The topic of relapsing sponsees at a Sponsorship through the 12 steps workshop in London, UK
Sounds
good
to
set
the
time
for
the
meeting.
I
will
read
an
extract
from
the
chapter
to
Wives,
page
111.
The
first
principle
of
success
is
that
you
should
never
be
angry.
Even
though
your
husband
becomes
unbearable
and
you
have
to
leave
him
temporarily,
you
should,
if
you
can,
go
without
Wrinkle.
Patience
and
good
temper
are
most
necessary.
Our
next
thought
is
that
you
should
never
tell
him
what
he
must
do
about
his
drinking.
If
he
gets
the
idea
that
you
are
an
egg
or
a
killjoy,
your
chance
of
accomplishing
anything
useful
maybe
zero.
He
will
use
that
as
an
excuse
to
drink
more.
He
will
tell
you
he
is
misunderstood.
This
may
lead
to
lone
evenings
for
you.
He
may
seek
someone
else
to
consult
him,
not
always
another
man.
The
topic
of
tonight's
meeting
is
relapse,
and
Tim
will
share
anything
between
30
and
45
minutes
on
the
topic,
after
which
the
floor
will
be
open
for
questions
rather
than
a
typical
sharing
on
that
hand.
Over
to
Tim.
You're
muted.
There
we
go,
unmuted
now.
So
I'm
Tim,
I'm
an
alcoholic,
just
as
I
know
not
everyone
in
the
room
knows
who
I
am.
Well,
I'm
not
really
anyone.
I'm
just,
I've
just
been
sober
for
28
years
and
I've
been
sponsoring
people
for
27.
That's
my
only
qualification.
Just
because
you've
done
something
for
a
long
time
doesn't
mean
you're
good
at
it.
Just
you
need
to
know.
That
just
means
you've
done
a
lot
of
it.
So
you
maybe
have
more
stories
to
tell,
but
I
don't
know
if
you're
more
effective
what
to
do.
The
sponsee
relapses.
I'm
going
to
tell
a
lot
of
little
sort
of
stories
and
anecdotes
and
ideas,
which
I
I
before
we
even
get
on
to
what
you
even
do
once
they've
relapsed
and
come
back,
if
they
come
back,
is
to
understand
the
nature
of
the
relapse.
If
you
understand
that,
it
just
makes
things
much
easier.
The
first
point
may
be
a
very
obvious
one,
but
by
the
time
they've
relapsed
it's
too
late.
I
remember
I
was
coming
back
from
town
on
a
Friday
evening
many
years
ago
and
I
was
starting
at
the
bus
stop
and
a
little
call
came
through
on
my
mobile
phone
from
my
sponsee
and
she
said
it's
me.
And
I
said
yes.
She
said
I've
had
a
hot
toddy.
And
I
thought,
well
that's
very
nice
for
you.
But
I,
I,
I
don't
know
what
to
do.
I
can't.
I
can't
drag
it
out
of
you.
If
you've
had
one,
you've
had
one.
They'll
have
to
call
me
when
it's
worn
off
and
and
that
started
very
long
relapse
actually.
Then
she
called
me
a
few
years
later
and
said
she'd
finally
got
a
year
sober
and
I
hope
she's
still
sober
now.
But
once
they've
had
the
once,
once
they've
drunk,
it's
too
late.
Now
when
they've
drunk
again,
it's
very
sort
of
tempting.
It
depends
what
sort
you
have.
Sometimes
you
have
a
spawn
see
that
drinks
again
and
they
go
and
live
in
Mozambique
and
then
you
never
hear
of
them
again.
Others
others
call
you
and
want
to
talk
about
the
fact
they've
relapsed
as
they're
having
say,
the
hot
Toddy
or
whatever.
And
this
is
in
very,
very
inviting.
You
think,
well,
I
might
be
able
to
get
through
to
them
or
something.
So
I'm
going
to
tell
someone
else's
story.
I'm
going
to
tell
a
client
one
of
the
famous
Clancy
stories
about
this.
And
I
know
I've
said
this
before,
even
maybe
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
but
it's
such
a
good
story,
who
cares?
So
Newcomer
relapses
and
calls
up
Clancy
and
says
I've
let
you
down,
I've
let
the
group
down,
I've
let
a
A
down
and
most
of
all
I've
let
myself
down.
Clancy,
will
you,
will
you
come
over
and
help
me?
So
it's
11:00
at
night
and
Clancy's
as
well.
Whenever
anyone
anywhere
reaches
out
the
hand
for
help,
I
want
the
hand
of
A,
A
always
to
be
there
for
that.
I'm
responsible
for
it.
So
it
goes
over
and
he
talks
to
him,
this,
this
drunk
with
tears
of
sincerity
rolling
down
his
cheeks
until
4:00
in
the
morning.
And
they
finally
get
it
all
sorted
out.
And
he
drives
home.
He
has
one
hours
sleep.
He
gets
up,
he
has
a
shower.
He's
got
to
go
to
work
in
a
few
minutes.
And
there's
a
call
and
it's
this
newcomer
again.
And
the
newcomer
says
Plan
CI
Thought
you
said
you
were
going
to
come
over.
I've
had
conversations
with
people
when
they're
relapsed
and
then
later
that
day
they
literally
don't
know
they've
had
the
conversation
with
me,
but
they
were
speaking
perfectly
clearly
at
the
time.
There
was.
I'm
such
AI
used
to
be
a
lot
more
of
a
mug
with
with
this
sort
of
stuff
than
I
am
now.
I'm
wiser
to
it
now,
but
I
wish
people
well.
If
they've
drunk,
I
wish
people
well,
but
there's
no
point
in
in
trying
to
carry
a
message.
There's
some
various
workbooks
by
Jim
W
from
San
Antonio,
and
there's
a
passage
which
he
puts
in
all
of
them,
which
is
chilling.
I'm
going
to
read
it
out.
This
workbook
cannot
help
those
who
are
active
in
their
addictions,
and
this
is
the
key
line.
We
don't
know
of
any
program
that
can
help
these
people.
Perhaps
it
is
as
simple
as
this.
When
the
time
comes
to
face
the
healing
process,
these
people
avoid
the
process
via
their
addiction.
Common
sense
tells
us
we
need
to
totally
abstain
while
working
on
this
healing
process.
The
mind
that
made
us
sick
cannot
make
us
well
in
its
present
state,
nor
under
the
influence
of
the
addiction.
We
need
something
higher
than
us,
different
than
us,
other
than
us,
which
can
and
will
do
for
us
what
we
cannot
do
for
this
is
a
mind
training
and
spiritual
awakening
program.
So
it
is
important
to
be
consciously
present.
