The topic of step 4 at a Sponsorship through the 12 steps workshop in London, UK
Thank
you
to
set
the
tone
for
this
meeting.
I
actually
haven't
picked
a
reading
for
today,
but
I'd
like
to
suggest
we
open
with
the
Serenity
Prayer
in
the
WE
form
if
you
would
like
to
join
me.
God
to
accept
the
things
we
can't
change,
encourage,
change
the
things
we
can,
and
the
wisdom,
wisdom
to
know
the
difference.
Thank
you.
The
topic
of
tonight's
meeting
is
working
step
four
with
the
Sponsee
Part
2
and
we're
on
to
fear
and
text
part
inventory.
And
Tim
will
share
anything
between
30
and
45
minutes
on
the
topic,
after
which
the
floor
will
be
open
for
questions
rather
than
the
typical
sharing.
And
with
that,
I
will
now
hand
over
to
Tim.
Thank
you.
Right.
So
I'm
just
going
to
share
the
screen
or
a
screen.
There
we
go.
Hopefully
the
big
book
has
appeared
in
front
of
you
and
we're
on
page
67.
So
I
think
we've
we've
finished
the
resentment
inventory,
haven't
we,
Alistair?
Yeah.
OK,
so
the
fear
inventory,
I'm
not
going
to
read
out
all
of
this,
but
look
at
the
practical
side
of
things.
So
we
review
our
fears
thoroughly.
So
what
we
do
here?
We've
already
listed
a
whole
bunch
of
fears
in
one
of
the
answers
in
the
answers
to
one
of
the
page
67
questions.
So
you
can
take
the
fears
from
there
and
just
transfer
them
onto
a
new
sheet
of
paper
and
then
brainstorm.
In
other
words,
So
what
am
I
frightened
of?
And
I,
I
find
when
I
do
this,
I
suggest
this
to
other
people,
in
half
an
hour
you
can
really
come
up
with
everything.
If
you
really
scour
your
mind
and
something
doesn't
come
up
on
the
first
half
hour,
it's
not
important.
One
of
the
important
things,
and
this
is
a
good
point
with
Step
4,
generally,
I
think
a
lot
of
people
in
AAI
think
have
got
obsessive
compulsive
disorder
and
express
that
and
how
they
work
the
program.
And
so
there's
this
this
notion
that
it
has
to
be
sort
of
thoroughly
exhausted.
The
point
here,
we're
going
to
be
getting
rid
of
fear
completely
or
or
at
least
starting
to
grow
out
of
it.
And
so
all
of
the
tiny
minutiae
are
not
are
neither
here
nor
there.
What
we
all
we
want
to
get
a
sense
of
here
is
the
fact
there
is
a
whole
load
of
fears
and
people
normally
don't
have
much
trouble
getting
a
handle
on
the
fact
there
is
a
whole
load
of
fears
that
so
you've
you've
got
a
list
from
your
page
67
questions
you
brainstormed
complete
it.
Then
there's
a
simple
question
we
asked
ourselves
why
we
had
them.
Now
the
great
thing
about
this
instruction
is
that
we
don't
need
to
that
really
come
up
with
an
answer
ourselves
because
it
gives
us
the
answer
and
the
next
time
wasn't
it
because
self-reliance
failed
us?
Now
you
could
just
let
it
go
at
that
and
and
start
to
examine,
as
I
will
do
in
a
moment,
what
it
means
to
say
that
self-reliance
failed
us.
But
what
I've
found
useful
in
unpacking
my
own
fears,
so
I
help
sponsees
do
this,
is
to
to
When
you're
frightened
of
something,
it's
very
rarely
the
thing
itself
you're
actually
frightened
of.
It
is
what
lies
behind
it,
in
other
words,
that
if
you
tip,
if
you
flick
a
domino
over
in
a
line
of
dominoes,
one
by
one
or
the
other,
dominoes
topple
until
the
last
domino
falls,
and
then
the
domino
toppling
ceases.
And
we're
after
what
the
final
domino
is.
And
I
sort
of
hate
to
give
you
a
spoiler
here,
but
I
think
the
spoiler
it
it
it
almost
always
boils
down
to
feeling
bad.
Basically,
feeling
bad
because
you're
lonely,
feeling
bad
because
you're
worthless,
feeling
bad
because
you've
wasted
your
life.
The
fact
of
emotional
pain
itself,
The
fact
of
physical
pain,
the
fact
of
death
is
not
really
a
great
number
of
these.
And
everything
boils
down
to
one
of
those.
So
if
you're
frightened
of
being
criticized
at
work,
why?
Because
I
might
lose
my
job
while
So
what?
While
I
wouldn't
have
any
money,
So
what?
Well,
I'd,
I
wouldn't
have
enough
to
live.
So
what?
I'd
be.
I'd
have
physical
pain,
I'd
have
inconvenience.
What
else?
I
would
be
thought
of
as
a
failure
by
others.
Therefore
I
think
of
myself
as
a
failure
and
as
soon
as
you
get
to
the
thing
which
is
bad
in
itself,
you
found
the
last
one.
And
people
normally
come
up
with
a
list
of
somewhere
between
4:00
and
10:00
of
these.
The
point
of
that
exercise
I
explained
to
people
is
that
you
want
to
see
that
although
it
looks
as
though
you're
scared
of
47,000
things,
if
you
can,
if
you
can
capture
the
idea,
capture
lots
and
lots
of
different
fears
and
single
ideas.
Like
I'm
frightened
of
being
a
failure,
I'm
frightened
of
physical
pain,
I'm
frightened
of
emotional
pain.
You
discover
you
don't
have
47,000
fears,
you've
got
7
or
4.
And
that
suddenly
immediately
easier
to
deal
with
because,
well,
first
of
all,
you
know
the
nature
of
the
beast.
When
you're
frightened
of
47,000
different
things
in
your
life,
it
feels
like
you're,
you're
it,
it.
It's
like
Helms
deep
being
overrun
in
the
two
towers.
It's
it's
you
know,
the
orcs
are
everywhere
and
there
are
more
coming.
Whereas
if
you've
got,
if
you
if
you
manage
to
corner
the
four,
you
know,
the
the
four
main
culprits
or
the
five
main
culprits,
you've
got
a
chance
of
doing
something
about
it.
And
I
mentioned
this
wasn't
it
because
self-reliance
failed
us.
Now
this
is
a
terribly
important
line.
Bill
doesn't
put
this
line
up
for
discussion
or
debate.
He
states
it
as
a
fact
in
the
form
of
a
rhetorical
question
to
which
the
only
acceptable
answer
is
yes,
Of
course
it
is,
Bill.
That's
the
only
possible
reason.
And
so
I
think
one
has
to
proceed
as
one
does
in
contract
law
on
the
basis
of
good
faith.
You
you,
you
proceed
assuming
that
Bill
is
writing
in
good
faith
and
the
what
he
says
is
true.
So
we've
got
to
find
an
understanding
of
wasn't
it
because
self-reliance
failed
this,
which
is
true
for
all
fears
and
not
just
some
of
them.
Otherwise
it's
no
good.
It's
no
good
having
an
explanation
for
some
of
them
Now,
um,
very
clearly,
if
you've
got
a
person
that
refused,
as
I
did
when
I
was
younger,
I
refused
to
accept
help,
as
if
you
helped
me
do
something,
the
resultant
achievement
was
not
attributable
to
me.
It
was
attributable
in
part
to
your
help,
and
the
only
reason
for
doing
anything
was
to
be
impressive.
So
I
mustn't
be
helped
by
anyone
or
I'm
defeating
the
purpose,
which
is
to
be
impressive
through
my
own
efforts.
And
of
course,
if
you
refuse
to
be
helped,
your
results
will
be
terrible
because
you're
having
to
reinvent
things
which
other
people
are
succeeding
at
because
they're
willing
to
be
helped
and
guided.
And
it's
pretty
clear
if
you,
if
you
try
and
make
all
of
your
decisions
in
your
life
without
any
guidance,
you're
going
to
make
some
pretty
crappy
decisions.
