The topic of step 2 at a Sponsorship through the 12 steps workshop in London, UK
There
we
go,
cats
out
of
the
bag
now.
So
anyway,
for
the
recording,
Tim
Alcoholic.
So
with
with,
we're
gonna
be
talking
about
Step
2.
There
are
three
ways
around
Step
2.
There's
the
shortest
way
round.
There's
the
short
way
round.
Then
there's
the
long
way
round.
Now
we
can't
get
away
from
the
fact
that
we've
got
the
big
book.
There
it
is.
It's
there,
it's
published.
It's
too
late.
If
we
were
going
to,
if
you
or
I
were
going
to
object
to
being
published,
we'd
have
to
go
back
to
19381939,
object
to
it
then.
But
we
can't
do
that,
so
we're
stuck
with
it.
So
that's
what
we
got.
That's
the
long
way
round.
So
We're
Agnostics
is
our
long
chapter.
It
may
not
be
the
longest
chapter,
but
it's
a
bit
like
February
is
the
longest
month,
or
at
least
it
feels
like
it.
We
Agnostics
feels
like
the
longest
chapter
to
me
and
honestly,
with
a
lot
of
responses
you
try
and
take
them
through.
We're
Agnostics.
By
the
time
you
got
to
the
end
that
87
times
as
confused
as
they
were
when
they
started.
So
what
I'm
going
to
present
is
like
the
Super
short
way
round
and
then
a
short
way
around.
Then
we're
going
to
go
through
the
chat
and
say
how
I
use
the
chapter.
So
the
shortest
way
around,
I'm
going
to
use
a
word
Kippur.
It's
what,
well,
my
father
would
have
said,
if
you're
effed,
you
say
I'm
not.
I
don't
want
to
say
the
word
effed
in
its
full
forms.
I'm
going
to
say
kippered
instead.
So
if
you
you
say
to
the
newcomer
or
the
person
that's
in
trouble,
you're
clippered.
Step
one
says
you're
kippered.
You're
kippered
when
it
comes
to
alcohol.
You're
kippered
when
it
comes
to
everything
else.
Look
around
your
Home
group.
Look
at
Susan
and
Clive
and
Bobby
and
and
Albert.
Well,
they
used
to
be
kippered
and
now
they're
not.
If
you
do,
if
you
do
what
they
did,
you'll
get
what
they
got,
which
is
they
were
unkippered
by
the
program.
So
look,
they're
sober
and
they're
having
a
nice
time.
Do
you
want
to
be
sober?
Yes.
Do
you
have
a
nice
time?
Yes.
Or
you
do
what
Susan,
Clive
and
Bobby
did,
and
that's
basically
all
that
step
falls
down
to.
In
essence,
it
completely
bipartisan.
All
of
that
sort
of
nonsense
about
the
higher
power
and
all.
My
first
step
too,
was
very
much
like
that.
All
Doug
said
to
me
was
the
only
thing
you
need
to
know
about
the
higher
power
is
you're
not
it,
which
means
you
submit
the
process
and
everything
else
takes
care
of
itself.
What
am
I
praying
to?
You
don't
need
to
know,
you
just
need
to
do
it.
What's
prayer?
You
say
the
words
and
mean
them.
God,
please
help
me
do
this.
And
then
you'll
get
given
direction.
You'll
get
given
strength.
How
do
you
know
you
get
given
direction?
A
useful
thought
comes
into
your
mind,
like
call
your
sponsor,
go
to
work,
go
to
a
meeting,
keep
your
mouth
shut.
You
know,
useful
things
like
that.
Direction
does
not
come
in
the
form
of
a
fax
from
God.
So
hey,
this
is
from
God.
It
comes
in
the
form
of
inspiration,
intuitive
thought
or
a
decision.
It
looks
like
your
own
thinking.
But
if
you
if
you
look
at
the
clothes
label
on
it,
you
will
actually
discover
that
it's,
you
know,
it's
coming
from
a
higher
place.
So
that's
the
that's
the
quickest
way
around.
And
if
someone
is
not
really
taking
on
board
much
information,
then
that's
a
really
good
way
of
doing
it.
Don't
be
wrong
footed
by
sponsees
who
are
sober
for
several
decades,
or
have
postgraduate
degrees
or
other
signs
of
external,
you
know,
worldly
competence.