And
I
think
that
applies
not
just
with
alcohol,
but
with
other
addictions
too.
So
when
I've
tried
to
sponsor
people
in
a,
in
a,
A
and
that
anorexia
is
out
of
control,
nothing
goes
in
nothing
waste
of
time.
You,
you've,
whatever
the
process
is,
has
got
to
be
halted.
Tom
W
tells
a
story.
He
says
alcoholism
is
a
lot
like
dancing
with
a
gorilla.
You're
not
done
dancing
until
the
gorilla
is
done
dancing.
Except
in
the
original
story,
it
wasn't
dancing,
it
was
dating.
Except
in
the
original
story
it
wasn't
dating.
So
if
they're
dancing,
as
it
were,
with
the
gorilla,
you,
you
got
to
wait
till
the
dancers
stopped.
There's
no
point
trying
to
get
in
there
and
get
between
the
alcoholic
and
the
gorilla
because
you'll
get
your
arms
and
your
legs
yanked
off,
and
not
just
by
the
gorilla.
I've
got
to
recognize
my
own
powerlessness
over
that
alcoholism.
Another
of
Tom's
stories
is
about
this
French
Canadian
doctor
in
a
a
called
Doctor
Gill,
who
had
a
thick
French
accent.
I
can't
do
a
French
Canadian
accent,
but
I
can
do
a
French
accent
because
I
form
of
the
French
passport
and
Gil
would
Gil
would
say
algorithm.
She
has
three
phases.
The
first
phase
is
the
fun
phase.
That's
when
you're
having
fun.
The
second
phase
is
fun
plus
problems.
You
have
your
first
divorce,
you
lose
your
third
job,
but
you're
still
having
fun.
So
self
phase
problems
and
the
the
point
of
this
story
is
whilst
they're
still
having
fun,
don't
interfere,
don't
interfere
with
it.
By
the
time
you
get
to
people
who
are
just
in
the
problems
phase,
some
people
are
willing.
So
in
the
big
book
it
talks
about
the
the
well
known
stages
of
a
spree.
So
it's
an,
it's
an
under
discussed
line,
the
well
known
stages
of
Esprit.
Once
I've
gone
out,
you
gotta
wait
till
it
runs
its
course.
That
could
be
a
couple
of
hours.
My
friend
James,
who
some
of
you
know
had
a
bottle
of
wine
after
eight
years
and
he's
been,
oh
I
don't
know,
1718
years
sober
since
then,
just
a
bottle
of
wine.
That
was
all.
It
lasted
one
night.
That
was
it.
Sometimes
it
takes
days,
weeks,
months
or
years
to
run
its
course
and
sometimes
it
doesn't
run
its
course.
It's
it's
got
legs
again.
Some
other
points
about
relapse.
There's
a
story
called
The
Strange
or
Not
the
Strange,
Strange
Case
of
Doctor
Jacqueline,
Mr.
Hyde,
and
it's
about
this
doctor
in
Scotland,
I
think,
who
takes
potions
to
become
this
monstrous
character
called
Mr.
Hyde.
In
the
book
it
says
to
indulge
unstated
vices
without
detection.
So
he
wants
to
do
something
and
get
away
with
it
and
he
takes
this
potion.
He
becomes
this
other
character
so
that
he
himself,
the
doctor,
is
not
implicated
in
what
Mr.
Hyde
get
up,
gets
up
to
say.
He'll
take
the
potion
and
become
Mr.
Hyde.
He'll
indulge
whatever
vice
he
wants
to
indulge
in.
Violence,
mostly,
and
then
he'll
take
another
potion
to
bring
himself
back
to
becoming
Doctor
Jekyll.
Now,
a
couple
of
strange
things
happened
during
the
course
of
the
story.
If,
if
you,
if
you
don't
want
spoilers,
then,
you
know,
go
go
make
a
cup
of
tea
right
now.
Um,
but
during
the
course
of
the
story,
he
starts
turning
into
the
monster
without
having
to
take
the
potion.
Also,
he
needs
higher
and
higher
doses
of
the
counter
potion
to
bring
himself
back.
And
then
eventually
the
counter
potion
to
bring
himself
back
stops
working
and
he
can't
turn
himself
back.
And
that's
the,
the
difficulty
is
people
think
when
they
go
out,
they,
they,
I've
worked
with
a
lot
of
relapses
over
the
years.
They
always
think
they
can
come
back.
I
thought
I
could.
I
first
came
to
a
A
in.
I'd
been
stopping
starting
drinking
for
2
1/2
years
when
I
came
to
a
A
in
January
1993
and
back
of
every
single
relapse.
I
had
a
number
of
relapses
between
them
then
and
July
1993.
Behind
every
single
one
was
the
thought
that
if
things
get
really
bad,
I'll
just
come
back
so
I
can
handle
the
consequences
of
a
slip.
What
harm
could
it
do?
I
mean,
something
really
dangerous
might
happen,
but
it's
really
unlikely.
There
was
basically
the
perception
that
a
slip
is
a
calculated
risk
and
it's
not.
I
mean,
it
is
a
calculated
risk,
but
there's
more
I
might
turn
and
not
be
able
to
get
back.
And
my
friend,
I've
always
say
this
disease,
unfortunately,
sadly,
the
best
example,
my,
my
friend
Paul
and
my
first
two
years
of
recovery,
we
spoke
for
about
an
hour
every
night
on
the
phone
until
around
July
1995
for
a
few
weeks,
he
kind
of
stopped
calling
and
he
drank
again.
And,
and
he's,
he's
not,
I
don't
think
he's
properly
back.
He's
tried
to
come
back
a
few
times.
He's
got
a
few
weeks,
a
few
months,
but
it's
never
taken
again.
So
we
don't
bring
ourselves
back,
we
have
to
wait
till
we're
brought
back
by
the
process
it
needs
to
work
itself
through.
When
I
start
drinking,
I
don't
want
to
stop.
The
person
I
become
when
I
go
back
into
the
drinking
world
has
no
interest
in
sobriety.
That's
why
there's
no
such
thing
as
a
safe
slip.
Also,
even
if
people
can
bring
themselves
back
physically,
that
won't
necessarily
do
it.
There
was
a
when
I
was
in
early
sobriety
in
Russia
in
1993,
I
slipped
and
then
tried
to
go
to
lots
of
meetings,
but
it
wasn't
taking
in
the
same
way.
I
found
it
really
easy
in
the
in
the
January,
February
to
just
not
drink.
Now,
after
a
couple
of
slips,
it
was
incredibly
difficult.
I
couldn't
go
a
couple
of
days.
I
had
to
stay
with
people
to
not
drink
physically.
And
then
as
soon
as
I
was
back
in
my
flash,
I
was
drinking
again.