Terrible
things
will
happen
and
you're
going
to
be
frightened
because
you're
not
so
stupid
as
to
believe
that
the
same
things
are
not
going
to
continue
happening.
If
you
if
you
keep
having
catastrophe
after
catastrophe,
it
makes
sense
you're
going
to
continue
having
catastrophes.
So
fear
is
an
obvious
consequence
of
relying
on
yourself
in
the
sense
of
not,
not
accepting
helper
guidance
from
others.
But,
but
there
are
all
sorts
of
situations
where
you,
you're
a
good
boy
or
a
good
girl
and
you
keep
your
nose
clean
and
you
do
everything
right
and
you
manage
your
affairs
in
an
accomplished,
effective,
efficient,
harmonious
way.
And
yet
still
the
world
can
get
you.
Disease
can
strike,
tragedy
can
strike.
All
sorts
of
things
can
happen.
One,
I
certainly
most
of
my
fears
are
around
security.
They're
not
around
ambition.
They
used
to
be
around
ambition
and
pride.
Now
that
if
I
have
them,
they're
about
security.
There
is
no
way
you
can
be
effective
enough
to
secure
yourself
against
any
possible
event
in
the
world.
As
my
as
my
best
friend
reminds
me
on
a
regular
basis,
if
the
son
decides
to
emit
a
major
gamma
ray
burst
then
we're
all
toast
anyway
in
a
matter
of
seconds.
You
you
can't
stop
the
fact
that
universe
is
expanding
and
is
at
some
point
going
to
reach
absolutely.
There's
something
near
to
absolute
zero
spread
with
everything
spread
out
at
infinite
distances
from
everything
else
for
the
whole
thing
collapses.
There's
Woody
Allen
film
where
a
kid,
7
year
old
kid
refuses
to
do
his
homework
because
he
discovers
that
the
universe
is
endlessly
expanding
and
he
finds
it
such
a
depressing
notion
that
he
his
whole
life
is,
is
rendered
impossible.
So
being
a,
and
this
is,
I
think,
the
big
mistake
that
people
make.
I
certainly
made
it
and
most
people,
I
think
make
it
in
the
first
few
years
in
a,
a
of
using
the
program
to
become
competent
and
effective
and
accomplished
in
order
to
keep
the
wolves
at
Bay.
Like
if,
if
I
handle
life
successfully
enough,
I
will
get
rid
of
fear.
Of
course
it
it
doesn't
work.
I
mean,
I've
been
and
I've
met
people
who
are,
you
know,
married
and
comfortable
and
have
a
good
income
and
you
know,
you
make
a
whole
list
and
still
you
wake
up
in
the
morning
frightened.
So
it's
very
clear
that
sorting
your
life
out
doesn't
get
rid
of
fear,
however
well
you'll
rely,
even
if
you're
relying
on
God
and
other
people.
There
is
something
else
going
on
here
and
I
alluded
I
may
have
covered
it
briefly
last
week,
but
I'll
reiterate,
reiterate
it.
So
I
think
it's
important.
What
is
self?
Well
this
my
sponsor
talks
about
self
with
a
capital
S
which
is
who
we
are,
which
is
extensions
of
spirit.
So
if
God
is
the
source,
we
are
the
extensions
of
that,
and
being
spirit,
we
are
non
corporeal,
we
are
consciousness,
we
are
love.
We
cannot
be
hurt
in
the
material
realm,
but
we
happen
to
be
inhabiting
physical
bodies
for
the
time
being,
with
a
role
to
perform
which
is
given
to
us
by
the
higher
power,
not
which
we
have
derived
ourselves.
What
is
self?
The
book
on
page
61
equates
the
word
self
with
ego.
Now,
I'm
not
going
to
I
don't
think
we
want
to
talk
about
ego
in
the
Freudian
sense,
because
that's
different.
But
ego
in
the
spiritual
sense
are
either
Eckhart
Tolle,
Eckart
Tolle,
right?
I
think
it's
he
who
describes
it.
Thus,
ego
is
false
mind
made
images
of
self,
false
mind
made
images
of
self.
There's
any
concept
of
me
which
is
something
other
than
spirit.
Now
what
could
that
be?
It
could
be
identification
with.
So
it
is
basically
self
which
is
The
problem
is
when
I
identify
myself
with
my
physical
form,
the
circumstances
of
my
life,
my
virtues
or
defects,
my
accomplishments
and
failures,
my
popularity
or
lack
thereof,
who
I
construe
myself
to
be
as
I
discern
it
in
other
people's
reaction
to
me.
I'm
in
100
things
outside
of
myself.
A
friend
of
mine
made
amends
to
a
girl
for
pouring
vinegar
on
her
sofa
and
then
drinking
her
champagne,
which
she
kept
for
a
special
occasion.
And
the
girl
said
with
regard
to
the
vinegar
on
the
sofa
and
with
regard
to
the
champagne.
I
can't
believe
you
did
that
to
me.
And
what
really
struck
me,
it's
a
perfectly
ordinary
turn
of
phrase.
I
can't
believe
you
did
that
to
me.
Whereas
what's
very
illustrative
is
those
actions
were
not
done
to
her,
they
were
done
to
her
sofa
and
to
her
bottle
of
champagne.
So
in
order
to
say
you
did
that
to
me,
you've
got
to
have
confused
yourself.
You've
literally
confused
yourself
with
a
sofa.
You
see
the
sofa,
you
think
it's
you.
So
if
someone
comes
along
and
does
something
for
the
sofa,
they've
done
something
to
you.
This
is
a
state
of
profound
confusion.
Yet
which
of
us,
when
we
get
some
sort
of
splash
of
spaghetti
sauce
on
our
white
shirt,
doesn't
feel
embarrassed?
What
a
fool
that
we
look.
People
are
looking
at
us
and
they're
looking
at
you.
They're
looking
at
the
splatter
on
your
shirt
and
you
think
it's
you.
Or
if
the
splatter
is
further
down,
it's
even
more
embarrassing.
So
the
the
the
problem
if
I
rely
for
my
identity,
my
value
and
my
purpose
on
anything
outside
myself.
In
other
words,
anything
in
the
world,
I'm
going
to
be
frightened
because
the
world
is
volatile
and
unpredictable
and
mercurial
and
dangerous.
So
the
only
way
to
be
rid
of
fear
is
to
be
rid
of
self.
In
other
words,
to
be
rid
of
this
false
mind
made
image
of
self.
Which
means
I
still
get
to
have
all
of
those
things.
I
still
get
to
have
a
job
and
a
inverter
comms
career
and
a
house
and
family
and
people
and
so
on.
But
I
cease
to
identified
with
those.
So
although
I
would
prefer
not
to
lose
them,
if
anything
is
lost,
so
be
it.
I'm
fine.
Like
if
you
lose
your
mobile
phone,
your
ability
to
communicate
is
not
diminished
by
that.
It's
just
inconvenienced.
And
there's
a
big
difference
between
the
two.
So
that
that's
how
I
take
people
through
the
the
fear
inventory.
It
that
the
about
5%
of
the
benefit
comes
from
writing
it
and
about
95%
comes
from
trying
to
understand
that
line.
Wasn't
it
because
self-reliance
failed
us?
Now
to
the
fierce
solution.
And
just
with
the
as
with
resentment,
when
we
looked
at
resentment,
we
use
that
as
a
springboard
for
the
solution.
So
it's
terribly
important.
A
lot
of
people
in
a
a
write
about
resentment
So
often
you,
you,
you
know,
someone
will
phone
you
at
Clive,
will
phone
you
up.
And,
and
so
I've
got
a
terrible
resentment
and
you
say,
well,
what
are
you
doing
about
it?
Well,
I've
written
about
it
as
though
the
mere
fact
of
writing
about
it
is
supposed
to
eliminate
it.
And
of
course
it
doesn't.
It
may
go
some
way,
but
it's
the
spiritual
actions
on
the
top
of
page
67
which
eliminate
the
resentment.
And
it's
the
same
with
fear.
And
it's
got
some
ideas
here
which
pretty
much
speak
for
themselves.
But
we've
got
an
instruction
here.
