name
for
yourself
on
a
planet
with
8
billion
people.
And
it's
notoriously
difficult
to
achieve
any
sort
of
permanent
for
yourself
when
you
are
made
90%
of
water
on
a
planet
where
water
evaporates
at
room
temperature.
People
are
very
squashable
and
evaporatable.
It,
it's
and
the,
so
the
egos
plans
are
all
about
trying
to
secure
some
kind
of
eternal
value
from
a
place
which
is
endlessly
dangerous
and
mutable,
whether
it's
materially
or
or
in
terms
of
reputation
and
things
like
that.
So,
so
the,
the,
it's
got
to
be
understood
in
step
three
that
the
ego
based
life.
I'm
not
making
this
up.
This
is
directly
from
a
life
run
on
self.
Will
can
hardly
be
a
success.
There
we
go.
Is
he
not
a
victim
of
the
delusion
that
he
can
rest
happiness
and
satisfaction
from
this
world
if
he
only
manages
well?
So
it's
based
on
the
idea.
Hopefully
the
idea
is
bought
that
you're
on
a
hiding
to
nothing
but
the
ego.
So
the
smart
money
is
to
go
with
the
higher
power.
And
once
that
idea
is
understood,
then
you've
got
a
basis
for
explaining
what
is
Step
11.
Step
11
is
the
process
by
by
which
you
actively,
deliberately,
consciously,
manually
override
your
ego
and
go
straight
to
the
boss.
You
want
to
you
kind
of
want
to
be
a
sorry,
I
shouldn't
say
Karen
with
Karen
W
here,
but
you
know
that
the
dreadful
meme
in
America
of
the
Karen
who
who
says
I
want
to
see
the
manager.
You
want
to
be
a
Karen
here.
You
want
to
be
like
Karen.
You
want
to
see
the
manager,
you
want
to
see
the
boss.
You
don't.
You
don't
want
to
palm
yourself,
you
want
to
fob
yourself
up
with
your
ego.
You
want
to
go
straight
to
the
boss,
get
the
good
stuff
from
behind
the
counter.
So
that's
the
point
of
step
11
is
to
insist
it
is
to
develop
is
take
your
sense
of
entitlement
and
say
I'm
entitled
to
the
best
possible
guidance
for
my
life
in
order
to
make
the
best
possible
decisions,
to
have
the
best
possible
outcome,
which
is
peace.
I'm
entitled
to
that.
Give
it
to
me.
And
that's
super
helped
because
it's
taking
what
looks
like
a
character
defect,
which
is
belligerence
and
entitlement,
and
turning
them
into
virtues.
So
you're
fighting
not
against
something,
but
for
what
is
your
inheritance,
which
is
a
much
better
life.
Bob
Olsen.
Bob
Olsen
is
an
A
a
speaker
from
Colorado
Inc.
I
want
to
say
Inglewood,
Colorado.
Is
that
a
place
in
anyway?
I
think
he's
from
there
on
those
on
the
site.
It
will
save,
you
know,
so
and
so
from
so
and
so
because
there
are
lots
of
Bob
this
is
and
Bob
that
So
Bob
Olson
from
from,
from
Colorado
or
maybe
Littleton,
I
don't
know.
Anyway,
he's
very
good
on
this.
He
says
if
you
honestly
want
to
seek
your
higher
powers
will
and
you
take
the
actions
of
asking
you
better,
but
you
better
bet
your
bottom
dollar
that
what
comes
down
the
choose
to
you
is
more
likely
to
be
God's
will
than
if
you
just
run
on
automatic.
And
any,
I
think
any
experience
of
step
11
will
prove
this,
that
even
if
you
don't
get
the
knowledge
during
the
day,
you're
more
sensitised
to
ideas
which
are
not
ordinarily
your
own
after
other
people
say
is
just
going
to
bother
you
more.
It
gets
in
like
it
it
it
wears
away
the
varnish.
How
do
you
know
it's
worked?
There
are
two
ways.
Well,
actually
there
are
three
ways.
The
first,
there
are
four
ways.
The
list
is
growing
as
we
speak.
So
the
1st
way
is
to
listen
to
the
tone
of
the
voice.