So
you
can
bring
your
body
back
to
a
it
doesn't
mean
your
mind
will
come
back.
Your
mind
will
come
back
when
it
wants
to
come
back.
So
relapse
is
a
very,
very
serious
thing.
I
think
the
seriousness
of
it
can
be
underrated,
underestimated,
especially
with
the
word
slip,
which
makes
it
sound
like
slipping
on
a
banana
skin
or
something.
Of
course,
the
origin
of
slip
is
Bill
W
describing
someone
as
slipping
from
God's
grace.
Now
there
are
diverging
views
in
a
A
on
what
is
behind
a
slip.
But
as
I
say,
Bill
W
talks
about
people
slipping
from
God's
grace
as
though
it
sort
of
happens
involuntarily
in
I
think
it's
in
Cleveland.
I
may
it's
either
Cleveland
or
Akram.
They
had
a
pamphlet,
this
is
in
the
1930s,
where
it
stated
that
if
you
slip,
you
have
done
so
on
purpose
and
you've
resigned
from
a
A,
there
you
go,
you've
resigned
your
membership.
So
there
were
different
perceptions
at
the
time
as
to
what
was
going
on.
My
personal
view
is
that
the
truth
is,
is
somewhere
in
between,
and
we'll
come
to
that.
When
I
look
back
at
my
own
relapses,
there
were
two
things
going
on
in
every
single
one.
By
the
way,
some
people
say
you
shouldn't
really
call
it
relapse
unless
you've
actually
fully
recovered
fast.
It's
basically
continuing
to
drink.
That's
really
what's
going
on.
I
think
that
may
be
accurate.
But
every
single
time
I
resumed
drinking,
two
things
were
going
on.
First
of
all,
the
thought
of
a
drink
occurred
to
me.
Secondly,
I
acted
on
that
drink,
on
that
thought
of
a
drink,
because
it
was
my
thought.
I
was
still
in
charge.
I
still
saw
myself
as
captain
of
my
own
ship.
Now
I
can't
control
what
thoughts
come
into
my
mind.
So
the
only
solution
if
you
have
a
mind
which
wants
to
drink,
is
to
surrender
your
decision
making
process,
literally
about
what
to
do
with
your
day
to
a
higher
power.
I
can't
retain
any
agency
myself
or
I'm
staffed.
As
soon
as
the
thought
of
a
drink
occurs
to
me,
if
I'm
in
charge,
I'll
drink.
What's
her
name?
Grady
OH
says
that
she
hears
people
saying
today
I
have
a
choice
and
today
I
choose
not
to
drink.
And
she
says,
well
thank
God
I
don't
have
a
choice
because
some
days
I
would
choose
to
drink.
That's
why
I
don't
need,
I
need
not
to
be
in
charge.
That's
why
I
need
my
higher
power
to
be
in
charge,
because
my
higher
power
isn't
first.
Whenever
I
drank
again,
I
was
always
still
in
charge,
which
means
that
I
needed
to
surrender.
And
how
now?
How
do
you
surrender?
It
was
basically
surrendering
to
the
actions
of
the
program
today,
each
day,
so
that
my
day
from
the
moment
my
weary
eyes
creaks
open
in
the
morning
until
they
snapshot
at
night.
The
day
was
not
my
own.
That
was
how
I
treated
it.
I
The
day
was
too
dangerous
to
have
in
my
hands
because
of
what
I
would
do
with
it.
I
was
on
a
very,
very
short
leash.
When
I
got
sober.
I
was
a
very
slippery
customer,
So
what
it
meant
was
taking
the
actions
of
the
program
regardless
of
what
I
thought
or
felt
about
the
actions.
It's
impossible.
You
can't
hand
over
to
God
very
easily
when
you're
very
new.
You
have
my
experience.
You
have
to
hand
over
to
the
actions
of
the
program
because
that's
something
concrete.
That's
something
you
can
you
can
see
people
doing.
You
can
follow
someone
else's
instructions
because
you
can
see
them
physically
in
front
of
you.
Much
easier
to
do
that
than
to
follow
what
you
think
God
is
asking
you
to
do.
Later
on,
there
comes
a
crunch
point
where
it's
between
you.
It's
like
you're
in
a
boxing
ring
and
there's
you
in
one
corner
and
the
desire
to
drink
in
the
other,
and
you
know
that
you're
going
to
get
knocked
out
by
it
and
the
only
thing
standing
between
you
and
the
drink
is
the
higher
power.
There's
other
people
are
just
not
powerful
enough
anymore.
So
they
cut.
They
came
a
crunch
point
for
me
in
1993
where
I
had
to
say
to
this
higher
power,
I
just,
I
cried
out
to
it.
Really
what
the
words
I
said
didn't
matter.
I,
at
some
psychological
level,
I
threw
myself
at
the
mercy
of
this
higher
power
recognizing
I
would
drink
otherwise
and
said
whatever
you
need
to
do,
do
it.
And
I
was
fine
that
night.
I
didn't
drink.
And
that
was
from
a
point
that
I
knew
that
I
would.
So
ultimately
it
it's
it's
between,
although
it's
all
about
the
programme
of
action
behind
that
there's
the
the
the
safety
net
is
throwing
yourself
at
the
mercy
of
God
in
the
moment.
And
a
sponsor
of
mine
who
was
relapsing
once
phoned
my
sponsor,
my
my
sponsor
and
said,
well,
when
I
feel
like
drinking,
what
do
I
do?
Do
I
do
my
step
four?
Do
I
pray,
do
I
meditate?
He
said
it
doesn't
actually
matter
what
you
do
as
long
as
you
do
what
you
believe
to
be
your
higher
powers
will.
And
if
you
have
to
lie
screaming
on
the
floor
until
the
pain
of
not
doing
what
you
want
to
do
passes,
do
that.
Kind
of
doesn't
matter.
The
only
you
have
to
be
able
to
get
through
one
day
not
doing
the
thing
that
you
want
to
do.
And
this
is
in
the
big
book
itself,
in
in
the
The
Alcoholic
anonymous
#3
story
where
they
say
to
him,
you
can
stay
sober
for
24
hours,
can't
you?
And
he
says,
yeah,
anyone
can
stay
sober
for
24
hours.
I
can
as
long
as
I've
thrown
away
the
right
to
choose
whether
or
not
I'm
going
to
drink
and
simply
surrender
myself
to
sobriety
and
commit
to
sobriety.
And
so
I'm
why
I'm
just
going
to
have
to
put
up
with
being
sober
whether
I
like
it
or
not,
just
for
today.
And
that
that
was
when
the
relapsing
stopped.
The
causes
of
relapse.
When
a
sponsee
does
come
back,
I
pretty
much
always
run
through
the.