Some
people
scrub
up
really,
really
well.
But
in
practice,
they
can
know
no
more
take
on
board
information
than
a
completely
rattled
newcomer
who's
two
days
off
the
drink.
If
someone
is
very
unwell,
they're
very
unwell,
and
that
effects
everything.
Sometimes
their
shortest
way
around
you
think
it
would
be
reserved
for
the
people
who
are
still
basically
coming
off
DTS.
Sometimes
you
have
to
reserve
it
for
the
people
who
are,
as
my
friend
Tom
says,
educated
beyond
their
intelligence
level.
And
as
Don
Pritz
said
to
Joe
Hawk,
you
know
enough
about
recovery
to
kill
yourself
and
others.
Too
much
information
can
be
as
much
of
a
problem
as
too
little.
So
that's
why
the
short
way
round
is
super
helpful.
Now
a
slightly
longer
way
round
this
is
so
this
is
that
was
the
shortest
way
round.
I'm
going
to
do
the
short
way
round
now,
which
is
which
basically
covers
the
ideas
in
Wii
agnostics,
but
in
a
broken
down
form
and
without
all
the
long
words,
without
the
prosaic
steel
girders
and
other
choice
quotations.
So
this
is
how,
if
I
have
to
present
Step
2
in
a
little
more
depth,
but
without
going
through
the
chapter,
this
is
how
I'll
do
it.
My
mind
is
broken.
It
sometimes
wants
to
drink.
Drinking
is
a
bad
idea.
If
I
obey
my
mind,
I'm
in
trouble.
So
I
need
to
obey
something
else.
Let's
call
that
thing
God.
And
that's
where
you
bring
other
people
in,
you
know,
is
it?
Is
that
going
to
work?
Well,
Sue
does
what
her
higher
power
wants,
and
Sue's
sober.
Clive
does
what
his
once
and
he's
sober.
And
this
is
where
you
bring
in
other
people's
experience.
You
say,
have
you
heard,
you
know,
these
people
share
at
the
Home
group
and
you
know,
the
sponsor
says
yes.
And
do
you
agree
that
Sue
and
Bobby
and
everyone
else
were
completely
powerless
over
alcohol
when
they
were
drinking?
They
had
no
choice
but
to
drink.
And
when
they
drank,
they
had
no
choice
but
to
drink
buckets.
Yeah,
that's
definitely
the
case.
The
way
you
drink.
Is
it
like
the
way
they
drink?
Yeah,
yeah,
yeah.
I
drink
like
them.
I
drink
like
them.
OK,
So
we
just
established
you
are
like
Sue
and
Clive
and
Bobby
and
Albert.
Great.
We've
established
that
you've
got
the
same
condition.
Are
they
sober
now?
I
think
so.
No,
no,
no.
We
can't
be
mushy
about
this.
Are
they?
So,
yeah,
they're
sober
now.
So
they
have
acquired
power
that
they
didn't
have.
And
that's
what
a
higher
power
means.
It's
a
power
greater
than
your
best
efforts.
So
they've
they've
got
a
higher
power
now.
Don't
worry
about
God,
they've
got
a
higher
power.
They've
got
a
power
they've
got
access
to
a
power
they
didn't
have
access
to
before.
Now
this
power,
let's
see,
let's
put
you
in
the
ring
with
this
power.
Can
you
keep
Susan
and
Bobby
and
Albert
and
Clive?
So
no.
Well,
in
that
case,
that
power
is
more
powerful
than
you
are.
It
can
keep
them
sober.
You
can't
keep
sue
sober,
but
it
can
keep
Sue
sober.
Therefore,
it's
not
just
a
power
greater
than
them,
it's
a
power
greater
than
you,
and
you've
just
tricked
the
person
into
admitting
that
there
is
a
power
greater
than
themselves.
In
admitting
that
there
is
a
power
greater
than
Sue,
and
that
they
are
not
greater
than
the
power
greater
than
Sue,
that
power
is
greater
than
them.
You
don't
have
to
invoke
any
arguments
about
the
higher
power
being
a
doorknob
or
the
number
9
bus.
My
friend
Melody
had
whales
as
her
higher
power.
We
thought
genuinely
that
it
was
the
principality
just
to
the
West
of
England.
And
it
wasn't.