They
trust
their
God.
That's
an
instruction.
What
does
that
mean?
That
means
I
trust
in
the
the
notions
that
I
spoke
about
before,
which
is
that
if
I'm
an
extension
of
spirit,
I'm
perfectly
safe.
I'm
I'm
kept
safe
by
God.
We
asked
him
to
remove
our
fear
and
direct
our
attention
to
what
he
would
have
us
be
And
what
I
get
people
to
do,
well,
it's
just
what
I
do
myself
is
simply
to
take
the
thing
that
I'm
frightened
of
in
the
world
or
the
situation,
usually
a
situation,
it's
best
to
do
it
on
situations
and
say,
right,
God,
what
would
you
have
me
do
in
this
situation?
What
would
you
have?
What
would
you
have
my
attitude
be?
What
would
you
have
my
actions
be?
And
as
soon
as
I
flip
to
consciously,
deliberately
adopting
and
reinforcing
the
corrective
attitude
and
I
throw
myself
wholeheartedly
into
the
corrective
behaviour,
my
experience
is
the
fear
starts
to
go.
I'm
sure
you've
had
sponsees
who
are,
oh,
I
don't
know,
one
to
five
10/15/20
or
30
years
sober
who
phoned
you
up
very
plaintively,
say
one
full
of
resentment
and
I'm
full
of
fear.
As
though,
as
though
the
individual
is
a
sort
of
great
big
vase
or,
or,
or
a,
or
a,
a
punch
bowl
into
which
some
unkind
soul
has
has
poured
this
sort
of
viscous
liquid
of
resentment
and
fear
such
that
one
is
now
full
of
it.
I'm
now
full
of
it.
The
truth
is,
I'm
the
one
that's
doing
it.
The
the
actual
A,
a
program
we
get
to
practice
in
terms
of
solution
starts
on
page
63.
By
page
68,
middle
of
page
68,
which
is
what,
4
1/2
pages
in?
It
has
given
us
a
total
and
adequate
and
sufficient
solution
both
to
resentment
and
to
fear.
So
from
this
point
onwards,
I'm
now
given
back
a
choice
as
to
whether
I
let
resentment
and
fear
into
my
life.
The
temptation
to
think
resentful
thoughts,
to
think
fearful
thoughts,
to
engage
in
either
the
temptation
will
keep
coming
because
the
ego
is
pre-installed.
It's
factory
installed
software.
You
can't
get
rid
of
it
off
the
hard
drive.
It's
going
to.
It's
like
McAfee,
it
throws
up.
You
know
those.
Have
you
done
this?
Have
you
done
that?
What
about
doing
it?
You
know,
it's
going
to
send
you
suggestions
the
whole
time,
but
it
the
one
that's
responsible
for
whether
or
not
I
pick
up
on
that.
So
it's,
it's
very
important
not
to,
I
think
not
to
view
oneself
as
a
victim
of,
of
resentment
and
fear
not
letting
them
in
and
then
expelling
them
if
one
accidentally
lets
them
in.
Of
course
that
happens
like
vampires,
you
know,
we,
we,
you
vampire
knocks
on
the
door.
They
seem
so
charming
and
within
a
few
minutes,
you
know
they've
been
let
in.
They're
biting
your
neck.
Someone
went
to
a
therapist
and
told
them
about
a
situation
that
the
therapist
said,
didn't
you
see
the
red
flags?
And
the
person
says,
Oh
yes,
I
did.
I
thought
it
was
a
carnival.
So
there
are
times
when
one
accidentally
gives
in
to
the
temptation
to
either
resent
or
fear.
Of
course,
I
still
do
it.
So
the
question
is
not,
Oh
my
God,
I've
got
a
new
resentment.
I
have
a
new
fear.
I
don't
know
what
to
do.
It's
the
same
resentment
and
fear
as
before.
It's
just
wearing
a
new
hat
and
it's
it's
got
different
wonky
makeup.
That's
all
that's
going
on.
It's
the
same
solution.
My
job
is
simply
to
practice
it.
So
what
I
want
to
impress
on
people
at
this
point
in
the
program
is
they
now
have
a
solution
to
resentment.
They
now
have
a
solution
to
fit.
It's
simply
a
matter
of
getting
muscular
in
implementing
these
solutions.
Now,
about
sex.
I'll
get
to
the
end
of
the
sort
of
presentation
stuff,
and
then
we'll
do
the
questions
on
the
remainder
of
Step
4.
So
this
is
obviously
the
most
distasteful
of
the
three
inventories
so
far.
And
I
said,
but
actually
I
think
it's
the
most
straightforward
of
the
three.
We've
reviewed
our
own
conduct,
so
we're
not
interested
in
internal
narrative
or,
or,
or
analysis
or
anything
like
that.
We're
interested
in
behaviour
only
for
a
practical
point
of
view.
I
get
people
to
write
a
list
of
people
they've
had
relationships
with
STD
clinic.
Sometimes
they
have
a
form
for
you
to
fill
out.
It's
how
many
partners
have
you
had
since
your
last
visit?
And
it's
like
nought
123
to
five,
six
to
1011
to
100,
a
hundred
and
one
to
1000
more
than
1000.
So
sometimes
people
have
have
got
a
lot
of
time
on
their
hands
and
get
up
to
a
lot
of
mischief.
Now
people
obviously
very
alarmed
at
this
point
that
they're
going
to
have
to
rehash
the
gory
details
of
of
of
endless
escapades.
Now,
of
course,
the
major
relationships
need
to
be
looked
at
individually,
although
the,
you
know,
boss
level
hack
is
that
probably
all
the
same.
In
terms
of
conduct,
people's
playbook
usually
doesn't
vary
very
much
unless
you're
extending
over
a
very
long
period
of
time.
But
then
you
know
to
to
to
bundle
together
the
one
night
stands,
to
bundle
together
the
colleagues
you've
mistakenly
flirted
with,
the
people
whose
sexual
advances
you
have
rebuffed,
how
you
behave
in
terms
of
how
you
look
at
people
in
public.
You
can
you
can
group
the
behaviour
under
categories
so
that
there
aren't
that
many
things
to
write
about.
And
this
is
simply
this
is
a
good
straightforward
inventory.
Where
have
we
been
selfish?
That's
where
I
put
my
interests
ahead
of
someone
else's.
Dishonest.
That's
outright
deceit,
telling
lies,
misrepresentation,
omission
or
delusion,
or
inconsiderate,
outright
failure
to
consider
someone
else's
interests.
Who
would
we
hurt?
Did
we
unjustifiably
arouse
jealousy,
suspicion,
or
bitterness?
That's
interesting.
The
reason
it's
unjustifiably
is
because
there
are
times
when
innocent
action
will
arouse
jealousy,
suspicion
and
bitterness
in
people
who
before
we
met
them
were
already
jealous,
suspicious
and
bitter
and
are
and
and
so
a
typical
thing
is
when
someone
you
know
goes
to
a
a
meetings
and
there
are
the
half
comes
back
sort
of
sniffing
their
collars
to
see
who
they've
been
cavorting
with
at
the
a
a
meeting.
So
we're
interested
in
unjustifiable
arousing
of
those
things.
Where
will
we
at
fault?
What
should
we
have
done
instead?
If
you
don't
know
what
you
should
have
done
instead,
wait
till
you
finish
the
Step
4.
Deal
with
that
and
the
Step
5
says
people
can't
figure
it
out.
That's
fine.
Most
people
can't.
So
if
the
important
point
was
Step
4,
nothing
counted
but
honesty
and
thoroughness,
which
means
you
know,
accuracy
and
lots
of
other
wonderful
qualities.
Well,
if
you
can
make
it
accurate,
great.
But
if
you
if,
if,
if
it's
the
best
you
can
come
up
with,
that's
OK
too.
Which
I
think
is
an
interesting
take.
My
job
is
to
systematically
ask
myself
a
bunch
of
questions,
and
having
asked
the
questions
and
listened
quietly
to
the
answers
that
my
own
mind
gives
me,
writing
them
down,
if
you
ask
the
questions,
you're
sick.
