The topic of step 4 at a Sponsorship through the 12 steps workshop in London, UK
Thank
you
to
set
the
time
for
the
meeting,
I
will
read
an
extract
from
Chapter
7,
page
89.
Working
with
others
Working
with
others
practical
experience
shows
that
nothing
will
so
much
ensure
immunity
from
drinking
as
intensive
work
with
other
Alcoholics.
It
works
when
other
activities
fail.
This
is
our
12th
suggestion.
Carry
this
message
to
other
Alcoholics.
You
can
help
when
no
one
else
can.
You
can
secure
their
confidence.
When
others
fail,
remember
they
are
very
ill.
Life
will
take
on
new
meaning.
To
watch
people
recover,
to
see
them
help
others,
to
watch
loneliness
vanish.
To
see
a
fellowship
grow
up
about
you,
to
have
a
host
of
friends,
this
is
an
experience
you
must
not
miss.
We
know
you
will
not
want
to
miss
it.
Frequent
contact
with
newcomers
and
with
each
other
is
the
bright
spot
of
our
lives.
The
topic
of
tonight's
meeting
is
working
step
four
with
a
Swansea
and
Tim
will
share
anything
between
30
and
45
minutes
on
the
topic
and
after
which
the
floor
will
be
open
for
questions
rather
than
the
typical
sharing.
And
with
that,
I
will
now
hand
over
to
Tim.
Thank
you.
My
name's
Tim.
I'm
an
alcoholic.
Let
me
just.
Oh,
what
am
I
trying
to?
I'm
trying
to
share
the
screen.
It
looks
different
than
usual.
Here
we
go.
Let's
see
if
that
seems
to
have
worked.
There
we
go.
There
we
go.
Can
you
see
the
big
book
now?
Yeah,
good.
OK,
so
there
are
a
couple
of
you.
I'm
not
sure
I
know.
So
just
so
you
know
what
this
is
about,
Tim
Alcoholic
got
sober
24th
of
July
1993.
I
don't
know
if
I'm
a
good
sponsor,
but
I've
I'm
a
busy
sponsor.
So
that
that
bit
certainly
true.
I've
done
a
lot
of
it.
So
I
would
like
with
addiction,
just
because
you've
done
a
lot
of
it
doesn't
mean
you're
good
at
it
just
but
you
do
have
some
experience
back
there.
So
this
is
just
my
personal
experience.
I
don't
speak
on
behalf
of
a
a
if
it's
helpful,
great.
If
it
if
it's
not,
then
don't
come
back
and
tell
everyone
how
awful
I
am.
That's
just
fine
with
me.
So
next
we
launched
out
on
a
course
of
vigorous
action.
So
I
mean
you,
you
will
already
have
said
this
to
the
Swansea
that
they
need
to
when
taking
Step
3.
Be
prepared
for
concerted
action
until
it's
done,
until
steps
4
through
9
are
done.
And
I
would
liken
it
to
taking
a
trip
through
a
a
sort
of
dark
medieval
German
forest.
As
long
as
you
stick.
Has
to
be
German,
doesn't
it?
You
need
the
menace
without
it
being
German.
There's
no
French
forest,
you
know,
that's
a
Pleasington
time,
but
a
German
forest,
you
get
the
idea.
Dangers
on
every
side.
You
want
to
stick
to
the
path
and
get
through
it
as
quickly
as
possible.
The
path
is
torch
lit,
so
you're
fine.
Like
the
wolves
won't
get
you
as
long
as
you
stay
on
the
path.
But
if
you
dawdle,
you're
going
to
start
looking
into
the
darkness
and
then
the
darkness
will
start
to
look
back
at
you
and
then
you'll
start
to
exchange
with
the
darkness.
So
you
want
to
just
get
on
with
it.
And
what
they
usually
say
on
big
book
things
is
you
can't
launch
slowly.
You
know,
it's
got
a
slip
down
the,
the,
the
slip
way
into
the
sea.
If
it
if
it
stops
you,
it's
really
stuck
then
the
first
step
of
which
is
a
personal
house
cleaning
which
many
of
us
have
never
attempted.
Though
our
decision
step
three
was
a
vital
and
crucial
step,
it
could
have
little
permanent
effect
unless
at
once
another
indication
about
the
urgency
followed
by
a
strenuous
effort
to
face.
Strenuous.
What
does
that
mean
in
practice?
If
someone
is
working,
or
has
children
or
has
other
intense
obligations?
I
think
an
hour
a
day
on
non
working
days
and
two
hours
a
day
at
weekend
is
pretty
reasonable.
Get
it
out
of
the
way
first
thing
in
the
morning
and
then
you
spend
the
whole
day
smugly
telling
people
I've
done
my
step
work
already.
If
you
leave
it
till
the
evening,
you
spend
all
day
wondering
if
you're
even
going
to
get
it
done.
And
then
one
day
up
when
you
haven't
done
it.
And
then
two
days,
and
then
three
days.
Then
you
can't
call
your
sponsor
and
you
can't
go
to
meetings
because
you
now
hate
everyone
because
you
hate
yourself.
But
you're
now
in
denial
about
hedging
yourself,
so
you
have
to
hate
everyone
else's
diversionary
tactic
to
avoid
facing
the
truth.
So
rather
than
that,
just
get
them
to
do
it.
You
know,
get
get
up
at
6:30,
get
it
done,
and
then
spend
the
rest
of
the
day
smug
if
someone's
not
working.
Like
not
yourself
out.
The
one
thing
I
would
say
there
can
there
is
such
thing
as
too
much
step
work.
Sometimes
it
gets
too
intense
and
you
just
need
to
go
and
do
something
nice
instead.
So
I
tell
people
to
bookend
the
step
work
with
a
little
prayer
to
start
with,
a
little
prayer
at
the
end.
And
maybe
if,
especially
if
it's
really
intense,
some
people's
histories
are
really
intense,
to
book
something
nice
afterwards
to,
you
know,
take
the
sort
of
bitterness
away
and
to
come
back
into
the
room.
Strenuous
effort.
We're
not
interested
in
results
here.
We're
interested
in
effort.
And
that's
important.
This
is
our
first
attempt
to
look
at
this
properly
and
it's
not
going
to
be
perfect.
So
sometimes
people
spend
years
doing
their
first
step
for.
And
I
don't
think,
I
don't
think
that's
the
most
helpful
thing
to
do.
You
want
to
get
it
done
as
my
old
sponsor
Brian
said
about
his
amends,
about
some
of
his
amends,
I
think
it
was
his
amends
or
something.
He
said
I
did
them.
I
wouldn't
give
you
tuppence
for
how
I
did
them,
but
I
did
them.
And
I
think
it's
like
that.
But
the
first
step
for
or
even
the
second
step,
but
maybe
the
first
five
step
fours
are
a
complete
disaster.
But
at
least
you're
getting
the
material
out
as
best
you
can.
Kevin
used
to
say
you
you're
only
interested
in
the
whole
luggage.
You
can
come
back
for
the
hand
luggage
later.
And
I
think
that's,
I
think
that's
right,
a
strenuous
effort
to
face
and
be
rid
of.
So
sometimes
people
talk
about
managing
anxiety
and
depression
and
all
of
these
other
things
and
that
just
makes
me
want
to
jump
off
a
bridge
now.
My
anxiety,
my
depression,
my
this
my
that
did
not
go
straight
away
but
I
want
a
solution
which
is
going
to
get
rid
of
it,
not
just
help
me
somehow
live
in
hell.
That's
not
the
purpose.
The
purpose
is
to
be
rid
of
this
crap.
The
advice
I
give
to
sponsors
as
well
about
Don
Pritz
would
say
that
in
step
four,
what
you
want
to
do,
It's
like
you're
sending
a
kid
to
a
room
to
clean
up
the
room
by
taking
a
big
bin
bag
and
putting
all
the
stuff
they
don't
want
that
is
broken
and
doesn't
work
and
they're
tired
of
them
and
they've
outgrown.
Put
it
in
the
bin
bag
and
then
we'll
take
it
to
the
tip
and
then
we'll
buy
you
some
new
stuff.