It
was
actually
the
the,
the
aquatic
mammal,
the
way
she
she
like
she
lists,
had
tapes
of
whale
music
or
something.
And
I
think
there's
a
lot
in
that.
But
anyway,
what's
the
point?
The
point
is
you
don't
have
to
define
what
the
power
is.
You
have
to
look
at
the
effect
of
the
power.
Like
you
can't
see
the
wind
that
you
can
see
the
effect
of
the
wind
on
leaves,
on
trees.
And
that's
the
bit
that's
relevant.
So
when
people
try
to
get
all,
all
sort
of
scientific,
well,
I'm
scientific
so
I
can't
believe
in
God.
Well,
if
you're
really
scientific,
what
whatever
God
is,
whatever
is
keeping
them
sober,
that's
the
scientific
approach.
Something
is
keeping
them
so,
but
God
is
that
which
is
keeping
them
sober.
Tom
tells
a
very
good
story
about
a
woman
who
couldn't
get
her
handle
on
the
higher
power,
so
she
stayed
sober.
She
went
to
her
meeting,
she
got
a
sponsor,
she
did
some
steps
and
at
the
end
of
the
year
she
was
hoovering.
End
of
her
first
year,
she
was
hoovering
and
she
was
hoovering
around
this
green
chair
in
her
living
room.
And
that
green
chair
was
the
green
chair
she
sat
in
to
drink.
She
drank
in
that
chair
for
years,
watching
the
television,
and
she
realised
in
the
year
she'd
been
sober
she'd
not
sat
in
the
green
chair.
And
so
she
concluded,
My
higher
power
is
that
which
keeps
me
out
of
the
green
chair.
It
needn't
be
any
fancier
than
that.
The
higher
power
is
what
keeps
me
out
of
the
green
chair.
And
then
you
universalize
it.
You
say
what?
Well,
if
this
power
can
keep
everyone
else
sober,
you
have
to
presume
it's
going
to
work
for
everyone.
If
10
people
switch
a
kettle
on
and
it
boils,
if
you
switch
the
kettle
on,
do
you
think
it's
going
to
boil?
Or
do
you
think
the
kettle
is
going
to
respond
differently
to
you
switching
it
on
because
you
got
like
special
magic
fingers
or
something?
Now
you
have
to
presume
it's
going
to
work
for
everyone
and
prove
otherwise.
Rather,
I
don't
know
if
it'll
work
for
me.
Logic
would
say
no.
If
it
works
for
a
gazillion
people,
it'll
work
for
a
gazillion
plus
one,
and
that's
enough
to
get
someone
through
Step
2
without
having
to
touch
the
chapter
We
agnostics.
I'm
going
to
run
through
WE
agnostics
with
some
quotations
on
what
I
do
with
them.
So
first
of
all,
it
defines
this
is
on
page
44.
It
defines
alcoholism.
It
says
if
when
you
honestly
want
to,
you
find
you
cannot
quit
entirely,
or
if
when
drinking
you
have
little
control
over
the
amount
you
take,
you're
probably
alcoholic.
If
that
be
the
case,
you
may
be
suffering
from
an
illness
which
only
a
spiritual
experience
will
conquer.
And
the
conclusion
there
is
you
and
I
owe
Spawn
C
and
I
have
a
problem.
With
no
solution
within
ourselves,
how
do
we
know
what
we've
done?
Step
one,
we've
established
that
we
can't
stay
sober
on
our
own.
Next
bit
to
be
doomed
to
an
alcoholic
death
or
to
live
life
on
a
spiritual
basis
and
not
always
easy
alternatives
to
face.
Now
what
the
book
is
saying
here
is
there
are
two
options.
You
either
basically
die
of
alcoholism
or
die
without
die
without
active
alcoholism
or
you
throw
yourself
fully
into
the
program.
Now
this
is
an
important
point
here,
which
is
there
is
no
third
way.
A
lot
of
people
think
they
can
mess
around
for
months
or
years
safely
by
doing
like,
you
know,
47%
of
what
a
A
has
to
offer
and
somehow
remain
safe,
but
that's
just
not
true.
So
you've
got
to
get
clear
those
are
the
only
two
the
only
safe
option
other
than
alcoholic
drinking
is
full
throttle
A
A
next
passage.