This
is
a
pretty
standard
list
of
possible
causes.
We
run
through
the
possible
causes
to
try
to
identify
what's
going
wrong,
and
here
they
are.
The
first
one
is
step
0
which
is
the
as
it
were
the
step
before
the
steps.
And
this
was
my
problem
for
a
while.
I
I
wanted
to
stop
drinking
forever,
but
not
just
yet
to
get
sober.
I've
got
to
want
to
get
sober
forever
and
forever
to
start
now.
So
while
I
still
wanted
to
drink,
at
some
level,
nothing
was
going
to
happen.
There
are
step
one
there
there.
There
are
step
one
reservations,
particularly
about
the
physical
craving.
There
are
two
sides
to
a
reservation
about
a
physical
craving.
I
believed
that
I
could
have
what
called
a
controlled
outbreak
in
that
I
could
go
and
blow
away
the
cobwebs
without
too
much
serious,
too
many
serious
things
happening.
And
of
course
you
can't.
That's
the
whole
point
of
the
physical
craving.
You
can't
predict
at
the
beginning
of
the
drinking
bout
whether
you're
going
to
be
whether
nothing
is
going
to
happen
or
whether
you're
going
to
get
run
over
or
arrested
or
whatever.
And
it
was
like
Russian
roulette.
The
other
one
we've
covered
already
is
the
belief
that
I
can
toy
with
my
alcoholism
and
comeback.
There
are
Step
2
reservations,
which
I
suppose
as
well,
step
one,
Step
2
reservations
about
believing
that
I
can
stay
sober
without
a
spiritual
awakening,
That
the
knowledge
of
A
A
and
a
few
of
the
a
A
actions
will
be
sufficient
to
keep
me
sober.
Believing
that
I
can
just
take
a
A
at
my
own
pace.
You
know,
progress,
not
perfection.
Easy
does
it?
It's
amazing
the
slogans
you
can
find
to
support
that
approach
and
sometimes
people
would
say
it's
not
a
race
and
I
think
it
is
absolutely
a
race
now.
It's
not
a
race
against
Janet
and
Susan,
it's
a
race
against
one's
own
alcoholism,
which,
as
they
say,
is
doing
press
UPS
in
the
car
park
outside.
I
think
the
game
is
to
have
a
spiritual
awakening
more
quickly
than
the
alcoholic
ego
grows
back.
I
think
that's
the
deal
and
there's
now
a
lot
of
people.
The
difficulty
is
that
a
A
meetings
and
fellowship
are
very
effective
at
keeping
people
sober
for
a
while
and
it
gives
everyone
the
impression
that
they
can
keep
people
sober
indefinitely.
But
of
course
that's
that's
not
the
case.
If
you
hang
around
a
A
for
a
long
time,
you'll
discover
that's
not
the
case,
that
the
grace
period,
the
grace
period
we
get.
Obviously
there
is
a
grace
period
because
if
there
weren't,
how
would
you
get
to
the
spiritual
awakening
in
step
12
to
keep
you
sober
if
you
didn't
have
grace
to
get
there?
It's
like
you
got
to
get
a
free
pass
to
get
to
step
12.
Now
how
much
are
a
free
pass
you
get
seems
to
vary
from
person
to
person.
It's
impossible
to
tell
until
it's
too
late.
So
you
have
to
treat
yourself
like
you're
on
a
short
leash
because
you
just
don't
know.
You
just
don't
know.
So
there
are
reservations
about
how
fully
do
I
have
to
give
myself
to
the
A,
a
program
to
guarantee
sobriety.
And
then
there
are
some
step
three
conditions
which
I
think
stop
people
from
giving
in
to
the
notion
of
sobriety
fully.
And
you
can
help
tease
these
out
with
people
by
saying
finish
this
sentence.
For
me,
I
believe
sobriety
is
not
worth
it.
If
X
happens,
what's
X?
What
are
the
events
that
you
think,
well,
if
that
happens,
it's
not
worth
staying
sober?
Or
conversely,
I
believe
sobriety
is
not
worth
it
if
X
doesn't
happen.
What
ambitions
or
goals
or
demands
do
you
have
where
if
they're
not
met,
it's
not
worth
staying?
So,
so
the
bad
events
you
want
to
avoid
and
the
good
events
which
you
think
I
have
to
have
that
to
be
happy
because
I,
I
have
this.
I
had
very
specific
demands
about
finance
and
success
in
the
external
world
and
as
soon
as
things
looked
as
though
they
weren't
going
my
way,
I
thought
was
the
point
in
being
sober
and
I'd
be
drunk
again.
I
had
to
get
to
a
position
where
I
was
willing
to
stay
sober
even
if
lots
of
terrible
things
happened
and
even
if
none
of
the
good
things
I
wanted
happened.
So
the
conditions
had
to
go.
So
this
is
what
I
do.
I
review
with
people
when
they
do
come
back
from
a
slip
possible
causes.
Is
it
step
zero?
Is
it
step
one?
Is
it
Step
2?
Is
it
Step
3?
In
almost
every
case,
the
actual
effort
with
the
program
has
been
half
hearted.
Often
it
starts
well
but
then
dwindles
in
the
days
or
weeks
before
the
slip
and
then
boom,
they're
drunk.
Very,
very
occasionally
you
have
someone
that
is
working
terribly
hard
at
the
program
but
slips
anyway
are
it's
exceptionally
rare
in
my
experience.
And
almost
always
there's
a
nasty
little
secret
or
there's
another
addiction
which
is
which
people
are
acting
out
on.
And
my
sponsor
when
I
was
acting
out
said
beware
of
your
own
orthodoxy.
The
reason
you're
being
such
a
good
little
a
a
boy
in
all
these
areas
over
here
is
to
hide
the
fact
you're
doing
XY
and
Z
over
there.
So
sometimes
like
the
Super
diligent
sponsees
who
are
doing
absolutely
everything,
you
know,
tickety
Boo
straight
away,
there's
something
being
hidden
somewhere
because
that's
where
the
energy
is
coming
from
to
be
so
perfect
on
the
surface.
So
but
but
that's
rare.
It's
really
in
almost
every
case
there's
half
measures
going
on.
The
the
only
answer
is
to
offer
someone
the
full
program
to
set
out
the
facts,
which
is
very,
which
are
very
basically
that
only
full
measures
in
my
experience
guarantees
sobriety.
And
what
does
full
measures
mean?
It
means
hammering
the
first
nine
steps
and
hammering
the
last
three
steps.
Now,
sometimes
when
there's
a
lot
of
relapse
history,
there's
a
funny
phenomenon.