And
that's
the
image
here.
Everything
we
find,
we
get
to
get
rid
of.
So
we're
not
finding
who
we
are.
This
is
not
about
us.
It
doesn't
say
we
find
who
we
are.
We
we
find
the
things
in
ourselves
which
have
been
blocking
us.
Now
if
you
get
rid
of
what's
blocking
you,
you
find
who
you
are.
But
the
Step
4
is
not
about
us.
It's
about
the
things
which
don't
work.
What
things?
Beliefs,
thinking,
behaviour.
I
didn't
come
up
with
my
own
beliefs,
thinking
and
behaviour.
They
were
taught
to
me
by
society
and
by
my
family
and
the
people
around
me.
And
so
Step
4
is
about
finding
the
things
that
I
borrowed
from
other
people
which
don't
work,
so
I
can
get
rid
of
them.
And
then
I
will.
I
will.
Who
I
am
is
what's
left
over
when
everything
from
Step
4
is
gotten
rid
of.
So
that's
why
there's
nothing
to
be
frightened
of
here,
because
you're
not
writing
about
yourself.
You're
writing
about
the
beliefs,
the
thinking,
the
behaviour
which
have
messed
you
up,
and
you're
not
responsible
for
installing
the
bad
software
in
yourself
in
the
first
place.
So
yeah,
use
save
to
the
sponsor.
You're,
I'm
sending
you
to
your
room
to
take
all
the
stuff
that
doesn't
work
so
we
can
get
rid
of
it
so
you
don't
have
to
look
at
it.
Yeah,
okay.
It's
totally
different
than
thinking
that
you're
having
to
sort
of
do
a
catalogue
of
the
hell
that
you
live
in
so
that
at
least
you
now
understand
that
the
the
hell
that
you
live
in,
there's
no
point
in
that.
I
don't
know
if
any
of
you
are
old
enough
to
remember.
I'm
not
going
to
name
names.
I
think
I
can
see
a
couple,
but
there
was
a
show
that
I
remember
from
the
1970s
and
early
80s
called
the
Generation
Game,
where
the
prize
round,
a
conveyor
belt
would
come
past
with
all
of
the
prizes
and
you
got
to
concentrate
very
hard
on
the
conveyor
belt.
And
then
afterwards,
after
2
minutes
were
up.
Anything
that
you
could
recall
as
having
been
on
the
conveyor
belt,
you
got
to
keep
and
take
home
as
the
prize.
And
Step
4
is
like
that,
but
in
reverse.
Anything
you
get
to
find,
you
get
to
get
rid
of.
So
you
want
to
find
stuff.
You
don't
want
to
conceal
stuff
because
it's
the
stuff
that's
killing
you.
Our
liquor
but
was
but
a
symptom.
So
we
had
to
get
down
to
causes
and
conditions.
Therefore
we
started
upon
a
personal
inventory.
This
was
step
4A
business
which
takes
no
regular
inventory
usually
goes
broke.
Taking
a
commercial
inventory
is
a
fact
finding
and
a
fact
facing
process.
So
again,
here
we're
interested
in
peeling
back
the
layers
of
self
justifying,
blame
throwing
narratives
and
stories
which
have
coated
these
tiny
little
grains
of
reality
until
we
can
find
out
what
really
happened,
what
really
went
on.
It's
about
finding
the
getting
past
the
story,
peeling
it
back
and
getting
to
the
truth.
Also,
it's
about
facts,
not
judgements.
So
when
I
discover,
I
give
you
an
example.
And
because
people
are
very
frightened
that
although
it's
a
moral
inventory,
it's
not
a
moralistic
inventory.
So
what's
a
moral
inventory?
It's
an
inventory
where,
for
instance,
I
discovered
that
I
am
self
centred.
Now
that's
not
with
a
wagging
the
finger
at
me,
that's
a
moral
question.
Am
I
self
centred
or
am
I
other
centred?
It's
it's
definitely
a
question
within
the
domain
of
morality.
That's
where
it
resides.
So
it's
a
moral
question,
but
we're
not
judging,
we're
saying
what
is
going
on
and
do
we,
what
results
are
we
getting
from
that?
I'll
give
you
an
example.
I
was
often
told
as
a
child,
oh,
you're
so
selfish,
selfish,
selfish,
selfish.
And
I
never
liked
that.
But
when
someone
said
to
me,
well,
let's
look
at
this
notion
that
you
might
be
self-centred
for
one
day.
Every
half
hour,
at
the
end
of
the
half
hour,
you
write
down
what
you've
been
predominantly
thinking
about
for
the
previous
half
hour.
And
come
back
to
me
the
next
day
and
we'll
do
a
little
summary.
What
have
you
been
thinking
about?
And
it
turns
out,
thinking
about
myself
in
some
aspect.
For
each
of
those
half
hours,
I've
been
thinking
about
these
seven
areas
of
self,
which
we're
going
to
come
to
what
I
what
what
I
thought
others
thought
of
me,
pride,
what
I
thought
about
myself,
self
esteem,
how
others
were
treating
me,
personal
and
sex
relations
about
my
financial
position,
pocketbooks
about
my
security,
the
things
that
I
need
and
the
and
ambitions,
the
things
that
I
want.
Me
being
self-centered
was
simply
an
objective
description
of
what
my
thought
life
was
centered
on.
Namely
me
says
not
a
it's
not
a
finger
wagging
thing.
It's
simply
look
at
the
fact.
And
then
you
say
to
yourself,
how
much
fun
am
I
having
thinking
about
me
all
day
long?
How
pleasant
is
that?
But
it's
horrible.
Well,
OK,
I
want
to
get
rid
of
it
then.
So
it's
no
different
than
if
you
got
a
radio
and
it
doesn't
work.
It's
the
it's
not
a
bad
radio,
it's
not
a
naughty
radio,
it's
a
radio
which
doesn't
work.
And
it's
the
same
with
all
of
the
beliefs,
the
thinking
and
the
behaviour.
What's
a
character
defect?
It's
a
belief,
a
thinking
pattern
or
a
behaviour
pattern
which
does
not
work.
It
talks
in
the
big
book
also
about
our
willingness
to
throw
away
the
gadget,
which
doesn't
work
in
favour
of
the
new
one,
which
does.
Let's
have
a
look.
Resentment.
Now,
the
reason
we're
starting
with
resentment,
the
whole
phenomenon
of
resentment
is
one
in
which
it's
basically
a
great
big
narrative
where
I'm
the
innocent
Princess
in
a
world
full
of
ghouls
and
monsters
and
ogres
and
threats
and
perils
and
wicked
stepmothers
and
wicked
witches,
and
I'm
the
one
being
fed
the
poisoned
apples.
So
where
is
where
is
me?
And
it's
basically,
I
won't
go
into
too
many
details
because
I
don't
appear
into
Course
in
Miracles
territory,
but
basically
that's
what
resentment
is
about.
It's
about
establishing
an
existential
position
where
I'm
innocent
and
the
Bony
finger
of
retribution
is
pointed
at
you,
not
at
me,
as
I'm
trying
to
get
rid
of
my
own
guilt
and
fear.
Right.
OK,
so
resentment,
it's
this
huge
diversionary
tactic.
If
I'm
going
to
have
a
hope
in
Hell's
chance
of
getting
to
that
moral
inventory
bit
of
step
four,
I've
got
to
get
rid
of
resentment.
To
get
rid
of
resentment,
I've
got
to
be
willing
to
get
rid
of
resentment.
To
be
willing
to
get
rid
of
resentment,
I
need
to
do
this
analysis
in
the
first
three
columns
to
to
understand
the
insanity
of
it.
Because
it's
only
by
looking
at
the
insanity
of
it
that
I'm
willing
to
let
go
of
it.
In
the
same
way.
It
was
only
when
I
looked
at
the
insanity
of
the
drinking
and
the
other
neat
behaviours,
the
compulsive
addictions,
It
was
only
by
looking
at
the
insanity
of
it
that
I
recognized
that
I
didn't
want
the
insanity
anymore.
So
the
Step
4,
here's
the
boss
level
tip.