So
if
the
toe
if
if
the
action
indicated
through
the
step
11
process
is
about
fear,
resentment,
guilt,
shame,
bracket
sin
would
be
the
traditional
word
for
shame.
The
sense
of
there
being
something
wrong
with
you
in
addition
to
having
done
something
wrong.
Fear,
resentment,
guilt,
shame,
attraction
and
aversion.
Those
are
the
six
you
want
to
look
out
for.
If
it's
to
do
with
those,
then
you
might
want
to
be
suspicious.
The
I,
I
behave
very
badly
on
one
particular
protracted
occasion
about
11
years
ago
and
I
I
wasn't
rather
than
telling
my
sponsor
that
there
was
dirty
work
afoot.
And
when
I
finally
revealed
the
situation,
which
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
here,
when
I
finally
revealed
the
content
of
the
situation
to
my
sponsor,
I
said,
I'm
now
kind
of
stuffed
because
I
don't
know
whether
to,
like
you're
saying
I
should
go
to
God,
but
I've
been
going
to
God
throughout
this
whole
thing.
And
I
genuinely
thought
I
was
doing
the
right
thing.
He
said,
did
you
pray
for
the
good
of
all?
And
I
suddenly
realized,
no.
And
that's
a
really
good
test.
So
on
one
hand,
is
it
based
on
fear,
resentment,
guilt,
shame,
attraction
or
aversion,
or
is
it
is
it
based
on
acting
for
the
good
of
all,
which
is
dovetails
beautifully
with
tradition
one
and
unity
and
common
welfare.
And
when
I
think
of
all
of
my
little
sort
of
emotional
Jags
which
have
resulted
in
behaviour
which
I
thought
was
justified
often
in
the
service
structure,
I've
been
absolute
ogre
When
I
apply
that
test
retrospectively,
was
I
acting
out
of
one
of
those
six
or
was
I
acting
for
the
good
of
all?
Oh,
there
was.
I
always
had
an
angle.
I
was,
I
always
had
an
angle
when
I
was
behaving
badly.
So
I
think
it's
a
terribly
good
test.
It
is
looking
at
what
the
tone
of
it
is.
Is
it,
is
it,
is
it,
Does
it
come
from
a
place
of
goodness
or
does
it
come
from
a
place,
from
one
of
the
other
ones?
You
can
always
compare
it
to
the
principles
of
the
program
that
says
the
second
thing.
Does
it
occur?
You
know,
does
it
accord
with
the
principle
in
the
big
Book?
If
so,
which
page
is
it
on
which
principle?
Which
line?
Give
us
the
quotation?
Very
helpful,
particularly
if
you
take
chapters
8:00
and
9:00
as
guides
to
interaction
with
other
people
and
you
extract
the
principles
from
there
and
test
your
proposed
course
of
action
against
those
7-8
and
nine.
Actually
chapter
7-8
and
nine,
that's
really
helpful.
You
run
it
past
a
grown
up.
Now
don't
run
it
past
seven
grown-ups
because
you
won't
get
a
quorum
probably.
And
then
it
then
you
just
end
up
picking
the
one
that
you
are
going
to
do
anyway.
So
have
a
couple
of
super
trusted
grown-ups
to
push
these
things
past.
That's
three
things.
How
do
you
tell
if
it's
God's
will?
Fourth
thing
is,
is
you
have
to
try
it
out
and
see
if
it
works
or
not.
And
if
it's
not,
if
it
doesn't
work,
you
admit
it
promptly
and
you
find
out
pretty
quickly
usually.
So
I
think
that
combination
of
looking
at
the
tone
of
the
voice
behind
it
that
like
the
intent
behind
it,
comparing
its
principle,
running
it
past
a
grown
up
and
you
know,
try
it
out,
see
what
happens
and
you
get
a
pretty
good
view
there.
Emotional
state.
So
transcendental
states
are
not
necessarily
a
good
sign
that
you've
actually
contacted,
that
you're
in
contact
with
God's
will.
Very
often
God's
will
comes
in
the
form
of
a
very
uncomfortable
awareness
of
where
one
is
going
wrong.
I'm
super
uncomfortable.
It
is
not.