This
is
going
to
sound
like
a
mat,
like
I'm
being
completely
mad,
but
I
think
this
is
a
genuine
thing,
doing
the
steps
to
avoid
doing
the
steps.
And
this
is
where
people
will
engage
in
the
process
of
the
first
nine
steps
again
and
again
and
again
in
order
to
avoid
actually
changing
anything.
So
there's
lots
of
time
spent
reading
and
writing
and
talking
and
analyzing
and
sharing
all
the
defects
and
doing
page
after
page
of
inventory.
But
the
person
won't
get
up
in
the
morning,
they
won't
make
their
bed,
they
won't
stop
stealing,
they
won't
stop
lying,
they
won't
show
up
at
work.
Do
you
know
what
I
mean?
And
I've
been
guilty
of
this
without
drinking,
of
doing
lots
of
formal
step
work,
but
without
any
real
effort
to
change
the
things
that
need
to
change.
So
sometimes
you
have
to
come
at
this.
If
that's
the
history
when
people
know
the
big
book
backwards,
you
have
to
come
at
it
differently.
Look
at
the
daily
program
first
and
get
steps
1011
and
12
in
place.
These
are
people.
These
are
people
who've
been
through
the
steps
before
but
have
relapsed
and
have
got
a
good
understanding
of
the
program
in
principle.
The
problem
is
often
not
that
they
don't
have
a
handle
on
the
character
defects.
The
problem
is
that
there
is
ongoing
current
harm
to
people
in
their
lives,
and
that's
why
the
focus
can
sometimes
be
best
on
steps
10:11
and
12:00.
But
ultimately,
it
kind
of
my
experience
it
the
thing
which
guarantees
sobriety
is
willingness
and
sincerity.
The
exact
is
not
about
the
exact
mechanics
of
what
you
give
them
to
do
something
my
sponsor
said
once,
it
doesn't
matter
what
you
give
them
to
do
as
long
as
you
give
them
something
to
do
and
they
do
it.
That
if
you
know,
sometimes
people
say,
well,
if
my
sponsor
had
asked
me
to,
you
know,
stand
on
my
head
on
Oxford
Street,
I
would
have
done
it.
Of
course,
no
sponsors
ever
asked
anyone
to
do
that.
But
I
have
a
feeling
if
someone
thought
that
that
was
what
would
keep
them
sober,
it
would.
It's
the
act
of
surrender
to
action
which
seems
to
make
the
difference.
My
first
run
through
the
steps
was,
between
you
and
me,
Embarrassing.
I
wouldn't
give
you
tuppence
for
how
I
worked
the
steps
in
the
first
year.
Technically
it
was
a
complete
disaster.
But
I
did
it
sincerely
and
I
stayed
sober.
And
the
main
boxes
were
ticked.
The
secrets
were
conveyed.
I
made
some
some
terrible
amends,
but
I
made
them.
They
were
accepted
and
you
know,
I
started
to
take
action.
This
is
the
key
thing.
I
started
to
take
actions
to
get
my
life
in
order
under
the
direction
of
the
sensible
people
around
me.
A
couple
of
patterns
to
watch
out
for.
Um,
there's
11
pattern
which
you
could
call
good
dog,
bad
dog.
So
when
the
sponsee
comes
back,
lots
of
remorse
from
the
drinking,
hugely
sincere
immediately
after
the
slip.
Initially
very
high
levels
of
compliance,
like
almost
going
above
and
beyond,
but
then
it
dwindles
and
then
they
disappear
and
then
they
relapse
and
then
they
rinse
and
repeat.
And
this
goes
round
and
round
around
what's
usually
going
on
here
when
you
talk
to
when
I've
talked
to
people
who've
got
this
cycle,
because
this
was
my
cycle
actually.
Good
dog,
bad
dog.
There
was
one
chap
I
used
to
talk
to
a
lot
and
try
and
help.
I
don't
know
how
much
it
helped
but
kept
me
sober.
Well,
I'd
say
what
happened
before
the
slip
in
the
few
days.
So
my
head
told
me
this,
My
head
was
telling
me
that
my
head,
my
head,
my
head,
my
head.
And
it
struck
me
as
really
interesting
this
because
I
thought,
well,
this
is
the
root
of
the
problem.
Because
when
I
look
back
at
my
own
relationship
with
my
head
or
my,
you
know,
toxic
thoughts,
have
you
heard
people
in
meetings
laughing
about
or
am
I
on
the
way
to
the
meeting?
My
head
was
telling
me
looks,
Ryan
said.
Ever
laughs
about,
you
know,
what
their
head
was
telling
them?
Now
ask
the
right
attitude
because
you're
treating
your
head,
which
is
the
alcoholism
or
the
disease,
as
unlike
crazy
goblin
in
the
corner,
some
kind
of
vampire
gerbil
in
its
little
wheel,
going
round
and
round
and
round
with
its
fangs
but
having
no
power,
having
no,
there's
no
substance.
It's
just,
it's
just
rubbish,
just
rubbish.
Whereas
this
chat
is
mesmerized
by
my
head
was
telling
me
this,
my
head
was
telling
me
that.
And
I
thought
I
said
to
him,
do
you
think
your
head
is
your
higher
power?
And
he
said,
yes,
there
you
go.
So
when
his
head
would
tell
him
to
go
to
a
A,
he'd
go
to
a
A,
and
when
his
head
would
tell
him
to
drink,
he'd
drink.
So
the
reason
this
is
important
is
because
with
this
kind
of
path,
which
I've
called
good
dog,
bad
dog,
it
looks
like
someone
is
doing
what
you're
asking
them,
but
they're
not.
They're
doing
what
they
have
judged.
You've
suggested
something,
they've
judged
it
to
be
the
right
thing.
So
they're
doing
it
because
they
judge
it
to
be
the
right
thing,
not
because
you've
suggested
it.
Whereas
the
ideal
thing
with
a
sponsor
I
found
is
is
to
do
what
my
sponsor
suggests.
Not
because
I
think
it's
a
good
idea,
but
because
he
suggested
it
and
I
trust
him.
And
Clancy's
description
and
sponsorship
is
one
of
his
descriptions
is
to
take
actions
you
don't
believe
in
because
the
person
who's
suggesting
them
is
doing
better
than
you.
The
the
other
path,
and
I'm
going
to
finish
fairly
shortly,
I
think
is,
is
what
we
might
call
pseudo
surrender.
And
this
is
where
people
are
very
good
at
some
things,
but
not
good
at
not
good
at
others.
I've
talked
about
this
a
little
bit
already,
overcompensating
in
some
areas.
So
my
friend
Sarah,
who
is
now
a
clinical
psychologist
at
one
of
the
big
teaching
hospitals
in
London.
But
she
was,
she
got
sober
same
age
as
me,
same
year.