Step
4,
the
moral
inventory
does
not
start
until
page
67.
The
first
question
in
which
I
identify
a
moral
failing
of
myself
is
what
were
my
mistakes
on
page
67?
So
what
the
hell
is
this
stuff
about
resentment?
I'm
not
going
to
look
at
me
whilst
I
think
there's
something
wrong
with
you.
Whilst
you're
wrongs
are
filling
my
entire
universe
and
consciousness,
I
cannot
look
at
myself.
So
we've
got
to
get
rid
of
this
stuff.
Another
very
important
point
about
getting
rid
of
resentment.
All
resentment
is
the
same
and
it
boils
down
to
this.
If
this
had
been
different,
I
would
be
OK.
If
this
were
different,
I
would
be
OK.
So
whether
you've
got
Whether
I've
got
one
resentment
or
10,000,
the
underlying
structure
is
the
same.
What
this
means
is
I
don't
need
to
analyze
every
single
resentment
in
my
life.
I
need
a
good
range
to
understand
its
pervasive
impact
and
to
really
ram
home
what
is
going
on.
But
once
the
lesson
has
been
learned,
I
do
not
need
to
write.
I
saw
a
girl
once
in
a
meeting.
I
felt
so
sorry
for
it.
She
had
four
lever
Arch
files
full
of
papers
on
resentments,
and
she'd
been
it
for
two
years.
She'd
fallen
out
with
her
sponsor.
She
was
looking
for
someone
to
read
it
to.
People
were
running
and
hiding
and
it
I
tried
to
talk
to
her,
but
she
was
very,
she
didn't
want
it.
She
didn't
want
to
summarize
it.
No,
no,
no.
She
wanted
to
read
out
every
damn
thing.
We
get
very
attached
these
narratives,
so
it's
very
important.
I
always
explain
this
to
sponsees.
You
must
never
treat
Step
4
as
a
socially
acceptable
form
of
self
absorption.
We're
here
to
get
a
job
done
and
get
it
done
effectively
and
efficiently
so
we
can
move
past
it.
Umm,
so
the
first
three
columns.
First
of
all,
what
is
resentment?
Now
resentment
we
think
of
resentment
and
it's
one
of
those
words
just
like
craving
in
physical
craving
or
obsession
in
mental
obsession,
where
the,
the
meaning
of
it
in
the
big
book
is
different
than
the
meaning
of
it
in
the
language.
Generally.
It's
related,
but
it's
not
exactly
the
same.
So
resentment
in
the
language
generally
means
a
sort
of
an
ongoing
self-righteous
grievance.
But
it's
very
interesting
when
you
look
at
the
language
in
the
big
book,
by
the
way,
footnote
what
is
written
here
was
not
what
the
1st
100
did.
You
need
to
know
that.
But
if
you
do
what
Bill
wrote
down
in
1939,
you'll
discover
it
1000
times
more
effective
than
what
the
1st
100
did.
So
it's
some
weird
miracle
which
shouldn't
work,
but
it
does
anyway.
That's
another
question.
When
it
talks
about
resentment,
it
then
talks
about
we
asked
ourselves
why
we
were
angry.
And
then
it
talks
about
being
hurt
or
threatened,
being
sore,
being
burned
up.
And
then
it
talks
about
our
injuries
and
being
interfered
with
where
where
these
things
have
been
interfered
with.
So
really
this
is
going
to
be
a
catalogue
not
just
of
grumbling
grievances,
but
basically
any
situation
where
I'm
either
persistently
or
recurrently
upset,
where
I'm
out
of
whack.
It
doesn't
matter
what
flavour
the
out
of
whackness
is.
It
can
be
rage,
it
can
be
it
can
be
hurt
or
threatened,
can
be
self
pity,
can
be
basically
anything
which
bothers
me
because
to
do
the
inventory
I've
got
to
be
unbothered.
Sometimes
when
people
have
a
crisis,
when
sponsees
have
a
crisis,
the
first
thing
that
they
want
to
do
is
do
the
inventory.
And
you
can't
because
you're
still
upset.
You
need
to
get
an
upset
to
do
the
inventory
because
you're
crazy.
If
you're
crazy,
you
won't
see
it
straight.
So
you
got
to
get
unopset
first.
So
with
this
I
get
people,
and
I
do
this
myself,
of
course,
I
get
built
to
write
about
anything
which
upsets
them.
It
doesn't
matter
if
it
feels
like
the
word
resentment
is
anything
which
upsets
or
bothers
you
at
any
level.
And
first
of
all,
you
want
people
to
do
a
full
catalogue
of
names
of
people,
places,
situations,
ideas.
So
when
it
says
principles,
treat
that
as
being
abstract
ideas.
So
I've
had
problems
with
literally
the
second
law
of
thermodynamics.
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
detail,
but
that
that
took
up
a
couple
of
years
back
there.
It's,
it's
possible
to
have
resentment
against
super
abstract
things.
It
doesn't
matter
what
it
doesn't
matter
that
the
point
is
to
get
something
down
in
the
first
column.
Now
the
.1
of
the
points
of
that
is
if
you
can
get
a
comprehensive
first
column
of
all
the
things
which
are
basically
persistently
or
are
currently
bothered
you
in
your
life
and
it's,
you're
not
writing
in
detail,
but
you've
got
a
full
list.
The
purpose
of
this
is
twofold.
First
of
all,
it
gives
you
a
starting
point
for
the
to
the
stat
4,
but
secondly,
you
now
know
the
scope
of
everything
that
is
wrong
with
you.
Everything
that
is
wrong
with
you
is
sitting
behind
those
situations.
I
used
to
go
to
psychotherapy
and
it
did.
It
was
wonderful
in
some
ways,
but
every
time
I
went,
it
was
like
cutting
the
head
off
the
hydra
and
two
more
heads
grew
back.
So
it
didn't
matter
what
we
resolved.
We
see
I
seem
to
come
away
from
each
session
with
twice
as
many
problems
as
I
started
with
this.
It's
the
opposite
process
where
if
you
can,
I
mean
I
remember
looking
at
a
piece
of
paper
with
all
the
names
on
and
saying
my
God,
my
whole
life
problem
can
actually
be
summarized
on
one
page.
If
I
can
get
past
these
disturbances,
I'll
be
fine.
Which
I
indeed
was
once
They've
got
the
list
of
names
and
it
could
be
the
most
someone
had
was
670.
If
people
have
fewer
than
20,
I
don't
believe
them.
I
just
don't
believe
people
that
have
fewer
than
20.
So
that's
a
whole
other
discussion.
But
most
people
come
up
between,
you
know,
20506070.
What
I
then
get
people
to
do
is
narrow
down
the
top
20
to
cover
a
whole
range
of
areas
in
their
lives
on
the
basis
that
once
you've
analyzed
20,
you're
not
going
to
learn
anything
new.
It's
everything
is
just
the
same
thing,
wearing
a
different
hat.
And
then
we
get
to
the
second
column
and
look
at
this.
Look
how
concise
it
is.
Mr.
Brown.
I'm
resentful
of
Mr.
Brown.
His
attention
to
my
wife
told
my
wife
of
my
mistress
Brown
may
get
my
job
at
the
office.
You'll
notice
1235
words,
1236
words,
123458
words,
but
no
more
than
that.
So
I
get
people
to
write
up
to
five
charges
per
person
to
try
to
be
as
factual
as
possible
and
not
to
tell
a
great
big
story.
We
want
to
get
the
nub
of
it
in
the
second
column
and
to
do
that
for
somewhere
around
20
people
and
that
can
be
done
in
like
40
minutes.
Some
people
need
some
real
hand
holding
to
go
from
the
abstract
story
in
their
minds
to
the
actual
truth
of
what
is
going
on.
My
favorite
exam?
My
friend
Ivana.
She
doesn't
mind
me
telling
the
story
she
had
a
problem
with.
Let's
let's
say
Carol
and
2nd
column
Carol
is
always
putting
me
down
and
I
started
and
you
want
to
examine
this
for
them.
So
always
what?
You
mean
like
literally
every
time
you
encounter
Carol,
she
puts
you
down.