There's
a
passage
which
starts
off
if
a
mere
code
of
morals
are
a
better
philosophy
of
life
was
sufficient
to
overcome
alcoholism,
many
of
us
would
have
recovered
long
ago.
And
then
it
goes
on.
The
point
of
that
paragraph
that
I
make
is
so
we
got
a
problem,
we
got
a
solution.
The
problem
is
not
lack
of
information.
You've
got
the
information
that
a
drink
is
a
is
a
really,
really
bad
idea
and
that
you
can
never
drink
safely,
but
that
information
is
not
enough
to
keep
you
sober.
If
that
were
enough
to
keep
you
sober,
we'd
all
only
need
1A,
a
meeting
ever,
and
then
we'd
be
fixed.
If
information,
if
lack
of
information
is
not
the
problem,
what
is
the
what
is
the
problem?
And
then
the
book
tells
us
that
this
chapter
is
actually
very
well
structured,
but
can
take
a
bit
of
work
to
pull
the
structure
out
of
it.
So
the
next
quotation,
the
passage
which
starts
lack
of
power,
that
was
our
dilemma.
So
information
is
necessary,
but
you
need
power.
And
the
image
that
I
use
with
this
is
if
you
want
to
make
a
soup,
it's
no
good
tipping
the
ingredients
into
a
saucepan.
You
need
heat
to
cook
the
ingredients.
So
that's
like
information
and
powering.
So
the
the
information
doesn't
actually
really
do
anything
without
the
power
behind
it.
What
is
power?
The
ability
to
implement
an
idea.
Let's
say
the
idea
is.
I
wouldn't
bother
worrying
about
that.
If
you
can't
do
it
about
it,
there's
no
point
in
worrying
about
it.
That
information
is
not
enough
to
get
rid
of
all
of
your
anxiety
forever.
You
now
have
all
the
information
you
need
to
stop
worrying
for
the
rest
of
your
life,
but
you'll
probably
discover
you
need
a
little
bit
of
power
to
actually
implement
that.
So
we've
decided
we've
got
a
problem.
We
don't
have
a
solution.
The
problem
is
not
lack
of
information.
The
problem
is
lack
of
power.
This
at
this
point
the
sponsee
says,
But
I
don't
believe
in
God
or
I
don't
like
God
or
I'm
a
recovering
Catholic
or
just,
you
know,
the
usual,
the
usual
things.
The
books
argument
at
this
point
is
very
clever.
It
says
it's
a
matter
of
willingness.
So
it
sidesteps
all
of
the
arguments.
And
so
we
have
to
understand
what
is,
what
is
willingness?
It's
the
it's
willingness
is
the
state
of
mind
which
immediately
precedes
action.
So
if
you're
willing,
what
you'll
have
to
be
willing
to
do
is
to
give
this
experiment
a
go,
which
means
to
act
as
if
there
is
a
higher
power
that
can
keep
you
sober
and
you
take
the
action
first,
and
that
will
convince
you
in
a
way
that
no
argument
can.
There's
a
little
trick
I
get
from
A
Course
in
Miracles
to
help
someone
that's
super
resistant
and
it
goes
like
this.
Stage
1.
This
is
when
I'm
resistant.
This
is
what
I
do.
I
don't
like
how
I
feel
now.
Now
I
may
still
be
super
resistant
to
an
actual
solution,
but
I
at
least
I
can
admit
how
I
feel
right
now
sucks.
Great,
next.
So
that's
point
number
one.
I
don't
like
how
I
feel
now
point
#2
So
I
hope
I've
been
wrong.
I
hope
I'm
wrong.
If
I'm
not
wrong,
I'm
really
kippered
as
I'm
going
to
be
unhappy
forever,
so
I
hope
I've
been
wrong.
What
flows?
And
that
is
#3
So
I
don't
like
how
I
feel,
number
one.
Number
two,
I
hope
I've
been
wrong
#3
I
would
like
a
different
way
to
look
at
this.
It
doesn't
say
that
there
is
one.
But
if
I
hope
I've
been
wrong,
just
the
notion
I
might
be
wrong
implies,
well,
there
is
a
right.
So
I
hope
there
is
a
different
way
to
look
at
this.
Four.
Maybe
there
is
a
different
way
to
look
at
this.
I
go
from
hope
to
speculation.
Maybe
there
is
a
different
way
of
looking
at
this.