She
used
to
wake
up
covered
in
cold
pasta.
That
was
one
of
her
drinking
stories
naked,
covered
in
cold
pasta.
What
a
sight
that
must
have
been.
Anyways,
clinical
psychologist
now,
but
she
was
good
at
talking
and
analysing.
This
is
her
own
storage,
doesn't
mind
me
telling.
She's
good
at
talking
and
analysing,
but
she
wasn't
very
good
at
leaving
the
house
and
she
found
Janet.
Janet
was
Sarah's
sponsor
and
she
phoned
Janet
one
day.
Janet,
I'm
too
frightened
to
leave
the
house.
Then
she
reeled
off
all
the
diagnosis
for
why
she
was
too
frightened
to
leave
the
house.
Like
sort
of
Scouts
badges.
It's
not
that
they're
not
real.
I
mean,
you
know,
anxiety
is
anxiety.
But
the
question
is
how,
how,
how
are
we
going
to
treat
it?
And
what
Janet
suggested.
Now
I'm
not
condoning
this,
I'm
just
reporting
what
happened.
Janet
said
I'll
only
talk
to
you
if
you
call
me
from
the
phone
box
at
the
end
of
the
road
and
I'll
know
as
it'll
be
a
different
number
than
the
number
you're
currently
calling
on.
And
I
can
see
the
number
you're
currently
calling
on.
She
put
the
phone
down.
Sarah
called
her
back
from
the
home
number
and
Janet
said
that's
your
home
number.
Click.
So
Sarah
got
up
the
courage,
took
a
while,
got
up
the
courage,
and
called
from
the
phone
box
at
the
end
of
the
road,
panting,
panicking.
But
she
did
it.
She
did
the
one
thing
she
didn't
want
to
do.
She
trusted
Janet,
and
she
wanted
to
talk
to
Janet.
And
Janet
said,
how
was
it?
And
Sarah
said
it
wasn't
as
bad
as
I
thought
it
was
going
to
be.
And
Janet
said,
you've
learned
a
very
valuable
lesson
about
fear
there,
haven't
you?
The
story
in
the
big
Book
about
precisely
that,
about
walking
around
the
block.
So
the
point
of
that
story
is
sometimes
the
sticking
point
is
the
action
that
the
person
absolutely
doesn't
want
to
take.
And
once
that
action
starts
being
taken,
the
whole
thing
starts
to
roll
and
progress
starts
being
made.
So
with
this
sort
of
pseudo
surrender
where
like
people
are
super
surrendered
in
areas
AB
and
C,
but
not
in
areas
DE
and
F
to
bear
down
hard
on
areas
DENF
because
that's
where
the
problem
is.
The
good,
the
like
the
compliance
on
the
other
side
is,
is
the
distraction.
That
was
what
was
done
with
me.
I
got
lots
of
stories
myself
about
the
the
sponsor
zoning
and
on
the
last
thing
I
want
to
do,
making
it
my
number
one
priority.
And
that's
been
incredibly
important
for
my
recovery.
And
that
the
ability,
the
reason
this
is
related
to
relapse
is
the
ability
to
do
the
last
thing
that
you
want
to
do
because
someone
else
has
asked
you
to
do
it.
Someone
you
trust
has
said
this
is
going
to
be
in
your
best
interests.
That's
ultimately
the
thing
that
muscle
is,
the
muscle
that
you
need
to
exercise
to
be
able
to
not
do
what
alcoholic
head
is
telling
you
to
do.
And
that's
why
it's
so
important
to
Start
learning
how
to
act
against
one's
own
impulses.
So
there
we
go.
That's
all.
That's
all
I've
got
on
that.
I'm
going
to
hand
it
back
to
you,
Dan,
masquerading
as
Alistair
this
evening
to
see
if
we
can
field
some
questions.
OK,
Thanks,
Tim.
The
meeting
is
now
open
for
questions
for
Tim,
which
can
be
done
by
the
raised
hand
function.
Or
just
give
me
a
wave
and
come
in
and
ask
him.
Sam,
I
mean.
Has
done
nobody.
Thanks
Tim,
that
was
really
helpful.
Does
any
of
what
you
said
change
when
you
apply
it
to
different
addictions
like
sex
and
love?
Muted.
There
we
go.
OK,
so
for
the
backup
recording,
I'm
repeating
the
question
for
the
sake
of
the
recording.
So
does
everything
apply
also
to
the
other
addictions?
Let
me
see.
There's
a
note
I
need
to
read.
I
don't
know
where
he's
put
it
now.
OK,
so
my
relevant
experience
is
is
particularly
with
the
the
the
the
slot
topics.
I
know
a
lot
less
about
food,
but
I've
worked.
I've
got
slight
issues
myself
and
I've
worked
with
a
lot
of
people
over
the
years
and
and
there
are
different,
there
are
differing
views
on
this.
So
be
aware
that
there
are
different
there
there,
there
are
differing
approaches.
I've
seen
people
with
the
S
stuff,
with
the
SLA
stuff
try
really,
really
hard
and
the
abstinence
not
achieved
100%
straight
away.
And
lots
of
my
fried
and
a
lot
of
people
in
the
food
fellowships
who
say
a
similar
thing
that
with
some
people
they
take
they
start
taking
all
the
action
promptly
and
the
food
stuff
clears
up
straight
away.
Other
people,
it's
patient
progress
over
weeks
or
months
before
abstinence,
full
abstinence
is
fully
maintained.
The
latter
is
the
case
for
me
with
the
with
the
slaw
issues
that
it
was,
it
was
patient
progress.
Even
with
like
full
throttle
action,
I
found
myself
slipperier
than
other
people.
But
I
know,
I
know
there
are
other
answers
without
people
in
this
right.
I
know
there
are
other
people
in
this
room
who've
got
more
extensive
experience
on
the
on
the
S
stuff
than
than
me.
But
I
think
the
same
general
principles
are
certainly
for
me,
the
same
general
principles
apply
when
it
comes
to
the
reasons
for
relapses.
It's
it's
all
the
same
reservations
behind
it.
Angus,
Hi.
Thanks.
Thanks
Tim.
I'm
working
with
someone
who
is
slipping
a
lot
and
I
can't.
I
can't.
I
guess
you've
kind
of
talked
about
it,
but
I
guess
how
would
you
approach
a
situation
with
when
I
say
where
I
say,
you
know,
at
some
point
you
need
to
be
willing
not
to
slip
or
willing
to
stay
sober.
I
mean,
I
can't
and
I
can't
give
you
that,
he
says.
Bron
Paulus,
it's
unpaolous.
You
know,
what
can
I
do?
I'm
a
little
bit
stumped.