It's
different
than
guilt
and
shame,
which
are
kind
of
self
indulgent
morasses
that
one
can
swim
around
in,
and
a
kind
of
attractive
in
some
way
that
it's
just
this
gnawing
awareness
that
one's
got
it
wrong
and
one
needs
to
do
it
differently.
That's
the
best
test
is,
Oh
my
God,
I've
got
this
wrong
for
seven
years.
What
I
really
ought
to
be
doing
is
speaking
in
single
sentences
as
opposed
to,
you
know,
James
Joyce
novels,
for
instance.
So
anyway,
I
think
that's,
I
hope
that's
covered
your
questions.
Harry,
can
I,
can
I
just
respond
by
quickly
because
I,
I
find
it
quite
interesting
that
so
in
the
in
the
step,
sorry,
in
the
big
book,
step
11,
in
the
12
and
12,
step
11,
even
in
the
appendix
2
spiritual,
not
once
does
it
say
this
is
going
to
feel
good.
It
says
we,
you
know,
we
asked,
you
know,
save
us
from
self
pity,
but
it
doesn't
ever.
Now
I
feel
pretty
good
a
lot
of
the
time,
but
it
doesn't
say,
you
know,
you
are
really
going
to
be
floating
here.
It
it
never
really
seems
to
give
me
that
sense
at
all.
So
absolutely,
yeah,
Seamus,
hello,
everyone.
Thank
you,
Tim.
Lots
of
food
for
thought
there.
I
want
to
go
back
to
ground
that
you
covered
in
the
first
5-10
minutes
about
alternative
belief
systems.
Can
you
work
with
the
grain
of
ice
or
or
not?
I'm
not
too
much
trouble
with
people
having
religious
beliefs.
I
can
think
of
one
guy
who
thought
he
was
born
again
and
that
kind
of
gave
him
a
free
pass
on
most
of
what
you
might,
what
you
might
have
called
the
spiritual
side
of
the
program.
And
it
was
the
kind
of
born
again
church
where
God
wants
his
people
to
be
prosperous.
So
it
comes
with,
comes
with
goodies.
So
you
could
sort
of
go
to
church
and,
and
pray
for
goodies.
And
that
maybe
brings
me
to
the,
the
bigger
points,
the
nub
of
the
question,
which
is
the
kind
of
new
age
belief
that
you
can
manifest
things
and
attract
things
through
the
power
of
positive
thinking.
I
find
this
is
very
widespread
in
a
A1
has
a
sort
of
alluded
to
in
meetings
and
it's
not
just
a
new
age
thing.
It
has
its
roots
in
in
the
power
of
positive
thinking,
which
appears
to
have
deep
roots
in
American
culture.
You
know,
the
idea
that
if
you
want
to
achieve
something,
you
have
to
vision
it
positively,
and
then
you
will
kind
of
like,
get
it.
Now
I
can
see
how
negative
thinking
will
attract
negative
things,
and
I
think
the
spirit
of
that
is
in
is
in
step
11.
You
know
what
you
said
about
resentment,
dishonesty,
fear
and
and
and
selfishness,
But
it's
never
been
clear
to
me
that
the
converse
is
true,
that
that
one
can
somehow
conjure
into
existence
positive
goodies
by
thinking
more
positively
about
them.
How
does
one
deal
with
that?
Enough
of
question.
I
once
went
to
a
sponsor.
I
said
to
him,
a
friend
of
mine
was
going
through
some
sort
of
difficult
time
and
I
said
to
my
sponsor,
what
should
I
do?
And
my
sponsor
said
hide,
just
hide.
And
that
was
very
good
advice.
In
fact,
the
individual
in
question
is
now
sort
of
a
famous
editor
and
journalist
and
columnist.
So.
So
everything
turned
out
well
in
the
end.
But
anyway,
yes,
I
I
find
all
that
stuff
a
bit
disagreeable
really,
to
put
it
mildly.
However,
however,
there's
a
little
bit
of
Emmet
Fox
which
touches
on
things
like
that
much,
certainly
what's
his
name,
Norman
Vincent
Peale.
And
I
think
there's
more.