5th
What
can
I
lose
by
asking
so
I
don't
like
I
feel
now
I
hope
I've
been
wrong.
I
would
like
a
different
way
to
look
at
this.
Maybe
there
is
a
different
way
to
look
at
this.
What
can
I
lose
by
asking
that
can
just
crack
the
door
open
the
next
point.
So
it's
hard
to
proceed
with
willingness,
with
the
action
without
any
notion
of
a
higher
power.
So
this
is
where
the
book
says,
much
to
our
relief,
we
discover
we
didn't
need
to
consider
another's
conception
of
God.
Now
that's
a
very
clever
line
because
what
that
means
is
whatever
God
you
decide
you
don't
believe
in,
maybe
you
know
some
version
of
the
God
you
think
you
were
taught
about
as
a
child
or
whatever,
or
what
some
what
society
is
telling
you
God
is.
You
can
totally
disregard
that.
You
don't
need
to
argue
against
those
conceptions
of
God.
You
can
just
throw
them
out
and
then
you
start
with
a
blank
piece
of
paper.
So
my
higher
power
is
whatever
is
keeping
my
sponsor
sober.
Let's
start
with
that.
Whatever
is
keeping
people
in
my
Home
group,
whatever
power
of
goodness
flows
through
the
universe.
I
mean,
there
are
100
ways
of
doing
it,
but
you
start
with
a
blank
sheet
that
you
rip
up
everything
you
think
you
know
and
start
with
a
blank
sheet
of
paper
and
go
with
one
idea
that
you
can
work
with.
And
there,
as
I
said,
there
are
lots
of
different
ideas.
And
at
the
very
least,
I
don't
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
have
a
person
as
a
higher
power,
even
a
dead
person
or
indeed
the
a
a
group.
And
he's
because
The
thing
is,
you
don't
have
access
to
the
a,
a
group
24
hours
a
day.
You
do
have
access.
Whatever
is
keeping
the
people
in
your
Home
group
sober.
How
about
have
that?
And
then
you've
you've
it's
a
just
a
very
subtle
distinction,
but
then
you've
got
something
that
you
can
rely
on
24
hours
a
day.
The
next
question
in
the
big
book,
again,
I
think
this
is
very
clever.
It
says,
do
I
now
believe
or
am
I
even
willing
to
believe
that
there
is
a
power
greater
than
myself?
Note,
it
doesn't
ask
you
to
believe
in,
it
asks
you
to
believe
that
there
is
one.
Like
you
can
believe
that
the
Conservative
Party
exists
without
believing
in
the
Conservative
Party.
These
are
two
entirely
different
questions.
So
is
there
a
power
greater
than
myself?
Is
simply
answered,
well,
there
is
a
power
keeping
other
people
sober,
and
that
power
is
doing
something
I
couldn't
do
to
those
people.
I
can't
keep
them
sober,
but
it's
keeping
them
sober.
So
it's
more
powerful
than.
So
you've
now
demonstrated
that
there
is
a
power
greater
than
yourself.
And
that's
how
the
chapter
breaks
down.
It
separates
out
the
question
of
is
there
a
power
from?
Could
that
power
help
me?
Next,
there's
a
whole
passage
about
being
handicapped
by
obstinacy,
sensitiveness,
and
unreasoning
prejudice.
And
it
it's
a
long
passage.
I'm
not
going
to
read
out
all
these
passages,
but
I'm
doing
them
in
order.
Basically
what
the
book
is
saying
is
alcohol
is
a
great
persuader.
Which
means
you
don't
have
to
persuade
them.
Often
it
will
require
a
slip
or
seven
slips
before
someone
is
willing
to
basically
discard
everything
they
think
they
know
and
just
try
on
a
new
idea
for
size.
The
next
difficult
bit
or
the
next
part
of
this
process
is
why
should
we
believe
that
this
power
exists?
And
it,
it
gives
the
example,
it's
what
we've
already
talked
about
the
other
people
in
a,
A
and
there's
a
whole
long
passage
about
this.
What
does
it
say?
Here
are
thousands
of
men
and
women
worldly?
Indeed,
they
flatly
declare
that
since
they
have
come
to
believe
in
a
power
greater
themselves,
to
take
a
certain
attitude
towards
that
power
and
to
do
certain
simple
things,
there
has
been
a
revolutionary
change
in
their
way
of
living
and
thinking.