Quietly,
you
listen
for
the
answers,
you
write
them
down,
you've
done
a
good
job.
Even
if
it's
a
dog,
even
if
it's
actually
a
dog's
dinner.
You've
done
your
part.
Yeah,
You
can
spend
the
rest
of
your
life
getting
it
kind
of
accurate
and
neat
and
tidy
and
categorized
and
alphabetized
and
the
Harvard
outline.
You
don't
need
to
do
that
at
this
point.
The
main
job
here
is
to
be
thorough
and
accurate.
Now
the
next
bit
is
the
uh,
we're
really
hitting
gold
here.
In
this
way,
we
tried
to
shape
the
sane
and
sound
ideal
for
our
future
sex
life.
We
subjected
each
relation
to
this
test
with
its
selfish
a
lot.
And
and
here's
the
key.
We
asked
God
to
mold
our
ideals
for
what
attitudes
and
actions
or
beliefs,
thinking
and
actions.
Sometimes
attitudes
and
actions
A
A
is
the
simplest
way
of
doing
it.
We
asked
God
to
mold
our
ideals
and
help
us
live
up
to
them.
We
remembered
always
that
our
sex
powers
were
God-given
and
therefore
good,
neither
to
be
used
lightly
or
selfishly,
nor
to
be
despised
or
loathed.
Then
it
talks
about
a
very
intra
couple
of
interesting
points.
Whatever
our
ideal
turns
out
to
be,
we
must
be
willing
to
create,
award
it,
and
then
in
treating,
in
other
words,
we
treat
sex
as
we
would
any
other
problem.
Now
it
hasn't
told
you
in
the
book
so
far,
this
is
how
you
handle
a
problem,
but
now
it
tells
you
how
to
handle
sex.
Is
it?
Or
by
the
way,
in
other
words,
we
treat
sex
as
we
would
any
other
problem.
In
other
words,
you
can
reverse
engineer
this
and
say,
oh,
oh,
so
this
is
how
I
handle
a
problem.
I
go
to
God.
I
ask
God,
what
is
my
ideal
here?
What
attitude
should
I
adopt?
What
action
should
I
take?
I'm
not
going
to
get
it
right
straight
away,
but
I'm
willing
to
grow
towards
it.
And
so
we're
now,
what
are
we
Page
69,
we're
now
6
pages
into
the
program
and
we
have
an
adequate,
sufficient
and
complete
solution
A
to
resentment,
B
to
fear,
3
to
problems
where
6
pages
in
and
there
is
never
any
need
to
ever
really
have
a
resentment,
a
persistent
resentment
fill
problem
again,
6
pages
in.
It's
it's,
it's
not
hiding
this
anywhere.
And
it's
the
reason
I,
I'm
harping
on
about
that
is
because
the
ego
casts
a
sort
of
spell
of
amnesia.
I
don't
know
if
you've
ever
been
in
a
conversation
with
a
sponsee
where
you
explain
something
very
carefully
and
then
30
seconds
later
they
say
something
and
they
understand
it.
They
totally
get
it.
30
seconds
later
they,
they
say
something
to
indicate
that
the
the
the
information
has
already
been
deleted,
just
got,
it's
just
gone.
And
you're
like,
Oh
my
God,
you've
totally
circled
back
to
the
original
problem
and
it's
like
nothing
has
been
said.
So
whilst
you're
like
building
structures,
the
ego
is
on
the
other
side
of
the
structure.
Whilst
you're
putting
bricks
and
mortar,
the
ego
is
on
the
other
side
with
this
little
team
of
munchkins.
No
disrespect
to
small
people,
I'm
pretty
small
myself.
The
month
the
egos,
munchkins
were
on
the
other
side,
hacking
away
at
the
mortar,
removing
the
bricks.
And
so
unless
you're
working
really
hard
at
this,
your
ego
is
just
going
to
delete
everything
that
you're
learning.
You've
really
got
to
work
hard
to
keep
the
structures
that
are
being
built
in
place
now.
I
was
like
this
at
many
years
sober,
not
basically
forgetting
I
already
have
a
solution
to
resentment.
I
already
have
a
solution
to
fear.
I
literally
already
have
a
solution
to
problems.
Now
exactly
what
the
ideal
is
in
a
situation
that's
different.
That
can
be
complex
sometimes,
but
the
basic
structure
is
there.
Write
this
down
somewhere
useful.
A
friend
of
mine
in
a
A
used
to
write
everything
on
post
it
notes
and
they
were
around
his
whole
flat
in
the
bathroom
kitchen
just
reminding
him
to
do
basic
things
because
of
the
egos
perpetual
deletion
mechanism.
What
else
is
it
important
to
talk
about?
I
don't,
I,
I
mean,
one
could
talk
endlessly
about
those.
I
think
those
are
the
basic
instructions
I
give
people
for
these
step
for
the
Step
4.
The
last
thing
I'd
say
is
this
is
a
very
important
line
on
71.
If
you've
already
made
a
decision
and
an
inventory
of
your
grosser
handicaps,
whatever
they
are,
you
have
made
a
good
summer
grosser
than
others.
You
have
made
a
good
beginning.
And
I
think
this
is
really
good
evidence
that
they
didn't
want
to
take
four
years
doing
this
and
to
have
ring
binders
full
of
material.
You
want
to
get
a
basic
handle
on
what
the
problem
is
so
you
can
get
an
out
in
Step
5,
and
Step
5
is
going
to
be
the
next
topic.
I've
got
a
couple
of
corkers,
but
I'm
going
to,
I'm
going
to
leave
them
for
them,
so
I'm
going
to
stop
there.
On
the
presentation
side
of
things,
Alistair,
would
you
like
to
field
some
questions?
Thanks
very
much,
Tim.
Yeah,
with
that,
I'll
now
open
the
meeting
up
for
questions,
which
can
be
done
by
raised
hand
function
in
Zoom
or
you
can
message
me
through
the
chat
function.
I
will
ask
Tim
directly.
If
all
else
fails,
please
wave
your
hand
at
the
camera
and
I
will
try
to
come
to
you.
And
yeah,
with
that
bot
list,
James
has
a
question
already.
Thanks,
Alistair.
Thank
you,
Tim,
for
that
presentation.
It
was
great
to
hear
you.
And
the
thing
that
struck
me
when
you
were
talking
about
at
the
beginning
of
of
the
meeting,
when
you
were
explaining
this
idea
that
we
are
spirit,
we
are
not
physical
beings.
We
have,
we
are
not
our
body,
but
we
begin
to
realize
that
we
have
a
body,
but
we're
not
a
body,
that
we're
not
that
our
identity
has
been
in
the
physical
world,
in
the
material
world.
And
what
the
book
is
beginning
to
or
is
explaining
to
us
is
that
actually
we
are
spiritual
beings.
And
my
question
is
this,
I've
had
experiences
why
I've
gone
through
the
process
with
with
a
person
and
they
maybe
will
look
at
this
and
I'll
try
to
discuss
this
with
them.
And
I
kind
of,
they
just
don't
understand
what
I'm
talking,
or
they
just
look
at
me
blankly
or
they'll
say
yes
and
then
just
change
the
subject
and
we'll
go
back
to
it.
And
I
think
the
reason
I'm
asking
this
is
because
for
me,
and
I
think
for
quite
a
lot
of
people,
it's
quite
a
revolutionary
concept.
It's
a
pretty
different
way
of
looking
at
reality
from
when
we're
drinking.
And
my
question
is,
do
you
think
it's
useful
to
suggest
things
like
Eckhart
Tolle
or
to
our
other
spiritual
literature
to
help
people
begin
to
realize
this?
Or
do
you
think
it's
best
to
just
keep
going
through
the
process?
And
like
you
said
later
on
in
the
in
your
presentation,
we
need
to
remind
ourselves
of
these
things
because
the
ego
just
will,
just
will
just
forget
them.
That's
it.
There's
there
are
lots
of
questions
in
there.
So
I'll
deal
with
them
systematically
if
I
can.
So
first
of
all,
to
see
things
differently,
you've
got
to
want
to
see
things
differently.