My
experience,
I've
used
both
extensively
and
I
think
there
is
more
good
than
ill
in
both,
but
it's,
I
think
it's
a
very
banal
and
ridiculous
application
of
that
principle
to
turn
it
into,
you
know,
sort
of
Ferraris
and
swimming
pools
and
promotions.
I'm
absolutely
convinced
that
my
life
is
chiefly
limited
by
my
limited
perception
of
it,
and
to
have
those
limitations
lifted
by
envisioning
a
much
more
expansive
interest
in
life.
I
think
it's
absolutely
the
solution,
but
I
think
it
must
be
applied
to
more
abstract
commodities
like
kindness
and
diligence
and
interest
and
curiosity
and
all
those
sort
of
virtues
that,
you
know,
I,
I
find
it
very
easy
to
write
myself
off
as
a
sort
of
bag
of
character
defects
bumbling
through
the
world
like
the,
the
castle
and
howls
moving
castle.
You
know,
it
works,
but
it's
not
elegant.
But
actually
that
the
I
think
the
only
I've
held
myself
back
by
not
by
not
visualizing
that
I
could
be
different,
that
I
could
be
a
more
expansive,
a
kinder
and
a
more
useful
person.
That
it
what
Your
question
reminds
me
of
a
lot
of
what
Anthony
Demello
writes
about
taking
perfectly
sound
spiritual
principles
and
making
a
complete
mockery
of
them
by
running
them
through
the
materialistic
framework.
So
there's
there's
a
wonderful
Anthony
Demello
story
about
ants
and
their
conception
of
God
and
how
some
very
learned
ants
argue
about
they
all
agree
that
when
we
go
to
the
other,
when
the
ants
go
to
the
higher
realm
that
they're
going
to,
they're
going
to
have,
if
they've
lost
their
sting
during
their
life,
the
sting
will
be
restored.
But
the
question
is
whether
they
have
two
stings
or
three
or
something
like
that.
So
that
the
that
that
theological
framework
is
limited
by
the
fact
that
they're
ants
and
their
conception
of
God
is
limited
by
so
they
can
only
imagine
God
as
an
Ant,
but
bigger
than
that.
And
I
think
it's
the
same
if
you,
so
if
you've
got
a
materialistic
framework
and
you
grab
hold
of
spiritual
principles
without
sufficient
training
and,
and,
and
dismantling
of
the
materialistic
structure,
you'll
simply
redeploy.
You'll,
you'll
simply
recreate
yourself
using
it.
You'll,
you'll
assimilate
like
the
Borg,
you'll
assimilate
the
so-called
spirituality
into
your
existing
framework.
Whereas
of
course,
if
you
get
rid
of
that
framework
and
then
you
adopt
the
spirituality,
you're
getting
a
clean,
a
clean
version
of
it.
I
had
a
sponsee.
I
don't
think
he'll
mind
me
saying
this,
but
he's,
he's
rather
sort
of
amusing
about
the
whole
thing.
And
he
did
the
whole
manifesting
thing
for
a
couple
of
years
and
I
sort
of
left
him
alone
with
it.
He
didn't
really
ask
me
anything
about
it,
just
did
it.
And
he
came
to
me
after
a
couple
of
years.
He
said
it
was
a
whole
load
of
bullshit,
isn't
it?
I
said
yes,
he's,
but
he
had
to
go
through
it
and
try
it
and
realize
that
it's
all
sort
of
The
thing
is
trying
to
manifest
a
career
and
it
just
didn't
happen.
Umm,
so
I
don't
get,
I
don't
get
too
involved
in
it
because
if
people
are
very
bought
into
it,
there's
nothing
you
can,
nothing
you
can
say
or
do.
But
I
just
gently
point
them
towards
pages
6060
and
61
and
that
seems
to
send
them
running
for
the
hills.
Or
they
just
never
talk
about
it
to
me
again.
So
I
don't
know
if
that
answers
your
question
at
all.
And
anyone
else
have
a
question
for
Tim?
Have
also
dropped
in
the
link
to
the
Google
Drive
where
you
can
find
the
recordings
from
these
previous
meetings.
I
just
say
one
more
thing
about
that.
It's
true
the
manifesting
thing.