No,
no,
no,
no,
no.
How
often?
Well,
it
turns
out
once
a
week.
What
do
you
mean
by
putting
you
down?
That's
a
bit
abstract.
That
could
mean
anything.
She
said
she
criticizes
my
ideas.
OK,
that's
great.
That's
now
concrete.
I
can
understand
that
she
criticizes
my
ideas.
Give
me
a
bit
of
background
here.
Who
is
she?
Oh,
she's
my
boss.
She's
20
years
my
senior.
What's
the
context
in
which
this
is
happening?
It's
work
meetings
where
we
get
to
throw
out
ideas
and
then
everyone
comments
on
everyone
else's
ideas.
So
the
truth
in
the
second
column
was.
So
we
changed
the
first
column
from
Carol
to
my
line
manager
and
in
the
second
column
we
got
it
down
to
occasionally
disagrees
with
me
in
work
meetings.
Now
can
you
see
how
Carol
always
puts
me
down
is
totally
different
than
My
line
manager
Occasionally
disagrees
with
me
In
work
meetings,
we've
in
getting
the
facts
down
in
the
second
column,
we're
already
doing
a
huge
amount
of
strip
away
the
the
the
narrative.
Often
the
narrative
sounds
like,
you
know,
when
they're
telling
you
what's
going
to
happen
on
a
soap
opera
this
evening.
That's
what
people's
first
draft
of
the
second
column
sounds
like.
And
I
always
work
very
carefully
on
the
second
column
to
strip
back
the
all
the
fluff,
get
down
to
the
facts.
But
that's
just
such
an
important
tool
for
the
rest
of
your
life
that
when
you
go
off
the
deep
end
to
have
the
ability
to
immediately
start
discounting
the
egos
narratives
and
just
look
at
something
plainly
and
factually.
Now
the
effects
my,
what
it
says
here
is
effects
mine.
Then
it's
got
these
seven
areas
which
we
talked
about
earlier,
Pride,
what
you
think
about
me,
self
esteem,
what
I
think
about
me,
personal
relations,
how
you
treat
me,
sex
relations,
how
you
treat
me
in
the
bedroom
or
in
related
areas,
pocketbooks
is
to
do
with
money,
security,
what
I
need,
ambitions,
what
I
want.
Now,
I
used
to
do
this
the
very
traditional
way
and
just
people
would
write,
I
would
write
this
effects
my
personal
relations,
sex
relations,
self
esteem.
And
I
don't
know
if
you've
ever
heard
of
Step
5
where
that's
all
someone
does
for
the
third
column.
First
of
all,
within
5
minutes
of
its
starting,
you
want
to
start
sticking
pins
in
your
eyes
or
their
eyes
because
it's
so
boring
and
painful.
And
you're
like,
why?
What
are
you
learning
from
this?
I
don't
know.
And
that's
the
problem.
It
doesn't
really
tell
you
anything
unless
here
again,
boss
level
tip
page
67,
it
says
an
interesting
thing.
Where
had
we
been
self
seeking?
Where
had
we
been
self
seeking?
Now
when
I
apply
this
little
trick,
which
as
I
took
this
question,
where,
where,
where
had
I
been
self
seeking
and
I
applied
it
back
to
these
seven
areas
of
self,
all
the
lights
went
off.
And
this
is
the
key
to
getting
out
of
resentment.
Umm.
The
reason
I'm
resentful
is
because
I
am
self
seeking.
In
other
words,
I
have
a
plan,
a
scheme,
a
plot,
a
design,
A
set
of
expectations,
a
blueprint
for
how
I
want
my
life
to
look.
And
you're
messing
with
it.
Your
behaviour
is
not
in
accordance
with
my
blueprint.
Now,
whilst
my
upset
is
your
fault,
I'm
going
to
stay
unhappy
forever.
If
I'm
upset
not
because
of
your
behaviour
but
because
of
my
blueprint.
We
have
a
way
out
here
because
I
can
get
rid
of
the
blueprint
and
then
I'm
going
to
be
OK.
So
to
get
rid
of
resentment,
you
either
eliminate
the
person
as
you
can't
change
them,
so
you
have
to
eliminate
them.
You
know,
wait
till
they're
standing
at
the
top
of
some
stairs,
one
little
push
and
it's
in
God's
good
hands.
You
can
either
eliminate
them
or
you
can
eliminate
self.
You
get
to
pick
eliminating
other
people.
And
I
can
tell
you
it
takes
a
long
time.
There's
a
long
list
of
people
to
get
through
eliminating
self.
You
eliminate
self
and
you
solve
the
problem
universally.
Rumi
Sufi
poet,
would
say
that
it
is
easier
to
wear
slippers
than
to
carpet
the
whole
world.
So
what
we
want
to
do
with
this
third
column
is
use
this
to
demonstrate
case
by
case
by
case
that
the
reason
I'm
resentful
is
because
I
have
a
plan.
Now
how
do
you
get
to
the
plan?
If
you
say
to
someone
how
you
self
seeking
here,
they're
going
to
say
I
don't
know.
They
won't
because
the
ego
is
desperate
to
cover
its
tracks.
So
what
we
got
to
do,
the
way
I
do
it
now,
I've
done
it
differently
in
the
past.
The
way
I
do
it
now
is
I
start
with
personal
relations
and
sex
relations.
Personal
relations
and
sex
relations
are
about
I
got
a
script
for
how
I
want
you
to
behave.
If
it's
in
the
sexual
domain,
it's
sex
relations.
If
it's
everything
else,
it's
personal
relations.
And
I
say,
how
do
how
do
we
want
you
to
behave?
So
let's
take
the
example
of
the
line
manager,
personal
relations.
And
you,
you
go
to
town.
You're
giving
the
ego
a
voice
in
order
to
write
down
what
it
says.
Look
at
it
objectively.
So
the
line
manager,
what's
my
script
for
the
line
manager?
Agree
with
everything
I
say
in
work
meetings.
There
we
go.
That's
the
script.
Now,
the
reason
why
I
want
someone
to
behave
in
a
certain
way
is
because
I
have
a
plan
for
what
my
life
should
look
like.
And
the
plan
breaks
down
into
all
the
financial
stuff,
which
is
pocketbooks
into
all
the
needs
and
need
is
something
that
everyone
needs.
If
it's
just
you,
it's
not
a
need,
it's
a
want.
So
need
is
about
basic
stuff,
which
is
common
to
all
humanity.
That's
security
ambitions
is
about
what
I
want.
So
we
so
I
say,
you
know,
so
the
now
imagine
response,
right?
So
Carol,
your
boss,
if
she
if
she
would
always
agree
with
you
and
work
meetings,
what
would
that
deliver
to
you
in
terms
of
outcomes?
She'd
say,
well,
I'm
going
to
get
to
keep
my
job.
I
put
that
on
security.
I
keep
my
job,
um,
pocketbooks.
Well,
that
affects
my
income.
That
bounces
back
onto
security.
I'll
have
somewhere
to
live,
somewhere
to
to
some
some
funds
to
pay
for
my
daily
necessities
because
if
she
criticises
me,
what
I'm
frightened
of
is
she's
going
to
sack.
And
then
ambitions.
I
want
a
smooth
progression
up
the
career
chain.
So
we've
now
got
a
picture
of
the
blueprint
for
this
person's
life
and
then
that's
the
outset.
So
you've
got
scripts,
personal
and
sex
relations,
you've
got
the
ambition,
security
and
pocketbooks,
which
is
the
outcomes,
and
then
you
got
the
internal
crap.
So
why
am
I
bothered
that
my
line
manager
criticizes
me
and
work
meetings?
Because
I'm
frightened
that
my
colleagues
think
this
is
pride,
think
I'm
incompetent.
Incompetent.
There
we
go.
It's
no
more
complicated
than
that.
Incompetent
and
foolish.
I
want
them
to
think
of
me
as
smart,
innovative,
accomplished.
And
then
self
esteem
might
be
the
same
thing.
So
what
I
get,
what
I
get
people
to
write
and
what
I
write
myself
under
pride,
how
do
I
want
them
to
see
me?