I
guess
it's
kind
of
understanding
what
are
the
kind
of
the
drivers
in
terms
of
the
step
0123,
but
how
would
you
approach
kind
of
conversation
like
that?
OK.
So
that's
that's
a
very
good
question.
So
this
question
of
powerlessness
over
the
relapse,
the
the
line,
which
I
think
is
very
helpful,
is
that
we're
powerless
but
not
helpless.
And
so
there
isn't
a
contradiction
there.
What
powerlessness
means
is
that
left
to
my
own
devices,
I
have
no
choice
but
to
drink
or
engage
in
whatever
the
behavior
is.
The
whole
point
of
AA
is
that
your
powerlessness
remains,
as
it
were,
sort
of
permanent
state.
But
with
the
help
that's
provided,
it's
sort
of
placed
in
this
structure
of
assistance
of
the
program,
the
principles,
the
power
behind
it,
IE
the
higher
power
and
then
the
people,
the
four
PS.
And
with
the
combination
of
the
entire
fellowship,
the
program,
the
principles,
and
God,
anything
should
be
possible.
So
there's
a
there's
a
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
danger
of
hiding
behind
the
powerlessness
of
Step
1.
The
examination
of
powerlessness
takes
place
in
a
context
where
there
is
no
help
available.
That's
what
demonstrates
the
powerlessness
with
my
own.
There
are
a
couple
of
other
points
I
want
to
make
about
slippiness
with
the
slaughter
stuff
as
it
is
the
one
of
the
reasons
it's
slightly
different
in
my
view.
This
is
just
a
this
is
very
much
a
personal
view.
I
may
change
my
mind
even
later
tonight,
but
the
effect
of
the
chemical
and
electrical
effect
in
the
brain
of
a
fantasy
which
flips
through
your
mind
or
if
you're
walking
along
the
street
and
you're
as
you
were
triggered
by
someone
looking
at
you
in
a
particular
way.
The
chemical
rush
is
is
it's
almost
as
though
you're
creating
a
slip
itself
inside
your
with
your
own
brain
chemistry.
Now
with
alcohol
and
and
cocaine
is
a
good
example
actually
that
they
Nora
Volkov.
You
can
look
her
up
later
with
Avi
Think
Nora
Volkov,
Mexican
neuroscientist.
She
talks
about
an
experiment
where
they
showed
cocaine
addicts
footage,
film
footage
of
people
taking
cocaine
in
a
kind
of
cocaine
taking
environment.
And
they
measure
the
brain
waves,
what's
going
on
in
the
brain.
And
then
they
did
the
same
with
cocaine
addicts
taking
cocaine,
and
they
discovered
almost
no
difference
in
the
brain
function
between
the
two.
So
that
watching
the
film
of
people
taking
cocaine
was
causing
the
same
changes
in
brain
chemistry
that
taking
cocaine
was
doing.
Which
is
a
little
bit
like
the
Doctor
Jekyll
and
Mr.
Hyde
being
able
to
turn
into
Mr.
Hyde
without
taking
the
potion.
Now
with
alcohol,
I
think
a
lot
of
the
slips
that
I
had
started
off
with
the
fantasy
about
it
and
it's
it's,
it
starts
in
the
brain
and
you're
kind
of
setting
yourself
off.
My
experience
with
this
last
off
is
it
was
far
more
instantaneous
than
it
was
with
alcohol.
You
kind
of
had
to
work
at
it
with
alcohol,
but
with
the
last
off,
boy
is
it
quick.
But
but
here's
the
thing.
I
think
I
always
set
myself
up
by
never
having
fully
accepted
the
value.
Valuelessness
of
the
acting
out
there
was
still
part
of
me
which
still
believed
there
was
some
value
in
the
acting
out
that
I
was
missing
out
on
something.
And
that's
the
thing
that
I
was
able
to
actively
work
on
is
to
get
rid
of
the
notion
that
I
was
by
abstaining
from
XY
and
Z.
Everyone's
at
a
list
is
different
in
in
Slough
abstaining
from
XY
and
Z
that
getting
rid
of
the
idea
that
I
was
actually
missing
out
on
something.
And
this
applies
as
much
to
the
the
intrigue,
the
flirting
that
the
the
the
sort
of
toxic
romantic
relationships
as
it
does
to
to
sex.
It
was,
and
it
was
in
fact
the
latter
which
was
more
more
my
my
downfall.
But
I
had
to
really
see
that
there
was
nothing
that
there
was.
There
was
no
good
at
the
bottom
of
the
the
genies
flask,
there
was
nothing
there.
Whilst
I
still
believe
there
was
some
good
in
there.
I
was
opening
myself
up
to
those
fantasies
and
then
I
was
opening
myself
up
to
relapse.
So
now
The
thing
is,
one's
got
to
be
sort
of
gentle
with
people.
I
think
particularly
with
the
slower
stuff,
I've
seen
people
actually
in
much
more
baffled
desperation
with
the
slaughter
stuff
that
I
have,
even
with
alcohol,
because
people
can't
work
out,
they
can't
find
the
reservation.
And
so
I
try
and
be
as
a
sort
of
slow
and
gentle
with
people
as
possible
about
helping
them
find
what
the
reservation
is
with
the
Alcoholics.
The
reservation
is
it's
not
buried
deep,
it's
just
pretty
light
drinking
and
that's
it.
Or
there's
some
some
event
they
can't
some
event
from
the
past
that
they
that
they
can't
bear
to
face.
So
I
don't.
Angus,
does
that
answer
your
question
at
all?
Yeah.
Thanks
a
lot.
OK,
All
right,
come
in.
OK,
Thanks.
I,
I
have
a
question
with
the
good
dog,
bad
dog
behaviour,
but
not
in
terms
of
the
substance,
but
actually
in
terms
of
working
like,
like
doing
the
step
work
and
what
your
experience
is
like
when
people
like
sort
of
have
that,
like
they're
doing
everything
you
say,
but
then
you
don't
hear
from
them
or
they
like.
So
it's
like
the
cycle
of,
but
not,
not
with
actually
relapsing,
but
just
with
not
being
engaged.
And
I'm
wondering
if
the
questions
that
you
pose
like
it's
not
worth
staying
sober
if
X
doesn't
happen
or
it's
not
worth
staying
sober
if
X
does
happen.
It's
sort
of
like
it's
not
worth
being
like
what
by
by
doing
full
measures
of
X
doesn't
happen?
Or
it's
like
not
worth
doing
full
measures
if
if
X
does
happen,
right?
Like,
can
you
use
the
same
criteria?
Does
that?
Is
that
a
question?
Is
that
a
clear
question?
Question.
I,
I
think
so.