If
you
don't
want
to
see
things
differently,
you're
not
going
to,
you're
going
to
resist.
Why
would
someone?
And
so
the
question
is
with
the
willingness
side
of
things
to
see
things
differently,
there's
a
there's
a
little
basic
set
of
corrective
measures
going
to
fly.
So
you
save
the
person.
Do
you
like
how
you
feel?
Well,
no,
I
don't
like
how
I
feel.
OK,
good.
We've
got
that
one
sort
of.
So
you
don't
like
how
you
feel.
Is
it
safe
to
say
that
how
you
feel
is
coming
from
how
you
view
the
world?
Because,
well,
other
people
see
the
same
world
in
a
different
way
and
feel
differently?
So,
so
yes,
it's,
it's
people
can
usually
are
usually
down
with
that.
They,
they,
they
can
usually
come
up
with
some
examples
of
situations
where
different
people
look
at
the
same
situation
in
a
different
way
and
have
a
different
experience
of
it.
You
know,
you
know
when
you
go
to
a
hotel
and
you
have
a
lovely
time
and
then
you
read
the
hotel
reviews
afterwards
and
you
wouldn't
recognize
the
hotel
from
the
description
or
the
other
way
around,
you
have
a
terrible
experience
and
all
these
wonderful
reviews.
So
if
you
can
establish
that
the
way
the
person
feels,
the
way
I
feel
is
to
do
with
the
way
I'm
looking
at
things,
you
don't,
well,
look
at
it
like
this
instead,
now
you
have
to
go
there
bit
by
bit.
You
say,
first
of
all,
wouldn't
it
be
to
your
advantage
to
look
at
things
differently?
Wouldn't
you
want
to
look
at,
I'm
not
saying
you're
willing
to
look
at
things
differently,
but
don't
you
kind
of
hope
you
could
look
at
this
differently?
I
mean,
because
you
might
be
happier
then.
Do
you
want
to
be
happy?
Remember
you
said
you
wanted
to
be
happy.
Yes,
still
want
to
be
happy.
So
you
gradually
edge
towards
it.
And
then
you
say,
well,
do
you
think
maybe
there
is
a
different
way
of
looking
at
this?
And
then
maybe
you
do
want
to
have
that.
Do
you
actually
want
that
different
way
of
looking
at
things?
And
then
what
can
you
hurt?
What
could
it
hurt
to
ask
how
to
look
at
this
differently?
And
then
when
it's
presented,
what,
how
about
you
just
try
it
for
a
while,
Try
looking
at
things
differently
for
a
while
and
see
what
results
you
get.
So
you
don't
with
these
ideas,
you
don't
analyze
them
as,
as
Earl
Purdy
says,
analyzes
anal
lies.
You,
you,
you
don't
want
to.
I
know,
sorry
about
that.
I
don't
know
if
you've
had
your
tea
yet.
But
you
don't
want
to
analyse
the
ideas.
You
want
to
see
if
the
ideas
are
understood
in
principle.
But
often
these
spiritual
ideas,
although
they're
radical,
they're
actually
remarkably
simple.
They're
just
unwelcome.
Make
a
distinction
between
that
which
is
not
understood
and
that
which
is
not.
Welcome.
Now,
to
move
from
having
this
sort
of
theoretical
understanding
to
lived
experience,
you've
got
to
then
do
it.
If
you
described
France
to
someone
who
has
never
been
to
France,
there
is
no
way
you
could
adequately
describe
it.
You've
actually
got
to
go
to
France
to
experience
what
Parisians
are
like
to
actually,
if
you've
been
to
or
lived
in
Paris,
you'll
know
what
I
mean
by
that.
I
say
that
having
a
Parisian
side
of
the
family,
Needless
to
say.
But
the
point
is,
you
can
describe
something
to
your
heart's
content,
but
the
person
won't
understand
it
until
they
experience
it.
So
trying
to
get
it
fully
understood
before
they
apply
is
not
going
to
work.
Do
you
understand
the
idea?
There
are
ways
into
this
idea
that
you
are
not
your
body,
that
you
are
caught.
You,
you
go
in
via
the
notion
of
consciousness.
So
you
look
at
the
fact
that
you
get
someone,
for
instance,
sit
for
a
few
minutes
and
just
observe
their
thoughts
from
the
outside,
the
thoughts
of
their
mind
throws
at
them
from
the
outside.
So,
so
you
say,
OK,
so
you
you're
now
describing
the
thoughts
that
you've
just
had
and
the
experience
you
had
of
having
those
thoughts.
So
who
is
the
you
that
is
observing
the
thoughts?
It
can't
be
the
thought
there's
something
else
going
on
here.
You
look
at
the
fact
that
and
this,
the
triple
notion
of
identity,
value
and
purpose.
Who
are
you?
How
much
you
worth
and
what's
your
purpose?
The
value
thing
is
a
good
way
that's
usually
the
most
the
the
simplest
way
in
is
it's
very
common
for
people
to
to
report
having
low
self
worth
or
or
to
report
their
their
opinion.
Other
people
are
of
inferior
worth
one
way
or
another.
And
then
you
get,
and
this
example
always
works.
You
give
an
example,
you
know,
when
you're
out
and
about
and
you
see
a
little
little
class
of
primary
school
children
being
sort
of
led
and
shepherded
on
some
sort
of
expedition
somewhere
where
they're
little
jerkins
all
holding
hands.
And
they're,
it's
always
completely
delightful
up
to
a
certain
age.
Of
course
after
that
age
it
becomes
obnoxious,
but
so
I
said
primary
school
children,
not
15
year
olds.
So,
you
know,
when
they're
4567
and
you
say
to
the
person,
well,
do
you
think
those
children
each
have
a
different
worth
or
do
you
think
that
all
of
infinite
worth,
do
you
think
they're
all
infinitely
valuable?
And
everyone?
I've
never
met
anyone
that
has
a
problem
with
that
idea
that
all
of
those
little
children
are
of
infinite
worth,
that
to
lose
one
of
them
would
be
an
appalling
tragedy
and
that
you
couldn't
choose
between
them.
They're
all,
they're
all
extraordinary,
wonderful
creatures.
And
you
say,
well,
so
you
know
the
truth
already.
You
just
don't
want
to
apply
it
universally.
You're
fine
to
apply
it
to
children
and
maybe
kittens
or
puppies
or,
or
or
what
are
those?
South
America,
Kathy
Barras?
But
you're
just
not,
you're
not
happy
to
do
that
with
people
that
vote
differently
than
you.
OK,
so
so
that
what
we've
established
is
you
already
know
the
truth,
you're
just
applying
it
inconsistently.
As
for
getting
different
angles,
you
have
to
remember
an
early
a
A.
They
said
they
didn't
have
the
big
book
in
the
first
four
years.
And
even
after
that,
yes,
they
used
the
big
book,
but
boy
did
they
use
a
whole
load
of
other
spiritual
resources.
It
was
basically
you're
buying
up.
You're
buying
in
to
aware
of
living,
which
is
#1
spirit,
as
it
says
in
the
doctor's
opinion,
spiritual
and
altruistic.
Now
you
can't
impose
someone's
spirituality
on
them,
but
you
can,
you
can
legitimately
say
you
need
to
do
some
exploring,
Buster.
You
know,
if
you're
a
novice
in
this
area,
you
need
to
put
some
time
in,
read
some
stuff,
listen
to
some
stuff,
read
some,
watch
some
stuff,
see
what
investigate.
You
know,
if
you've
got
a
little
bit
of
religion
in
the
past,
maybe
investigate
that
religion,
investigate
another
religion,
go
to
the
local
Buddhist
centre.
And
most
people,
if
they
start
down
that
path,
pretty
soon
these
ideas,
the
notion
of
alien
ideas
which
are
actually
helpful,
becomes
acceptable
pretty
quickly.
But
it's
it
all
goes
back
to
that
original
willingness.
If
people
are
willing
to
look
at
things
differently,
then
frankly,
they'll
swallow
anything.
So
there
we
go.
Does
that
answer
your
question,
James?
Yes,
thank
you,
Harry.