How
do
I
think
they
see
me?
Self
esteem,
How
do
I,
how
would
I
like
to
see
myself?
How
do
I,
how
do
I
actually
see
myself?
And
sometimes
those
feed
into
each
other.
So
if
people
think
I'm
crap,
I
think
I'm
crap.
If
I
think
I'm
crap,
I'll
project
that
out
onto
other
people.
They're
not
always
the
same
though.
Sometimes
you
know
you've
done
an
amazing
job,
you
just
can't
get
the
buggers
to
see
it.
Sometimes
you
think
you're
terrible
even
though
everyone's
saying,
oh
we
love
you
so
much
and
you
have
so
much
to
live
for,
but
you're
like,
no,
I'm
the
most
terrible
person
in
the
world.
You
just
won't
believe
anyone.
So
sometimes
it's
just
self
esteem,
sometimes
it's
just
pride.
Normally
it's
both.
So
what
you
get
from
this,
I
get
people
to
summarise
the
third
column
across
the
whole
of
the
step
four
and
say
right,
you've
now
summarized
on
one
page
your
egos
blueprint
for
your
life.
If
only
this
blueprint
would
be
established
and
maintained
in
reality,
if
we
could
build
the
building
designed
by
this
blueprint,
we'd
be
OK.
And
you
get
them
to
read
it
out
and
then
normally
laughing
by
about
1/3
of
the
way
through
because
number
one,
it's
full
of
contradictions
#2
it's
pie
in
the
sky.
Because
it's
so
improbable.
I
want
everyone
to
love
me
and
adore
me
and
respect
me
and
validate
me
and
praise
me,
give
me
lots
of
money
the
whole
time
with
no
exceptions.
It's
just
unrealistic.
And
thirdly,
what
happens
when
the
plan
comes
off?
Well,
I
just
make
up
another
plan,
which
is
what
happens.
You're
fine
for
like
8
minutes
and
then
the
cold
wind
starts
to
blow
and
you're
back
at
square
one
again.
It's
like
peeing
yourself
in
public.
There
is
a
moment
of
relief,
but
there
is
no
long
term
benefit.
And
what
this
whole
exercise
does,
it
does
two
things.
First
of
all,
it
it
loosens
the
individuals
allegiance
to
their
egos
narrative
about
what
is
going
on
because
it's
so
clearly
insane.
But
you
have
to
get
it.
When
it's
in
my
head
it
seems
completely
rational.
When
it's
out
on
paper
and
then
communicated
to
someone
else,
it
looks
totally
different.
Once
we've
got
that,
we
look
at
the
page
66,
and
page
66
is
all
about
motivations
for
getting
rid
of
resentment.
Let's
whiz
through
these.
It
is
plain
that
a
life
which
includes
deep
resentment
needs
only
to
futility
and
unhappiness.
So
I
get
people
to
identify
where
this
is
the
case.
Have
you
noticed
that
just
because
you're
upset
about
your
financial
situation
does
not
make
money
fly
through
your
letterbox?
It
does
not
achieve
what
it's
meant
to
achieve,
Unhappiness.
It
is
self-evident.
Also
there's
the
displacement
to
the
precise
extent
that
we
permit
these
permit.
Interesting
verb.
Do
we
squander
the
hours?
That
might
have
been
worthwhile.
But
then
the
ultimate
reason
is
if
I
stay
resentful,
I'm
going
to
drink.
If
I
drink,
I'm
going
to
die.
Also,
there's
a
bit
down
here
which
started
to
get
get
to
me
recently.
A
few
years
ago
we
began
to
see
that
the
world
and
its
people
really
dominated
us.
In
that
state,
the
wrongdoing
of
others
fancied
a
real
had
power
to
actually
kill.
And
what
I
get
to
see
when
I'm
taking
someone
else
through
this
as
well
is
I'll
ask
this
direct
question.
Have
you
noticed
that
because
of
this
set
up
with
the
blueprints,
with
the
scripts,
the
outcomes,
the
image
that
you
want
to
hold
of
yourself,
but
what
you're
doing
is
you're
giving
other
people
the
right
to
determine
how
you
feel.
You've
become
their
glove
puppet.
In
fact,
the
people
that
you
respect
the
least
in
the
world
have
the
most
sway
on
how
you
feel.
How
do
you
like
that?
Do
you
want,
do
you
want
to
be
like
that?
Do
you
want
to
be
someone
that
is
constantly
triggered
and
set
off
by
ordinary
everyday
events?
Or
do
you
want
to
be
free?
And
honestly,
that's
the
one
that
gets
most
people.
People
often
don't
care
if
they
drink
or
not,
but
they
don't
like
the
idea
of
other
people
being
in
charge
of
how
they
feel.
And
that's
true
for
me,
honestly,
emotionally,
that's
that's
the
one
that
I
connect
to.
And
now
the
purpose
of
all
of
that,
the
purpose
of
all
of
that,
is
to
start
to
look
at
the
actual
solution.
And
one
of
the
big
things
which
happens
in
recovery
is
people
get
really
good
at
writing,
but
not
very
good
at
changing.
So
the
purpose
of
getting
this
far
is
to
literally
change,
which
means
I've
got
to
cut
off
the
resentment
at
the
ankles
now.
People
step
forwards
vary.
Sometimes
you
have
step
fours
where
the
everyone
on
there
is
clearly
like
borderline
evil.
And
that
happens
particularly
people
are
getting
sober
really
young.
One
of
the
reasons
they
get
sober
really
young
is
because
there
are
a
lot
of
really
bad
people
when
they're
growing
up.
Some
other
people,
it's
pretty
clear
that
like
people
were
just
people
and
they
were
just
in
my
way.
So
this
notion
of,
of
people
who
wronged
us
were
perhaps
spiritually
sick
yet
sometimes
or
maybe
they
were
just
getting
on
with
their
lives
and
they
were
in
my
way
and
so
they
were
a
target.
But
basically
the,
the,
the
simple
insight
I
need
to
convey
at
this
point
with
a
sponsee
is
this.
If
people
behave
badly,
it
is
because
they
are
driven
by
emotions
that
are
more
powerful
than
them.
Exactly
the
same
as
on
page
62
about
ourselves.
So
we
take
the
insight
from
page
62
and
apply
it
here
and
just
deliberately
look
at
these
other
people
and
say
why
might
they
have
behaved
badly?
What
might
be
motivating
them?
Can
I
identify
with
those
motivations
even
though
the
manifestation
is
different?
Can
I
identify
with
them?
And
that
starts
to
break
down
the
barrier
between
me
and
other
people.
And
then
to
diligently
over
a
period
of
a
couple
of
weeks,
apply
this
prayer.
This
is
a
sick
man.
How
can
I
be
helpful
to
him?
God
save
me
from
being
angry.
Thy
will
be
done
every
single
time
the
person
pops
into
your
head.
Again
and
again
and
again.
And
it's
amazing.
It
works
it.
You
can
turn
other
things
here
into
prayers.
God
will
show
us
how
to
take
a
kindly
and
tolerant
view
of
each
and
everyone.
And
so
I
turned
into
a
prayer
and
say,
God
show
me
how
to
take
a
kindly,
intolerant
view
of
each
and
everyone.
And
a
good
way
of
doing
that
the
the
trick
I
give
people
is
ask
God
to
show
you
what
the
world
looks
like
through
their
eyes.
And
it's
not
fun,
that
one,
but
it's
helpful.
And
within
8
seconds
I
read
Oh
my
God,
I'm
a
complete
monster.
Or
I've
been
behaving
like
a
complete
monster.
I'm
a
perfect
child
of
God,
but
I've
been
been
behaving
like
a
monster.
There
we
go
once,
and
I
also
send
people
a
bunch
of
readings
and
things
to
watch
about
resentment
and
forgiveness
and
all
of
that
so
you
can
go
to
town
on
that
forgiveness
stuff.
And
that
forgiveness
journey
then
carries
on
forever
on
its
own
track.
You're
never
done
with
forgiveness.
It's
where,
as
people
say,
we're
in
forgiveness
school
here.
That's
what
the
planner
is.