It's
true
with
other
things
is
people
at
liberty
to
do
whatever
they
want,
but
one's
got
to
recognize
what
the
program
says
and
it
and
on
87
it
talks
very
clearly
about
not
praying
for
selfish
ends.
And
you
can
only
pray
if
other
people
will
be
helped.
So
you
can
point
out,
you
said,
or
you
do
what
you
want,
but
you
be
be
aware
that
it
is
the
opposite
of
what
the,
a,
a
program
is
suggesting.
And
you
get
to
pick,
but
don't
think
that
just
because
what
you're
doing
comes
under
a
spiritual,
religious
heading,
it's
necessarily
compatible
with
the,
with
the
program.
And
that's
a
point
that
I
think
is
worth
making
to
people.
Can
I
just
ask
one
more
quick
one?
So
you
just
you
just
find
something
else
for
me.
So
I
think
a
lot
of
the
confusion
or
or
the
difference
in
approach
to
step
11,
whether
you
stick
very
close
to
the
big
book
or
you
go
totally
off
piece
and
stuff
is
down
to
a
sort
of
idea
that
well,
the
program
is
what
you
choose
it
to
be.
So
where
are
you
at
with
that?
So
you're
quite
big
bookie,
but
it's
not
our
job
to
convince
anyone
that's
the
case,
right?
You
can,
you
can
take
it
or
you
can
do
something
else.
Is
that
where
you're
at?
Well,
I'm
going
to
say
something
so
awful
no
one
will
talk
to
me
again
after
this,
unfortunately.
Unfortunately,
the
program
was
devised
by
specific
people
at
a
specific
time,
in
a
specific
context
with
a
specific
purpose.
Unfortunately,
they
established
that
as
being
the
AA
program.
Uh,
they
wrote
it
and
they
were
pretty
clear.
They
were
unclear
about
certain
things.
It's
as
Alan
G
says
that
it's
clear
up
to
a
point.
It's
clear
what
it,
it's
clear
about,
but
it's
silent
on
many
things
and
leaves
a
lot
of
things
to
people's
own
discretion.
Like
the
exact
form
of
Step
5
does
not
tell
you
how
to
do
it
gives
you
general
principles,
other
things.
It's
super,
super,
super
specific,
but
in
as
far
as
they've
written
it
down,
that
is
what
they
agreed
one
way
or
another.
I
was
a
bit.
It
was
a
messy
process,
but
essentially.
It
reflects
what
they
believe
the
program
was
and
the
program
came
before
the
fellowship
and
came
before
the
book.
Now,
if
someone
does
something
else
that
may
work
better,
but
it's
not
the
a
a
program.
It's
a
kind
of
version.
It's
their
own
version
of
it.
And
that's
just
not
a
bad
thing.
But
it
is.
I
don't
think
you
can
you
can
say
this
is
the
a
a
program
when
it's
when
it's
radically.
Now
people
have
their
own
takes
on
things,
their
own
versions
of
things.
Everyone
does
the
big
books
slightly
differently.
So
there
there,
there's
obviously
huge
amounts
of
variation
within
that,
but
things
which
are
radically
different.
I've
given
one,
if
I
may,
there
was
a
woman
in
in
in
Oh,
why
it's
a
woman.
It's
irrelevant.
It
could
have
been
a
man
in
Al
Anon
many
years
ago
who
said
who
read
off
the
the
wall,
the
steps
on
the
wall
Step
5
exact
nature
are
wrong
as
well.
Those
are
the
wrongs
that
were
done
to
me.
So
in
my
step
five,
I
told
someone
else
all
the
terrible
things
that
have
ever
been
done
to
me
and
that
was
Step
5.
Now
that's
she's
done
a
step,
but
it's
not
it's
not
Alan
Norton
step
five.
It's
five.
It
may
be
better
than
Allen
on
Step
5,
but
it's
not
Alan
on
Step
5.
So
I'm
skeptical
about
relabeling
things
the
a
a
steps
when
when
they're
when
they're
not.
And
that's
why
I'm
kind
of
big
bookie,
really.
And
the
reason
why
I'm
big
bookie
is
because
it
actually
is
not
doctrinal.