So
you
take
the
example
of
people
in
a
a
as
demonstration
that
there
is
a
power.
There's
next
in
the
book,
there's
this
appeal
to
open
mindedness
and
it
talks
about,
and
it's
a
very
long
section,
but
about
how
open
minded
people
are
about
new
ideas
with
technology.
And
if
you're,
if
an
old
piece
of
technology
doesn't
work,
then
how
ready
people
are
to
try
a
new
piece
of
technology
in
the
hope
that
it's
going
to
work
better.
And
then
it
says,
well,
look
how
messed
up
you
are,
the
bedevilment
section.
And
there's
a
line
which
is
very
misunderstood,
was
not
a
basic
solution
of
these
bedevilments
more
important
than
whether
we
should
see
newsreels
of
lunar
flight?
Of
course
it
was.
Now
this
is
just,
it's
very
rarely
talked
about
that
line.
But
I
think
what
it's
saying
is,
look,
if
you're
willing
to
be
super
open
minded
about
the
new
Bluetooth
headset
and
you're
willing
to
pay
£30
for
a
new
type
of
headset
you've
never
tried
before,
which
may
fail
because
you
hope
that
your
phone
calls
will
be
clearer
when
you
buy
it,
that
you've
got
the
capacity
for
open
mindedness,
this
is
a
matter
far
more
important
than
your
Bluetooth
headset.
So
how
about
you
show
the
same
open
mindedness
with
spiritual
matters
that
you're
that
you
show
with
material
things?
That's
what
that
passage
is
about.
And
there's
a
little
summary
line
where
which
basically
pulls
together
everything
we've
done
so
far
on
the
chapter.
And
it
says
when
we
saw
others
solve
their
problems
by
simple
reliance
upon
the
spirit
of
the
universe.
So
Sue's
in
a
good
mood
this
week
after
she's
been
praying.
We
had
to
stop
doubting
the
power
of
God.
Our
ideas
did
not
work.
In
other
words,
you're
jiggered.
But
the
God
idea
did.
Look,
Susan,
a
good
mood.
Sue's
doing
better
than
you,
and
she
believes
in
God.
Next,
it
talks
about
the
role
of
logic,
and
I
think
this
is
important.
People
sometimes
think
in
Step
2
that
they're
being
asked
to
believe
something
or
do
something,
which
runs
against
logic,
and
the
book
is
saying
the
absolute
opposite.
And
it's
completely
reasonable
to
think
that
if
a
gazillion
people
take
certain
actions
and
their
lives
are
transformed,
that
it
will
work
for
you
too.
That
doesn't
require
some
leap
of
faith.
That
requires
accurate
observation
and
trusting
people's
stories
about
what
happened
to
them.
But
there's
one
element
where
faith
is
required,
and
it's
this.
It's
and
this
is
the
difficult
shift.
You
can
speculate
that
what
works
for
Susie
and
Bobby
will
work
for
me.
I
can
speculate
that,
but
I
can't
prove
it
in
advance
because
I
haven't.
If
I
haven't
taken
the
action
yet,
it's
unproven.
And
faith
is
the
courage
to
take
the
actions
based
on
that
logic
and
speculation.
So
again,
it's
like
if
you
jumping
off
a
diving
board,
100
people
jump
off
a
diving
board
into
a
pool
below
and
they're
all
fine.
Now
you
stand
on
the
diving
board
and
it
looks
rather
different.
I
don't
like
water
very
much.
I
don't
like
my
head
going
underwater
and
I
don't
like
heights.
This
is
because
I'm
a
coward.
Very
happy
to
admit
that
and
I'm
weak
minded
now.
There's
no,
there's
no
absolute
guarantee
that
you're
going
to
be
OK.
And
if
1000
people
jump
off
the
diving
board,
there's
no
guarantee
that
you're
going
to
be
OK.
But
it's
a
reasonable
assumption.
It
uses
that
phrase
in
the
chapter,
a
reasonable
assumption.
Faith
is
jumping
off
the
diving
diving
board.
It's
taking
the
action
based
on
the
on
the
logic,
the
speculation,
the
reasonable
assumption.
So
the
the
logic
will
get
you
99%
of
the
word
way
there
that
you
need
that
tiny
leap
of
faith,
which
is
the
faith
to
take
the
action.