It's
forgiveness
school
and
the
lessons
don't
stop
coming.
And
then
finally,
finally,
we're
doing
an
inventory
and
I'm
going
to
finish
in
3
minutes.
Alistair,
there
are
eight
questions
here.
I
see
eight
questions.
People
disagree,
people,
people
can't,
you
know,
people
can't
agree
on
how
to
count
things
in
a
A.
Is
it
twofold
or
is
it
threefold?
Well,
I
don't
know.
Let's
count
the
folds.
They
keep
moving
though,
don't
they?
But
I
see
eight
questions
here
putting
out
of
our
minds
the
the
wrongs
others
had
done.
That's
what
the
whole
last
three
pages
are
about.
We
resolutely
look
for
our
own
mistakes
with
mistakes.
I'm
looking
at
where
is
my
where
is
my
perception
of
this
situation
being
wrong?
What
did
I
do
that
I
shouldn't
have
done?
What
did
I
not
do
that
I
should
have
done?
But
the
perception
has
to
be
altered
and
I
get
a
bit
kind
of
Rottweiler
Vulcan
cross
examining
barrister
with
this
stuff
about
the
perceptions.
If
you're
not
that
sort
of
person,
get
them
to
talk
to
a
friend
in
a
a
who
is
a
bit
like
that.
You
want.
I
need
from
the
people
around
me
absolute
brutality
about
deconstructing
my
little
fanciful
narratives
about
things
and
challenging
my
perception
of
things.
If
my
perception
doesn't
change,
I
am
screwed.
You
want
people
to
challenge
you.
So
the
first
question,
what
states
where
is
my
perception
distorted?
What
is
the
true
story
here?
What
is
the
same
way
of
looking
at
this?
Then
these
questions
are
now
super
straightforward.
The
hard
bit
we've
done,
which
is
getting
behind
the
resentment,
this
is
the
easy
bit.
Where
was
I
selfish?
That's
where
I
put
my
interests
ahead
of
yours.
What
are
your
interests
that
I've
disregarded?
Dishonesty.
That
straightforward
lying?
Misrepresentation,
concealment,
or
delusion?
Self
seeking.
We've
already
basically
covered
self
seeking
by
those
extra
questions
about
the
third
column.
What
was
I
frightened
of?
Brainstorm
bullet
points.
Where
were
we
to
blame?
That's
why
I'm
looking
at
the
situation.
What
specific
contribution
did
I
make
to
that
situation?
Which
made
a
bad
situation,
which
either
created
the
bad
situation
or
made
a
bad
situation
worse.
We
saw
our
faults.
The
7th
question
is
faults,
character
defects.
I
give
people
a
list
of
character
defects.
Some
people
like
a
list
of
20.
Other
people
want
the
list
for
like
300.
Like
whatever
suits
the
person's
personality.
Give
them
the
range,
let
them
pick.
But
I
don't
write
more
than
three
faults
per
personal
situation
because
otherwise
you're
just
there
forever.
You
want
to
pick
the
main
items.
And
then
finally
with
Michigan,
our
wrongs,
that's
the
behaviour
of
mine
that
harmed
other
people.
So
the
7th
question,
fault
prepares
me
for
step
7.
The
8th
question,
wrongs,
prepares
me
for
step
8.
Now
what
do
I
write
these
questions
about?
Number
one,
I
write
them
about
the
20
people
that
I
did
the
detailed
analysis
of
in
the
third
column,
plus
any
other
area
of
my
life.
So
often
food
finance,
long
looking
after
your
home.
There
are
lots
of
areas
which
won't
necessarily
come
up
in
the
resentment
inventory.
But
this
is
a
moral
inventory
of
my
whole
life.
And
I
tell
you,
I've
had
people
where
the
resentments
cover
like
110th
of
their
life.
But
the
real
problems
are
over
there.
There's
a
gambling
problem,
there's
a
food
problem,
there's
a
diet
problem,
there's
an
exercise
problem,
there's
a
caffeine
problem,
there's
an
energy
drink
problem.
There's
a
someone
going
to
psychics
and
spending
£400
a
month
with
like
those,
those
like
by
psychics,
phone
lines,
all
sorts
of
weird
stuff
that
will
not
come
out
of
the
woodwork
unless
you
say,
honey,
you
want
to
look
at
your
whole
life,
not
just
the
people
you
resent
because
that's
where
the
inventory
lies.
We'll
cover
fear
and
sex,
both
distasteful
subjects
next
week,
but
I'm
going
to
stop
there
for
now
and
and
ask
Alistair
if
you
would
to
to
open
it
up
for
questions.
Thank
you,
Tim.
Thank
you
very
much.
That
was
very
helpful.
The
meeting
is
now
open
for
questions
for
Tim,
which
can
be
done
by
raised
hand
function
in
Zoom
or
you
can
message
me
through
the
chat
function
and
I
will
ask
him
directly.
If
all
else
fails,
just
wave
at
me
violently
on
the
screen
and
I'll,
I'll
yeah,
hand
it
over
to
you
to
ask
your
question
and
we'll
we'll
try
and
close
on
the
hour
while
we
might
be
a
little
bit
longer.
Anyway.
Anyway,
any
questions?
Amara,
you
have
a
question
and
then
Karen.
OK,
thank.
OK,
thank
you.
Tim,
I
was
wondering
for
the
fear
part
in
the
fourth
column,
do
you
encourage
your,
the
people
you're
working
with
to
go
back
to
the
third
column
and
to
connect
all
the
fears
that
arise
out
of
the
like
demands
from
the
seven
areas
itself?
That's
a,
that's
a
good
question.
I,
I
don't
find
people
have
a
problem
with
that
question
usually.
I
think
it,
it
usually
works
out
in
a
very
straightforward
way.
So
what
I
get
people
to
look
at,
well,
first
of
all,
there
are
two
sources
of
of
the
fear
question.
First
of
all,
it's
those
relationships.
Secondly,
it's
it's
those
that
the
areas
of
life
not
covered
by
resentment
and
I
just
get
people
to,
and
this
is
all
I
do
myself
is
to
imagine
myself
in
that
situation
and
say,
well,
what
what
are
the,
what,
what
fears
are
floating
around
in
my
mind
When
I
consider
that
situation,
I
find
things
just
float
to
the
surface
pretty
naturally.
It's
not
analytical
exercise.
It's,
I
think
it's
a,
it's
a
being
sensitive
to
what
is
going
on
inside
it.
It's
little
fears
which
are
like
crawling
around
under
the
carpet.
It's
lifting
up
the
carpet,
but
you
can
kind
of
see
where
they
are.
So
I
think
it's
you
don't
get
that
by
analysis.
You
get
there
by
sensing
the
bits
that
you're
you
just
simply
by
sensing
the
fear,
which
is
why
you
have
to
be
emotionally
connected
to
do
the
Step
4.
Because
fear,
because
the
emotions
are
the
way
in
why?
Which
is
why
anything,
any
addictive
process
which
is
active
will
put
the
kibosh
on
the
whole
thing
because
it
stops
you
from
being
connected
to
the
emotions
which
are
the
way
into
the
information.
Does
that
answer
your
question,
Amara?
Well,
yeah,
I
was,
I
was
kind
of
thinking
about
how
fear
is
in
parentheses
in
the
third
column,
you
know,
like,
and,
and
do
you
draw
the
person
who
you're
working
with
their
attention
to
that
at
any
point,
you
know,
during
it
or
you
is
it
just
like
whatever
is
not
covered
will
be
covered
in
the
actual
fear
inventory
and
you
don't
make
too
big
of
a
deal.
I,
no,
I
don't,
I
don't
make,
I
don't
make
too
big
a
deal
of
it.
I
honestly,
I
don't
think
I've
ever
had
anyone
struggle
to
come
up
with
the
fears.
I,
I
maybe
people
who
who
sponsor
a
lot
of
of
very
sort
of
mask
straight
men
may
have
different
experiences,
but
I
mean,
I'm,
you
know,
mostly
sponsoring
the,
you
know,
the
ladies
and
the
pansies.
So
we're,
we're
all
about
everything
anyway.