So
I
think
there's
actually
a
slightly
broader
question,
which
is
how
you
deal
with
that,
how
you
deal
with
that
cycle.
What
one
thing
that
I
do
with
people
who
have
a
history
of
being
terribly
good
for
a
while
and
then
gradually
going
off
the
boil
and
then
disappearing
is
insisting
on
daily
contact
before
9:00
AM
in
the
morning.
That
works
pretty
well.
And
what
happens
is
you'll
hear,
if
you
need
to
listen
very,
very
carefully,
you'll
hear
stuff
in
their
voice.
You'll
hear
a
change
in
the
voice,
a
change
in
the
tone,
and
you'll
say,
hey,
what's
that
about?
You
seem
pretty
keen
to
get
off
the
phone
today.
What
are
you
frightened
of
today?
What's
bothering
you?
And
very
often
they'll
reveal
something
which
they
wouldn't
otherwise
have
revealed
and
then
next
day
they're
fine
again.
So
I
think
it's
if
you,
if
you
stay
close
to
them,
you
can
often
spot
something
before
they
know
it's
going
on.
No,
it's
not.
It's
not
foolproof.
And
ultimately
you
have
to
remember
it's
down
to
the
individual.
You
know,
Maureen's
great
sort
of
rule
of
rule
of
thumb
that
if,
if
you,
if
they
don't
want
it,
you
can't
say
anything,
right?
And
if
they
do
want
it,
you
can't
say
anything
wrong.
So,
but,
but
on
the
margins,
I
think,
wow,
obviously
how
we
do
sponsor
people
does
matter.
We
wouldn't
be
sitting
here
today.
We,
I
think
we
have
a
duty
to
do
our
absolute
best,
but
it's,
it's
ultimately
down
to
them
what's
often
going
on.
This
isn't
it
with
the
kind
of
good
dog
bad
dog
thing.
Is
there
higher
self
knows
that
they
ought
to
stay
sober,
but
their
lower
self
doesn't
yet
want
to.
And
there's
a
fight
between
the
two.
And
at
one
point
in
the
cycle,
it's
like,
you
know,
those
weather,
the
weather
device
where,
when
it's
that
there's
old
barometers
where
when
the
weather
was
fine
and
the,
the
mercury
was
high,
the,
the
sunny
person
would
come
out.
And
then
it
would,
when
the,
the
pressure
dropped,
the
mercury
would
drop
and
it
would
twist
around
and
then
the,
the
rainy
person
would
come
out.
And
that's
what
you've
got
is
you
got
the
two
sides
and
the
two
have
to
be
integrated
somehow.
And
one
way
of
doing
it
to
integrate
those
two
sides
is
to
say,
right,
those
those
are
two
voices.
There's
a
voice
for
your
higher
self
which
wants
you
to
get
well,
which
wants
you
to
have
a
life,
which
wants
you
to
succeed
in
the
world.
There's
another
part
which
is
just
just
wants
to
get
loaded
and
just
wants
to
do
XY
and
Z.
That's
not
spell
it
out
now.
You
aren't
either
of
those
things.
You're
the,
you're
the,
you're
the
person
that
gets
to
pick
between
those
two
things.
And
so
your
job
is
to
pick
which
one
of
those
you
want
to
run
with.
Whichever
one
you
pick,
you're
giving
your
full
force
to.
Have
you
ever
noticed
with
Swansea's,
sometimes
you're
talking
to
a
sponsee
and
it's
like
they've
taken
the
side
of
the
disease,
they've
taken
the
side
of
the
alcoholism,
they've
taken
the
side
of
the
ego,
and
you're
now
in
a
boxing
match
and
they're
fighting
the
corner
of
their
ego
or
their
disease
or
their
alcoholism.
And
you
realize
you're
not
talking
to
them
anymore.
You're
talking
to
the
ego,
the
disease
or
the
alcoholism.
And
they're
throwing
the
full
force
of
everything
they
know
about
the
program
to
fight
against
the
program.
And
there's
a
the
way
round
that
you
see,
the
problem
is
when
people
flip
back
and
forth
thinking
that
those
two
voices,
that
either
of
them
are
who
they
are
and
they're
not.
Those
two
voices
are
simply
ways
of
looking
at
the
world,
the
right
mind
and
the
wrong
mind,
but
they're
not
either.
And
the
the
trick
you
can
say
to
someone
in
that
moment,
hey,
have
you
noticed
that
you've
just
taken
the
side
of
your
ego?
Now
I
want
to
ask
you,
do
you
really
want
to
do
that?
How
about
you
side
with
me
against
your
ego?
And
let's
see
if
we
can't
make.
Do
you
think
it
might
be
more
in
your
interests
to
side
with
me
against
your
ego
than
to
side
with
your
ego
against
the
whole
of
a
a
which
do
you
think
would
be
more
in
your
interests?
And
it
gets
people
to
separate
themselves
from
the
voice
and
work
out
which
voice
they
really
want
to
listen
to.
And
then
I've
actually,
I've
heard
my
sponsor
on
the
phone
to
someone.
I'll
finish
in
second
because
it's
almost
eight.
I've
heard
my
sponsor
on
the
phone
to
someone
saying
this
is
in
the
car
with
him
in
Texas.
I
get
sort
of
get
trained
on
how
to
sponsor.
There's
all
these
call,
the
calls
are
constantly
coming
in
and
he
lets
them
know
that
I'm
there
and
they
don't
mind.
And
I,
I've
heard
insane
to
people.
And
now
we've
heard
enough
from
your
ego.
I'm
addressing
Andrew's
ego
right
now.
Andrew's
ego.
I'd
like
you
to
step
aside
and
let
me
speak
to
Andrew
for
a
moment.
Now,
Andrew,
what
do
you
think
about
this?
He
literally
separates
out
the
ego
within
the
person
from
the
person
and
asks
to
speak
to
the
person.
And
it's
pure
AA.
This.
It's
when
people
say
in
A8,
the
disease
is
telling
me
to
drink,
but
I
know
my
higher
power
wants
me
in
here.
It's
where
you
identify
as
something
beyond
the
ego,
beyond
the
disease,
beyond
the
addiction
that
gets
to
choose
which
voice
is
it
in
my
best
interests
to
listen
to.
And
that's
how
you
can
get
people
out
of
that
good
dog,
bad
dog
thing.
That's
all
I've
got
on
that.
Over
to
you,
Dan,
I
think.
Hi,
thanks
everybody
for
the
questions
and
thanks
for
Tim
for
the
topic
tonight.
Can
you
help
me
close
the
meeting
using
the
Serenity
Prayer?
God,
Trinity
sets
of
things.
I
cannot
change
things.
I
can
the
wisdom
to
know
the
difference.