It
also
talks
about
the
universality
of
the
higher
power.
Either
God
is
or
he
isn't.
Either
there
is
a
power
which
effects
people's
lives
or
there
is
not.
Either
there
is
a
people
are
getting
sober
randomly
or
there
is
some
system
involved.
If
there
is
a
system
involved,
it's
a
universal
system.
You
go
to
any
group
for
long
enough
and
you'll
see
people
of
different
intelligence
levels,
different
education
levels,
different
people
who
are
smart
in
different
ways.
There
are
lots
of
different
ways
of
being
smart.
Everyone's
smart
in
a
different
way.
And
it's
not
like
the
program
only
works
for
one
type
of
person.
If
you
listen
carefully,
you'll
hear
all
sorts
of
different
people
getting
it.
You'll
hear
people
you
don't
like
very
much
getting
sober
and
getting
well.
You'll
hear
people
you
disagree
with
on
everything
getting
sober
and
the
people
you
agree
with
on
everything
getting
sober.
So
it's
universal.
God
is
either
everything
or
God
is
nothing.
It
talks
about
then
the
book
talks
about
the
capacity
for
faith.
So
faith
is
being
willing
to
take
an
action
despite
there
being
no
guarantees.
I
look
at
the
faith
it
It
asks
you
to
look
at
the
faith
in
your
own
reason
and
if
you've
ever,
well,
if
you're
like
me,
you've
made
lots
of
mistakes
in
your
life
based
on
your
own
assessment
of
situations.
Yet
do
you
not
go
to
your
own
mind
for
answers
again
and
again
and
again,
even
though
your
mind
has
failed
you
before?
So
the
ability
to
put
faith
in
something
to
take,
to
take
it
action,
to
take
a
step
without
a
guarantee
of
success.
You
know,
as
a
drinker,
certainly
towards
the
end
it
was
like
Russian
roulette.
Sometimes
it
was
great,
sometimes
it
was
ghastly,
but
I
had
the
faith
to
take
the
action
of
having
the
first
drink,
trusting
that
it
might
be
OK
this
time.
That
is
faith.
So
you
can
pretty
much
demonstrate
if
you
manage
to
carry
on
drinking
in
the
faith
in
the
face
of
the
dwindling
pleasure
of
it,
the
increasing
side
effects,
then
you
have
the
capacity
for
faith.
This
is
simply
pointing
an
existing
faculty,
this
capacity
for
faith
in
a
new
direction
which
is
at
the
program.
See,
this
is
what
you
want
to
demonstrate
to
people,
that
you
already
have
the
capacity
for
faith.
You
just
need
to
point
it
in
the
direction
of
a,
A
and
then
it's
it.
Now
it
talks
about
the
inherent
nature
of
God
consciousness.
It
says
deep
down
and
every
man,
woman
and
child
is
the
fundamental
idea
of
God.
Some
people
will
connect
to
that.
Honestly,
a
lot
of
people
won't.
And
if
you,
if
they
don't
connect
the
idea
of
God
being
deep
down
inside
them,
then
you
can't.
You
can't
argue
it.
There
are
lots
of,
there
are
lots
of
passages
in
this
chapter
that
I
have
to,
I
skip
over
quite
lightly
because
they
just
don't
work
for
a
lot
of
people.
There
are
bits
of
step
one.
There
are
certainly
bits,
you
know,
all
of
step
three
through
to
12.
I,
I
wouldn't
take
the
risk
of
arguing
with
any
of
it.
There's
lots
of
what's
in
this
chapter
and
this
is
important,
I
think.
So
if
people
rebel
against
lots
of
bits
of
this
chapter,
let
them.
It's
fine
if
they
rebel
against
step
through
or
step
forward.
There's
not
a
lot
you
can
do
because
your
your
your
fooling
with
essential
parts
of
the
engine
with
Step
2.
If
you
can
get
them
through
the
chat,
great.
If
they
hate
the
chapter.
I
hated
the
chapter
for
the
1st
15
years
of
being
sober
so
I
have
sympathy
for
people
that
hate
the
chapter.
I
got
around
it
another
way,
which
is
why
I
gave
you
the
two,
the
two
other
methods
at
the
beginning.
At
the
end
of
the
chapter
there's
a
little
summary,
and
this
covers
the
whole
of
the
chapter,
really.