And
they're
sensitive
men,
you
know,
like
the
ones
who
are
going
to
have
trouble
getting
in
touch
with
their
fear
like
I
am
that,
that
boy,
are
they
going
to
avoid
me?
So
I,
I,
I'm
not
the
best
person
to
ask
about
how
to
weedle
fears
out
of
people
because,
you
know,
they're
in
a
different
room
talking
about
something
else.
Maidstone
Karen,
you
wanted
to
say
something.
Thank
you.
And
thank
you,
Alistair,
for,
for
hosting
this
meeting.
Tim,
I
don't
have
a
question
right
now,
but
I
have
a
comment
and
a
great
big
thank
you.
Someone
that
I
am
relatively
close
to
who
is
always
on
my
4th
step
list.
That
should
have
been
the
first
clue
you,
you
brought
something
to
mind
and
made
it
so
huge
for
me
and
and
I
just
have
to
give
you
oodles
of
gratitude
for
that.
It
was
like,
I've
been
seeing
it
like
as
a
small
ad
in
it
paperback
and
it's,
it's
been
blinking.
And
what
you
did
is,
is
you
made
it
this
flashing
billboard
that
really
got
my
attention
and,
and
I
was
able
to
just
absolutely
through
the
way
you
discussed
this
and
took
us
through
it
was
able
to
see
exactly
what's
going
on.
So
clearly
that
I
hadn't
been
able
to
see
him
before
because
I
was
so
involved
in
that
in
the,
in
the
little
print.
So
thank
you
very
much.
I'm
very
grateful
for
that.
Thanks,
Karen.
Angus.
You
had
a
question
then,
Sarah,
after
Angus.
Angus.
Yeah.
Thanks.
Hope
you
can
hear
me.
How
do
you
get
how
do
you
set
up
the
second
part
of
the
the
bit
after
the
resentment
you
talked
about?
So
like,
say
I've
got
a
problem.
I
can't
clean
my
bathroom
or
my
house
is
in
disarray
and
that's
what
I
need
to
do
a
moral
inventory
on.
How
would
you
set
that
up?
A
bit
bit
unclear
what
what
you
put
down
then
you'd
how
you'd
begin
to
analyze
that,
right.
So
with
the
other
areas,
first
of
all,
I
get
people
to
write
a
list
of
areas
of
your
life,
categories
of
relationship
like
sponsees,
colleagues,
family
members,
neighbours,
whatever.
And
then
activities.
And
some
there
may
be
nothing,
there
may
be
tickety
Boo,
but
others,
I
think
there's
eight
questions
are
amazing
because
basically,
if
you
answered
what
are
my
mistakes
entirely
accurately,
that
would
be
your
entire
inventory.
But
that
question
doesn't
always
elicit
everything
it's
intended
to,
which
is
why
you've
got
7
more
questions
to
catch
it.
It's
like
7
Nets
to
catch
the
sort
of
falling
debris.
So
those
eight
questions,
they
all
come
at
the
same
thing
from
different
angles.
And
I,
I
mean,
let's
take
the
area.
If
I
just
take
the
area
of,
of
food,
what
are
my
mistakes?
I,
I
don't
know
about
you,
but
I
know
straight
away,
if
you
ask
me
what
are
my
mistakes
around
food?
I
know
one
of
my
frightened
of,
I
know
I'm
frightened
of
being
fat
and
weird
looking
and
ugly.
And
what
am
I
frightened
of
not
having
enough?
I'm
frightened
of
that,
that,
that
if
I
don't
enjoy
the
food
now,
there
won't
be
any
more
later
or
I'll
spend
the
rest
of
the
evening
unable
to
concentrate
because
I
won't
be
full.
And
I
mean,
I
mean,
I'm
just
not,
I'm
not
quite
right
around
food,
as
you
can
tell.
But
you
scratch
you.
It's
not
deep
below
the
surface,
this
stuff,
but
so,
so
but
those
eight
questions,
I
just,
you
get
people
to
answer
them
as
honestly
as
they
can,
I
think.
But
I
think
there's
an
important
thing,
is
an
important
thing
here.
The
IT
says
somewhere
in
step
four
that
nothing,
nothing
counted
but
honesty
and
thoroughness,
which
means
I
get
to
ask
the
questions
that
are
there,
those
eight
questions
about
each
area
of
my
life.
I
get
to
ask
those
questions.
And
then
honesty
is
admitting
to
myself
when
something
pops
into
my
mind
and
then
writing
it
down.
Sometimes
you
ask
a
question
and
you
don't
get
much
in
the
way
of
an
answer,
but
whatever
you
get
is
enough
to
be
going
on
with
and
you've
got
the
rest
of
your
life
to
sort
out
the
detail.
All
you
need
from
this
step
is
a
basically
a
general
overview
of
what
is
going
wrong
and
enough
things
to
work
on
for
the
next
five
years.
And
I
bet
if
any
of
us
now
got
a
piece
of
paper
and
said
to
our
higher
powers,
what
are
the
10
things
in
my
life
that
needed
to
need
to
change
in
beliefs,
thinking
or
behaviour.
I
bet
within
5
minutes
we
would
have
enough
material
to
work
on
for
the
next
10
years.
So
there's
never
any
fear
about
not
uncovering
enough
material
to
work
on.
That's
not
a
problem
here.
And
you,
I
just
trust
the
questions
because
I
think
the
questions
do
the
business
here.
Thanks,
Tim.
Sarah
Rivka,
Hi.
Thanks,
Tim.
And
yeah,
I
have
OK,
a
comment
and
a
question.
So
my
comment
is
that
we
resolutely
looked
for
our
own
mistakes.
I
have
heard
that
that's
a
rhetorical
question
because
then
that
it's
answered.
My
mistakes
were
that
I
was
selfish,
dishonest,
self
seeking
and
frightened.
OK,
so
that's
a
comment.
And
then
my
question
is
I've,
I've,
I've
experienced
two
different
approaches
in
terms
of
sponsorship
with
the
fear.
One
approach
is
that
the
person
writes
down,
I
have
a
fear
of
spiders.
And
you
say,
okay,
and
you
let
that
go.
And
then
when
they
get
to
the
fear
inventory,
they
figure
that
out.
And
the
other
approach
is
to
ask
why?
Why
are
you
afraid
of
spiders?
Well,
they
might
bite
me
and
then
why?
But
what's
the
problem
with
that?
Well,
then
I
might
die
because
most
things
boil
down
to
a
fear
of
death
or
a
fear
of
being
alone
or,
or
some
abandonment
or
whatever.
Anyway.
So
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
let
people
just
write,
you
know,
the
spider
or
if
you
make
them
like
take
that
to
the
logical
conclusion
that
is.
That's
a
good
point
and
a
good
question
on
on
the
first
point.
If
you
go
to
10
different
big
book
studies
or
10
different
big
book
groups,
each
one
will
do
it
differently
and
think
that
it's
got
the
right
way.
It's
like,
you
know,
all
of
these
weird
churches
in
New
England
in
the
17th
century,
each
one
of
which
thinks
it's
going
to
found
a
new
Jerusalem.
And
and
the
same
thing
seems
to
happen
in
a
a
So
I
think
exactly
how
people
construe
the
book
is
entirely
down
to
them.
I
don't
think
there's
a
right
way
or
a
wrong
way.
There's
the
way
I'm
currently
doing
things
and
that's
it.
But
I
think
the
differences
don't
make
any
difference
in
terms
of
outcome.
I
think
what
makes
the
difference
in
terms
of
outcome
is
sincerity
and
speed.
If
you're
sincere
and
you
do
it
fairly
quickly,
like
my
part
of
it
is
one
percent,
99%
of
it
is
God.
So,
you
know,
if
the
1%
isn't
quite
right,
I
think
God
can
handle
the
rest.
On
the
fear
thing,
yeah,
with
the
we
asked
that
I
don't
get
them
to
analyse
the
fears
in
the
fourth
column
because
we've
got
the
fear
inventory
to
do
that
whole
thing.
But
you've,
you've
hit
the
nail
on
the
head.