Hey,
everyone.
I'm
Harry.
I'm
an
alcoholic.
Thanks,
Tim,
and
thanks
James
for
that
question.
Is
it
maybe
this
is
kind
of
a
counterpoint
to
what
James
said
or
extension?
So
the
the,
the
most
I've
taken
a
few
people
through
Step
4
now
and
the
most
persistently
difficult
thing
about
guiding
someone
for
it
for
me
is
most
of
the
most
of
the
people
I've
taken
through
have
some
level
of
likes,
let's
call
it
sophistication,
right?
So,
and
you
said
before,
the
difficulty
we're
going
through
Step
4
is
not
only
are
you
doing
the
Step
4,
you
also
usually
learning
the
step
four
while
you're
doing
it.
That
makes
it
hard.
One
of
the
hardest
things
about
SO
trying
to
get
this
done
to
concise
question.
My
observation
is
that
the
difficulty
in
learning
the
technique
is
because
people
try
to
apply
lots
of
pop
psychology
or
psychology
and
therapy
talk
as
we
start
to
get
into
it.
So
the,
the
idea
will
come
in
that
we
need
to
be
starting
to
peel
away.
They
need
to
be
starting
to
peel
away
layers
of
the
onion.
There'll
also
be
other
things
about
how
we
can't
this
idea
that
we're
selfish
actually
isn't
very
helpful
at
all
because
I've
got
such
low
self
esteem
that
we
need,
you
know,
we
can't
be
doing
this.
So
I
think
actually
my,
the
core
of
my
question
is
I'm
always
reluctant
to
try
and
persuade
or
convince
people
of
things.
Yeah.
And
so,
but
when
I
get
into
this
part
of
the
program,
I'm
like,
they
get
stuck
because
they
want
to
do
it
their
way.
And
I
think
there's
enough
questions.
You're
going
to
pick
out
some
questions
from
that.
Tim,
is
that.
Yeah,
Nightmare.
OK,
so
one
thing.
OK,
therapy
let's.
I
don't
know
if
we
should
turn
off
the
recording
for
this.
Maybe
not.
I
hope
I'm
not
going
to
say
anything
too
controversial.
The
best,
the
best
advice
I've
ever
heard
given
as
to
what
you
say
to
a
sponsee
that
is
about
to
do
therapy.
Great,
go
and
do
it.
And
what
we
will
do,
all
the
things
you
learn,
bring
them
back
here
and
we'll
use
them
as
information
to
plug
into
your
step
four
and
your
step
8.
So
you're
integrating
the
two.
You're
integrating
the
two
things.
That
covers
most
things
actually.
So
we'll
take
what
you
learn
from
therapy
and
we'll
work
the
steps
on
it.
How
about
that
where
you
have?
You
do
have
an
occasional
collision
and
the
low
self
worth
one
is
a
good
example.
And
this
can
take,
I
suppose
there
are
two
ways
of
coming
this,
one
way
of
coming
at
this.
And
sometimes
you
have
to
do
this.
You
say,
look,
you're
trying
to,
you're
trying
to
adopt
two
systems
for
so
solving
your
whole
life
at
once.
And
that's
not
going
to
work.
You
might
want
to
pick
one
for
now.
So
doing
the
steps
for
six
months
just
which
is
it
takes.
If
you
do
just
do
the
steps
and
you
really
put
your
back
into
it.
You
get
up
early
on
Saturday
and
Sunday,
you
get
up
at
6:00
AM.
You
spend
a
few
hours
on
step
work
you've
done.
By
10:00
AM
you
literally
still
have
the
whole
day
left,
but
you've
done
4
hours
of
step.
You
can
get
through
it
in
three
months.
That's
not
a
huge
sacrifice
to
put
a
pause
on
some
other
process,
frankly.
Like
you've
been
fucked
up
for
40
years.
Another
three
months
is
not
going
to
another
three
months
delay.
Oh,
you're
worried
about
that
now?
Or
why
didn't
you
go
into
therapy
30
years
ago?
Seriously,
now
it's
urgent.
You
can
wait
three
months
while
you're
doing
this
process
and
hopefully
not
dive
alcoholism
in
the
meantime.
Or
maybe
go
and
do
therapy.
And
if
it
doesn't
work,
come
back
here
fine.
It's
this.
I'm
not,
you
know,
do
whatever
you
want,
but
try
and
do
one
thing.
Don't
try
and
ride
two
horses
at
once.
If
if
therapy
is
treated
as
a
now
want
a
friend
of
mine
then
this
I
think
was
super
valid.
The
way
into
the
inventories
is
through
emotion,
resentment,
fear
under
sex
imagery,
guilt
and
shame.
If
you
can't
feel
anything
because
you've
so
successfully
dissociated
for
a
decade
or
two,
you
know
the
last
thing
you
can
remember
feeling
was
in
the
middle
of
the
first
Gulf
War,
That
kind
of
thing.
Then
therapy
can
be
super
helpful
in
getting
you
in
touch
with
your
feelings
so
that
you
can
even
start
to
do
the
inventories
in
the
first
place
if
you
want.
Sometimes
people
go
to
therapy
for
a
very,
very
specific,
detailed
purpose,
a
particular
event
or
situation,
and
that
can
be
integrated
very,
very
easily.
But
I
think
the
difficulty
with
therapy,
and
it's
not
because
the
therapy
is
wrong
or
bad,
quite
the
reverse.
But
where
does
therapy?
Is
it
attempting
to
inculcate
a
worldview
and
belief
system?
That's
where
you
have
a
problem
because
you're
going
to
have
a,
because
you're
trying
to
adopt
A
new
world
view
and
belief
system
with
the
program.
You
can't
do
2
at
once
unless
they,
unless
they're
sort
of
interlocking
like
Meccano
pieces
or
something.
And,
and
sometimes
they
are.
Sometimes
people
go
to
a
therapist
who's
like
super
spiritual,
super
12
step,
He'll
go
to
therapist
to
a
course
of
miracles
practitioners.
People
go
to
therapists
who
are
Christian
or
or
rabbi
to
a
therapist.
There
are
all
sorts
of
things
that
people
will
do
where
it
totally
interlocks.
But
sometimes
people
go
to
therapy
and
I've
had
friends
who've
been
told
this.
All
the
people
in
your
life
that
upset
you,
you
need
to
tell
them
what
they're
doing
wrong
to
upset
you.
Now
that's
a
legitimate
approach.
Except
what
results
are
you
getting
from
doing
that?
How's
that
going
down?
Is
that
working
out
well
for
you?
Is
that
improving
your
relationships?
Maybe
it
does.
Some
people
report
that
literally
helps
but
that's
not
been
my
experience
with
the
sometimes
you
have
to
resolve
the
collision.
A
good
example
is
the
selfishness
and
the
low
self
worthy
with
the
with
your
if
any
of
you
are
in
Alanon,
I'm
not
going
to
out
anyone,
but
if
if
any
of
you
are
are
in
Allenon
and
you
have
Alan
on
sponsees,
one
of
the
big
Al
Anon
brokennesses
is
oh,
don't
I
mean,
my
mother
is
a
good
example.
You
know
how
many
how
many
French
mothers
does
it
take
to
change
a
light
bulb
or
don't
worry,
you
go
out,
enjoy
yourself
with
your
friends.
I'll
sit
here
in
the
dark,
the
martyrdom
like
so
not
not
taking
responsibility
of
yourself,
neglecting
yourself.
And
part
of
the
solution
is
this
dreaded
word
self-care.
So
actually
doing
so,
learning
to
say
no
to
bullshit
requests
from
crazy
manipulative
narcissists
is
a
really
helpful
tool
of
recovery.
But
that's
not
selfishness,
that's
common
sense.
That's
being
a
grown
up
and
not
being
a
crazy,
unrecovered
Alanon
Marta.
Selfishness.
This
is
where
you
have
to
define
the
terms.
Selfishness
is
illegitimately
putting
my
interests
ahead
of
other
peoples,
legitimately
putting
your
interests
ahead
of
other
people's
totally
fine.