It's
just
because
it's
what
I
found
to
work
better
than
anything
else.
And
if
I
if
something
else
worked
better,
I
would
be
doing
it
and
you'd
have
a
different
speaker
this
evening.
So
that's
what
I've
got
on
that.
Thanks,
Tim.
Claire,
hi
there.
I'm
sorry,
I
think
I
guess
we're
running
out
of
time.
So
a
question
would
be,
is
there
any,
would
you
see
there
being
any
risk
of
the
Course
in
Miracles
sort
of
unravelling
the
12
step
program
in
a
way
when
a
person
can
go
very
far
into
the
course?
And
at
what
point
must
you
put
down
the
course?
Good
question.
Listen
to
Ken
Wapnick
about
this.
He's
absolutely
brilliant
and
completely
scathing
actually.
And
if
you
think
I'm
skating,
listen
to
Ken
Wapnick
talk
about
the
Course
in
Miracles
students
about
how
disconcerting
it
is
when
you're
out
for
dinner
with
Course
and
Miracle
students
and
they
try
and
pray
to
the
Holy
Spirit
or
to
Jesus
as
to
whether
to
have
the
chicken
entree
or
the
beef.
And
of
course,
from
the
from
the
Course
of
Miracles
perspective,
you
know
God
is
unaware
of
the
existence
of
the
material
world.
So
to
ask
God
whether
you
should
have
chicken
or
beef
is
neither
here
nor
there.
And
what
he's
very
clear
about
this
is
brilliant.
This
is
just
brilliant
because
it
applies
to
all
spiritual
paths,
is
make
a
distinction
between
the
metaphysical
and
the
physical.
These
are
different
realms.
So
whatever
metaphysical
understanding
you
have,
don't
they
inform
each
other?
The
two
realms
inform
each
other
but
do
not
get
them
confused.
So
when
you
say,
well
nothing
is
real,
it's
all
an
illusion.
Everything
is
a
projection
of
the
ego
mind.
Yes,
it
is,
but
you
still
but
still
brush
your
teeth,
have
a
dental
hygienist,
get
a
pension,
be
nice
to
other
people
even
though
it's
only
their
ego
that's
affected,
you
still
get
to
try
and
be
nice
to
them.
You
know,
six
days
out
of
seven
so
not
to
mix
the
two
levels.
So
if
you
don't
mix
the
two
levels,
you
keep
the
a
A
program
1st
and
you
go
to
a
shed
load
of
meetings
and
look
out
for
new
people
and
ask
them
if
they've
stopped
shaking
yet,
then
I
think
you're
minimizing
the
risk
that
you'll
disappear
so
far
up
yourself
that
no
one
ever
sees
you
again.
Thanks,
Tim.
With
that,
I
think
I'll
hand
the
meeting
back
to
you
and
ask
you
to
close
with
the
Serenity
player
as
opposed
to
a
prayer
from
A
Course
in
Miracles.
Absolutely.
So
let
me
close
with
the
Serenity
prayer.
God
drop
me
the
Serenity
I
cannot
change,
the
courage
changes
and
the
wisdom
to
know
the
difference.
Thank
you,
Tim.
Thank
you.
Next
week.
Bye.
Bye.
It's
CEO.
Yeah,
good
to
see
you.
The
meeting
starting
now?
It's
what
do
you
have
a
meeting
starting
now?
It's
not
a
meeting,
it's
a
kind
of
gathering.
But
yeah,
we
sort
of
start
about
50
quarter
past
20
past.
I
was
wondering
every
week
there
is
something
afterwards.
I
know
I
didn't
know
if
it
was
a
meeting
or
but
it's
an
illegal
gathering
you
say?
Yeah,
yeah,
I
saw
an
illegal
rave
we
have.
OK.
I'll
let
you
get
on
with
this.
And
then
we
asked
for
corrective
measures.
Yeah.
All
right.
Got
this.
I
see
AC,
Shakers
and
Daniel.
I
see
Shakers.
Bye,
bye.
20
past
Alistair.
Yeah,
yeah.
Is
that
all
right?
All
right,
See
you
in
a
bit.
Oh,
I've
got
to
stop
recording.