We
asked
ourselves
why
we
had
them
and
there
are
there
are
I,
I
don't
sort
of
preempt
too
much,
but
basically
the
two
ways
of
doing
that.
You
brought
it
up.
I'm
going
to
mention
it.
The
two
ways
of
doing
that
is
my
friend
Amon
says
we
asked
ourselves
why
we
had
them.
What
in
my
childhood?
Establish
that
as
a
fearful
thing
in
the
1st
place.
That's
a
very
interesting
question.
Or
if
this
happens,
what
would
happen
next?
If
that
happens,
what
would
happen
next?
So
you
imagine
it
like
a
line
of
dominoes.
Things
that
you're
frightened
of
on
the
surface
are
the
first
domino.
If
that
first
domino
falls,
what
other
dominoes
fall?
And
the
last
domino
to
fall
is
the
core
fear.
But
honestly,
again,
ultimately
with
resentment,
doesn't
matter
how
you
get,
how
you
analyze
it.
At
some
point
you've
got
to
forgive
the
buckets
and
get
on
with
your
day.
And
with
fear,
however
you
analyse
it,
at
some
point
you've
got
to
let
go.
You
can
either
analyze
it
for
20
years
and
then
let
go.
You
can
let
go
now,
but
the
letting
go
is
the
same
either
way.
So
although
I
like
to
do
this
thoroughly
and
carefully,
I'm
always
bearing
in
mind
it's
really.
It's
really
ultimately
because
this
whole
process
opens
a
door
to
God,
who
then
floods
through
your
life
and
clears,
clears
out
all
the
crap
in
ways
that
you
couldn't
have
analyzed
your
way
towards.
I
don't
know
if
that
makes
any
sense
or
helps,
but
there
it
is.
Thanks
Tim.
We
are
running
a
little
bit
over
time
I
hope.
Is
that
OK,
Tim?
Yeah.
Claire,
you
have
a
question.
Yeah.
Thank
you,
Tim.
Actually,
just
a
quick
comment
and
then
a
question.
I,
I
think
I
was
just
thinking
now
I've
never
had
a
sponsee
who
could
accurately
pin
down
what
was
a
fear.
But
just
the
very
process
of
asking
that
question
again
and
again
to
to
show
that
their
resentment
has
to
do
with
fear
has
has
almost
been
enough.
But
just
my
question
is
in
if
in
the
second
column
there
is
five
charges
and
they
seem
to
be
somewhat
unrelated
to
one
another.
When
I'm
going
through
then
with
the
third
column,
and
it's,
it's
asking
those
questions,
what
is
the
demand
and
the
outcomes?
I
sometimes
get
modelled
about
which
charge
these
subsequent
questions
are
addressing.
And
OK,
that's
a
that's
a
good
point.
OK.
So
sometimes,
particularly
when
it's
close
relationships
like
spouses
and
and
so
on
or
or
work
colleagues
or
flatmates,
then
there's
just,
there's
a
whole
part
of
my
friendship
shit
show
in
the
second
column.
If
you've
got
5
unrelated
scenarios,
then
you
want
to
look
at
the
third
column
questions
which
of
the
seven
areas
were
affected
on
how
individually
for
each
one.
You
don't
bundle
them
together
because
it
makes
no
sense
sometimes,
particularly
with
CLO,
with
intimate
relationships,
although
that's
a,
that's
a
sort
of
bad
term,
because
the
so-called
intimate
relationships
are
usually
the
relationships
in
which
there
is
the
least
intimacy.
There's
warfare,
but
there's
no
actual
intimacy.
Anyway,
intimate
relationships,
the
second
column.
Sometimes
the
best
way
to
come
at
it
is
to
look
at
the
relationship
as
a
whole.
And
this
is
actually
true
with
spouses,
with
siblings,
with
parents.
The
it's
not
about
the
surface
situation,
it's
about
this
ideal
for
what
the
relationship
should
look
like
in
general.
So
if
it,
if
you,
if
you're
looking
at
lots
of
different
practical
scenarios,
you,
you
look
at
the
third
column
separately
for
each
one.
If
you're
looking
at
a
kind
of
complex
entangled,
intense
relationship,
what
you
got
in
the
second
column
is
just
4
out
of
5000
examples
of
general
kind
of
crap
personal
interactions.
You
really
want
to
leap
past
that
and
do
the
whole
third
column
just
on
the
relationship.
You
know,
ideally,
how
would
I
like
my
mother
to
behave
if
my
mother
behaved
in
a
certain
way?
How
would
that
affect
my
finances?
How,
what
do
I
think
my
mother
thinks
of
me?
How
would
I
like
my
mother
to
think
of
me?
Just
go
straight
to
the
knob
of
it.
Does
that
make
sense,
Claire?
Thank
you.
Thanks,
Tim.
If
I
may
ask
a
quick
question,
have
you
had
a
situation
with
the
Swansea
where
the
sponse
is
convinced
that
the
resentment
itself
or
the
the,
you
know,
column
one
is
at
a
situation
rather
than
the
you
mentioned
situations
and
the
people
involved
in
that
situation?
The
well,
he
seems
convinced
that
this,
these,
the
resentment
is
at
the
situation
rather
than
the
people.
Yeah,
it
can
happen.
I
don't
worry.
I
don't
get
too
technical
about
that.
I
mean,
I
had
a
kind
of
a
funky
week
last
week
in
various
ways.
And
my,
I
had
eight
resentments
and
as
I
counted
them,
I
had
eight
resentments
and
eat.
None
of
them
were
against
individual
people.
Four
were
against
categories
of
people
in
society.
I'm
not
going
to
name
names,
but
we
all
know
who
they
are.
Four
were
against
categories
of
people
in
society.
The
other
four
were
against
trends
and
practices
in
the
industry
I
work
in.
So
it
can't
really
be
like
the
first
column.
I
can't
really
pin
it
down
if
there
isn't
like
George
or
Susan
or
Clive
who's
doing
this
thing.
It's
what
matters
is
I
think
the
2nd
column
getting
it
clear
what
is
the
what,
what
is
going
on
in
the
actual
material
world,
which
is
bothering
me.
Let's
try
and
reduce
that
to
a
few
words.
Who's
behind
that
in
the
first
column?
Who
knows,
could
be
forces
of
nature,
it
could
be,
could
be
all
sorts
of
things,
but
it's
getting
what
we're
interested
in
is
making
a
distinction
in
the
second
column.
What
are
the
event
situations,
words,
actions
in
the
material
world?
Third
column
is
all
of
my
internal
stuff.
And
to
learn
for
the
first
time
in
your
life
that
there
is
a
distinction
between
these
two
things.
That
they're
not
all
rolled
up
into
one
ball.
That
you
can
take
any
emotional
upset
and
divide
it
into
A,
the
external
trigger
and
B,
my
response.
So
as
long
as
you
can
accurately
describe
the
situation
that
is
happening
out
there,
even
if
it's
like
a
group
of
people
or
and
the
way
an
industry
operates,
that's
sufficient.
It
doesn't
need
to
be
boiled
down
to
a
name.
Thank
you.
I
don't
think
there's
any
more
questions.
I
will
start
closing
up
the
meeting,
actually
the
script,
actually
I
will.
I
will
post
Google
Drive
in
the
chat.
This
is
where
the
meetings
are
recorded
to
and
hopefully
you'll
find
that
helpful.
And
with
that,
I
will
hand
it
back
to
Tim
to
close
the
meeting
in
with
the
Serenity
Prayer.
Thank
you.
Would
you
please
join
me
in
the
Serenity
Prayer,
God
and
the
Wisdom
to
know
the
difference?
Thanks,
Tim.
Thanks,
Alistair.
Thanks,
guys.
Thanks
so
much.
Thanks,
everyone.
Thank
you,
Alistair.
Thank
you,
Tim.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Tim.
Thank
you.
That
Adana
call
to
pass,
is
that
all
right?
Yeah,
yeah,
yeah.
You've
got
another
meeting
starting
now.
We
actually
have
to
close
this
one
down
and
we
get
together
on
the
on
this
meeting
again,
but
you
need
to
stop
recording.
Oh
yeah.