So
sometimes
people
in
a
a
so
you
can
call
me
anytime,
day
or
night,
not
me.
When
the
phone
goes
off,
it
stays
off.
If
you
want
something,
if
you
have
crises
that
turn
the
morning,
you're
going
to
have
to
find
someone
who's
up
at
2:00
in
the
morning.
Because
I'm
not,
I'm
not.
So
sometimes
it's
the,
the
reason
you
get
a
conflict
is
not
because
there's
a
conflict,
but
because
the
same
terms
are
being
used
with
different
definitions.
So
secondly,
and
this
is
a
very
common,
this
is
a
very
common
objection
to
doing
step
four.
And
it
may
come
from
therapy,
it
may
come
from
somewhere
else
that
you're
being
like
super
hard
on
yourself
by
doing
this.
Now
a
couple
of
points.
First
of
all,
we're
not
being
hard
on
ourselves.
What
we're
being
hard
on
is
the
software
that
was
loaded
into
us
or
was
programmed
by
the
family,
the
society,
the
power
structures
we
grew
up
in.
What
we're
inventorying
is
not
us.
We're
inventory
the
bullshit
method
of
living,
which
has
not
worked.
So
if
we
feel
bad
about
the
things
that
we're
finding
on
there
we've
mistaken
ourselves
for,
it's
like,
well,
you've
mistaken
yourself.
Your
program
programming.
You
are
not
your
programming.
So
you're
being
hard
on
the,
on
the
bad
wisdom,
Suzanne
Vega
line.
You've
been,
what
we're
being
hard
on
is
the
bad
wisdom
that
was
passed
down
on
us.
We're,
we're
alone
to
look
at
that
and
saying,
OK,
these
values
that
I
was
given,
like
I,
I'll
give
you
one
when
I
was
like
12
or
something,
I
came
first
in
something
and
my
mother
said,
ah,
now
you've
come
first
in
this.
That
means
you
can
do
it.
That
means
you
must
come
first
every
single
time,
and
if
you
don't,
it
is
because
you
did
not
try
hard
enough.
That
was
literally
this
is
not
subliminal.
This
was
not
covertly
telegraphed.
This
was
explicitly
set
out
as
the
principle
I
should
live
by.
My
job
is
to
beat
everyone
else
at
everything
the
whole
time,
and
if
I
fail,
it's
my
fault
because
I'm
Lizzy.
Lizzie.
By
the
way,
my
family,
you
can
always
tell
who
the
Alcoholics
are.
They're
the
people
that
my
mother
describes
or
other
people
describe
as
lazy.
If
they're
described
as
lazy,
they
probably
drink
a
little
more
than
is
strictly
good
for
them
anyway.
But
the
point
is
we're
not
being
hard.
First
of
all,
we're
not
being
hard
on
ourselves
because
we're
we're
it's
like
getting
like
if
you've
got
the
plumber
in
to
examine
and
fix
your
plumbing,
you
wouldn't
say,
oh,
don't
get
the
plumber
in.
He's
going
to
criticize
your
plumbing
and
you
yourself
worth
is
bad
enough
already.
You
don't
want
just
live
with
the
bar.
But
it
makes
no
sense
and
it
makes
no
more
sense
here
either.
Secondly,
the
purpose
is
to
get
this
crap.
The
crap
is
there
already
and
we're
supposed
to.
We're
not
analyzing,
we're
setting
forth
the
stuff,
which
is
super
apparent.
The
one
line
you
have
to
pull
sometimes
is
on
page
58.
And
you
do
this
with
I've
had
sponsees,
I'm
not
going
to
name
names.
I've
had
sponsees
who
whenever
you
say
something
and
say,
yeah,
but
you
said
last
week
or
yeah,
but
at
Hind
Street
they
say,
or
at
Joys
of
Recovery,
they
say
on
my
last
sponsor
said
that
or
Eckhart
Tolle
says
that
or,
and
they
they
come
back
with
something
else.
And
it's
suddenly
your
job
to
reconcile
you,
what
you
have
just
said
with
the
aggregate
of
some
weird
hotchpotch
of
completely
inconsistent
ideas
and
belief
systems
that
they've
collected
like
a
magnet
that's
been
dragged
through
the
junkyard
of
life
for
the
last
50
years.
And
suddenly
it's
your
job
to
reconcile
the
new
idea
with
this
whole
kind
of
massive
structure,
like
an
explosion
has
gone
off
and
in
a
in
a
shipyard.
No,
no,
no,
no,
no.
What
you
want
to
do
is
say
page
58
we
had
to
let
go
of
our
old
ideas,
all
of
them.
So
whatever
you've
learnt
before,
put
it
on
the
shelf.
Sister.
If
anything
you've
learned
before
is
valuable,
then
over
time
you'll
figure
out
how,
if
and
how
it's
consistent.
Let's
not
try
and
reconcile
it
now.
That
set
forth
a
new
way
of
looking
at
things,
and
we
need
a
blank
sheet
of
paper
to
do
it.
If
you
pour
something
into
a
cup
which
is
full
of
something
already,
you
can't
pour
anything
in.
You
can't.
There's
an
important
principle
from
A
Course
in
Miracles.
You
don't
take
truth
to
error,
you
take
error
and
you
place
it
in
a
bath
of
truth
to
wash
it
and
to
give
an
image
for
that.
If
you've
got,
if
you've
got
dirty
water
and
you
add
clean
water
to
it,
you
don't,
it
doesn't
clean
the
water,
you
just
end
up
with
more
dirty
water.
So
you've
got
you've
especially
people
have
got
a
lot
of
recovery
behind
them.
It's
always
a
nightmare
sponsoring
people
who've
been
in
a
A
for
20
years
or
30
years
because
it's
almost
impossible
to
get
the
whole
system
set
aside
that
you
have
to
do
that,
otherwise
it
ain't
gonna
go
in.
So
that's
that's
what
I've
got
on
those
18
questions.
Thanks,
Tim.
Nobody
else
has
got
a
question.
I'd
like
to.
Oh,
Philip,
I
love
it
to
you.
Oh,
hi
and
thanks
so
much,
Tim.
Just
quickly
then,
so
are
you
essentially
saying
that
the
spiritual
awakening
offered
in
Step
12,
it
says
we're
going
to
have
one
as
the
result
of
doing
the
steps
is
a
change
of
mind
about
who
I
think
I
am?
You're
not.
Yeah,
absolutely.
Absolutely.
The
what?
What
one
lot?
I
mean
it.
I
quote
A
Course
in
Miracles
a
lot
because
I
happen
to
be
reading
it
a
lot,
like
five
years.
I
was
reading
something
else,
and
the
same
ideas
would
be
pouring
forth,
just
in
a
different
idiom.
So
whatever
you
read
is
just
going
to
be
the
channel
through
which
the
ideas
come.
So
this
is
not
course
a
miracle
specific.
It
just
happens
to
contain
some
useful
ideas
which
are
found
in
all
religions.
Just
little
legal
disclaimer
that.
But
what
it
talks
about
in
A
Course
in
Miracles
is
if
you're
on
the
battlefield,
if
you
know,
if
you've
ever
felt
in
your
life,
you're
like
you're
in
a
battlefield.
If
you're
on
the
battlefield,
you
can't
fix
the
battlefield.
You
need
to
be
lifted
above
the
battlefield.
And
first
of
all,
two
things
happen
once
you're
lifted
above
the
battlefield.
You
can't
be
hurt
by
anything
going
on
on
the
battlefield.
Secondly,
if
you
use
your
imagination,
but
you
imagine
the
difference
between
being
inside
a
battlefield
and
being
above
a
battlefield,
you
know
it.
To
mention
The
Lord
of
the
Rings,
again,
that
the
films,
the
scenes
which
are
shot
from
within
a
battle,
it's
impossible
to
figure
out
what's
going
on.
The
scenes
which
are
shot,
shot
from
above
the
battlefield,
you
can
totally
see
the
strategies
playing
out.
And
it's
exactly
the
same
with
our
lives
and
with,
well,
just
the
phenomenon
of
the
material
universe.
If
you're
above
the
battlefield,
suddenly
you
see
what's
going
on.
Or
like
in
London,
where
you
you
can't
figure
out
how
all
the
different
tube
stations
relate
to
each
other
until
you
see
a
map
and
then
it
becomes
clear.
So
that
I
think
the
job
of
the
12
steps
is
to
lift
us
above
the
battlefield
so
we
can
see
things
clearly
and
then
we
can
visit
back
in
kind
of
non
corporeal
form
in
the
battlefield
to
get
shit
done,
but
without
being
hurt
by
it.
That's
the
difference.
So
it's
not
that
we
don't
we
don't
separate
ourselves
from
the
material
world.
The
material
world
is
the
place
where
the
games
get
played
out,
the
purposes
fulfilled.
But
it's
from
a
recognition
that
our
real
home
is
elsewhere
and
we're
just
visiting
back
here.
And
that's
there's
Anne
Lamott.
Anne
Lamott
LAMOTT
Anne
Lamott
is
very,
very
good
on
on
the
on
the
philosophy
of
all
of
this
in
a
very,
very
easy
to
read
way.
She
she
refers
to
death
as
a
fairly
major
change
of
address.
Not
even
the
most
made.
Yeah,
a
fairly
major
change
of
address.
So
that
that's
what
I've
got
on
that.
Alistair,
I
think
you
had
a
question.
I
did.
Thank
you.
Was
regarding
the
sane
and
sound
sex
ideal.
Do
you
whether,
if
you're
working
with
a
sponsee,
do
you
tend,
do
you
go
through
that
with
them?
I've
got
a
strong
stomach,
yes.
Although
what
what
I
tend
to
do,
I've
got
some
notes
which
I've
compiled
over
the
years
from
basically
all
the
useful
things
I've
ever
been
told
by
people
who
are
in
successful
long-term
relationships.
So
I
rather
than
getting
people
to
come
up
with
something
themselves,
I
say
here,
look
at
this,
pick
half
a
dozen
things
you
might
be
useful
from
the
list,
and
then
let's
just
go
with
that.
And
then
you
end
up
with
something
pretty
reasonable.
And
what
you
might
want
is
like
if
they're
single,
ideals
for
dating,
if
they're,
if
they're
in
a
relationship.
So
the
same
and
sound
ideals
have
to
be
tailored
to
the
situation
the
person
is
in.
But
if
you
give
them
stock
to
pick
from
and
stuff
to
read,
I
mean,
there
are
people
who
are
very
good
on
relationships.
Rabbi
Harold
Kushner,
Manus
Friedman,
there
are
all
sorts
of
other
spiritual
writers
who
write
about
relationships
to
get
to
read
some
stuff,
to
listen
to
some
stuff,
and
to
get
ideas
from
the
outside,
not
to
try
to
figure
it
out
themselves.
Otherwise
they'll
do
what
Mark
Houston
refers
to
as
recreating
yourself
in
your
own
image
just
with
this
like,
spiritual
glow
about
you.
But
essentially
you're
still
doing
the
same
thing,
so
that's
where
you'll
be
careful
of
the
same
and
sound
ideals.
Thank
you.
Is
there
any
other?
Questions
for
Tim
I
will
just
jump
into
the
chat
is
linked
to
recordings
from
previous
meetings
with
Tim
Shedd
and
one
from
another
LON
speaker.
Is
there
anyone
else
in
the
question?
Should
we?
OK,
Harry.
And
they
come
in
with
just
one
specific
one.
So
in
the
12
and
12,
is
it
under
step
four
or
under
steps
1011
is
specific
suggestion
to
put
assets
along
with
defects
And
I'm
wondering
if
you've
had
if
that
if
you've
ever
found
that
helpful
to
do
that
sort
of
thing.
I'll
try
and
have
this
quickly.
The
answer
is
no,
that's
quick.
But
the
reason
why
is
because
as
soon
as
you
are
down
with
the
notion
that
what
you're,
it's
like
when
you
clean
a
flat,
you
don't
inventory
the
things
which
are
already
clean.
You
find
what
is
dirty
and
you
clean
what
is
dirty.
The
notion
that
the
12:00
and
12:00
I
think
is
spiritually
off
in
all
sorts
of
ways.
I,
my
personal
view
is
that
the
notion
of
original
sin
runs
through
the
whole
thing.
And
I
personally,
I
find
that
a
little
bit
poisonous.
And
the
idea
that
your,
your
value
is
somehow
a
balance
sheet
of
assets
and
liabilities
and
you
have
this
horrible
mixture
of
it's
just
awful.
It's
awful.
A
much
better
vision
is
that
we're
of
infinite
value,
but
we
just
get
stuff
wrong
a
lot.
We
just
make
some
mistakes.
We
make
some
really
big
mistakes,
but
that's
only
because,
you
know,
we
can
be
a
bit
dumb
and
we
can
be
misled
and
frightened
and
so
on.
That's
it's
a
totally
different,
the
spiritual
model
is
totally
different
between
the
12
and
12
and
the
big
book,
and
you
cannot
reconcile
the
two.
There
are
bits
which
are
useful
in
the
12
and
12
that
the
underlying
philosophy
is
hardcore
Catholic
philosophy,
which
came
from
Father
Ed
Dowley.
It's
it's
strictly
denominational.
One
tiny
thing
on
low
self
worth.
There
is
such
a
thing
as
low
self
worth,
and
you
get
it
in
people
who
are
treated
very
badly
and
believe
they
deserve
it.
That's
low
self
worth
in
almost
every.
And
I've
sponsored
people
who
are
like
that.
And
that
requires
a
huge
amount
of
encouragement
and
nurturing
and
building
the
ability
to
withstand
attack
and
the
ability
to
set
boundaries
of
all
sorts
of
different
natures.
But
what
you
largely
get
in
Alcoholics
is
it
feels
like
low
self
worth.
But
it's
the
it's
the
someone
said
about
Americans
that
no
American
believes
that
he
or
she
is
actually
poor.
They
consider
themselves
to
be
temporarily
embarrassed
millionaires,
that
the
right,
the
rightful
place.
And
this
isn't
the
12
and
12
in
which
American
boy
doesn't
want
to
be
the
president.
The
idea
is,
is
is
a
very
common
one
that
what
feels
like
low
self
worth
is
a
feeling
of
guilt,
shame
and
embarrassment
because
I
haven't
managed
to
outdo
everyone
else,
which
is
my
true
place.
So
Clancy
describes
as
perfectly.
He
says
if
you
treat
me
special,
I
feel
OK.
If
you
treat
me
OK,
I
feel
terrible.
And
the
way
to
test
whether
it's
low
self
worth
or
pride
for
a
failure
to
live
up
to
your
ambitions,
to
dominate
the
entire
world,
is
to
say
OK.
Do
you
find
the
following
statement
a
threat
or
a
comfort?
You
are
perfectly
average.
You
are
perfectly
ordinary.
You
do
not
stand
out
in
any
way.
You
are
one
of
the
crowd.
You
are
one
of
seven
billion
people
on
the
planet
with
the
usual
mix
of
of,
you
know,
joys
and
problems,
neither
particularly
remarkable,
neither
for
great
virtues
or
great
defects.
In
other
words,
you
are
simply
an
ordinary
human
being,
someone
who's
got
most
self
worth
is
that's
going
to
be,
that's
going
to
be
healing
ointment.
Someone
that's
got
hurt,
pride
will
be
that.
Yeah,
the
smell
which
will
creep
across
their
face
when
you
try
that
one
on.
Then
you
find
out
the
nature
of
the
beast,
what's
really
going
on.
Thanks,
Tim.
And
with
that,
I'll,
I'll
ask
if
you
if
you
could
close
the
meeting
with
the
Serenity
Prayer,
please.
Yes.
Would
you
please
help
me
close
with
the
Serenity
prayer?
God,
grant
me
the
serenity.
Serenity.
That's
the
thing
that
I've
changed
things.
I
can't
foresee
things.
And
then
we
just
know
the
difference.
Thanks,
Tim.
Thanks,
everyone.
Thanks,
Alistair.
Thank
you.