Circumstances
made
him
willing
to
believe.
He
humbly
offered
himself
to
his
maker.
Then
he
knew.
So
that's
the
order
in
which
this
takes
place.
The
reason
I'm
willing
to
throw
myself
at
the
mercy
of
a
power
grace
for
myself
is
because
I
literally
have
no
other
choice.
And
then
you
take
the
action.
And
when
you
take
the
action,
you
discover
that
it
works.
And
here's
there's
a
great
promise.
When
we
drew
near
to
him,
he
disclosed
himself
to
us.
And
I
started
praying
in
around
August
1993
because
I
literally
had
no
other
choice.
I
kept
wanting
to
drink,
and
for
a
few
months
in
a
eight
people
and
meetings
were
sufficient
to
talk
me
out
of
it.
By
the
time
we
got
to
August
1993,
I
was
finally
a
month
sober.
Everyone's
arguments
failed.
Like
whatever
it
was
inside
me
had
grown
to
such
an
extent
that
it
was
impervious
to
the
arguments
of
other
people,
even
the
great
grandy's
of
my
Home
group,
and
certainly
in
purpose
to
the
meetings
themselves.
And
so
I
needed.
I
tried
prayer,
as
I
literally
had
no
other.
There
was
no
other
card
to
play.
And
I
prayed.
And
the
damn
thing
worked.
The
desire
to
drink
at
that
moment
just
left
me
that
it
wasn't
even
a
prayer
for
sobriety.
I
opened
the
Bible
and
there
was
a
line.
Be
still
and
know
that
I
am
God.
Now
I'm
lucky
because
it
could
have
opened
at
a
page
about
the
smiting
of
the
Amalekites
or
some
Paul
talking
about
how
long
people's
hair
should
be.
But
no,
it
opened
on
the
page
about
Be
still
and
know
that
I'm
God.
But
it
did
I
I
think
honestly,
it
wouldn't
have
mattered
where
it
opened.
The
fact
I
took
the
action,
I
opened
the
book
and
read
the
line
and
that
was
enough
to
open
the
channel
and
something
in
me
clicked
and
I
thought,
I
don't
need
to
drink.
Damn,
that
means
I
never
need
to
drink
again.
I
now
have
something
that
can
be
relied
on.
Damn,
I'm
going
to
have
to
be
sober
now.
I
was
really
disappointed
and
relieved
at
the
same
time.
So
circumstances
made
me
willing
to
believe.
I
humbly
offered
myself
to
the
higher
power
and
then
something
happened.
And
it
says
he
knew.
Knowledge
is
something
which
you
can't
argue
with
perception
you
can.
But
knowledge
is
deeper.
And
that's
the
point.
People
start
to
take
action
and
they
have
knowledge
which
can't
be
dislodged
by
arguments.
All
the
arguments
they've
had
for
decades
that
are
thrown
out
of
window
then.
So
anyway,
that's
everything
I
know
about
everything,
so
I'm
gonna
stop
there.
And
Alistair,
do
you
want
to
feel
field
some
questions?
Thanks.
Thanks
a
lot,
Tim.
Yeah,
the
meeting
is
now
open
for
questions
for
Tim,
which
can
be
done
by
the
raised
hand
function
in
Zoom
or
you
can
message
me
through
the
chat
function
and
I'll
ask
Tim
directly
or
I
will
send
you
the
message
Tim
and
save
me
asking
the
question,
then
you
having
to
repeat
it
for
the
tape
or
if
all
else
fails
just
way
violently
at
the
camera.
And
I
will,
I
will
try
and
get
to
you
and
I'll
open
it
up
for
questions.
John,
you
waving?
Yeah,
I've
got
a
question
at
the
risk
of
sounding
really
dumb,
So
in
the
book,
where
does
step
two
start
at
Wignostics
or
just
before
it?
Okay,
so
the
question,
as
I
said
earlier,
I'm
going
to
be
repeating
the
questions
for
the
sake
of
the
the
backup
tape.
So
where
does
step
two
start?
It's
not
a
dumb
question
because
the,
the
table
of
contents
in
the
book,
uh,
does
not
reveal
where
each
the
steps
are.
I
don't
know
if
that's
on
purpose
to
make
you
read
it
so
that
you
can't
like
skip
to
a
particular
step,
but
it's
so
at
the
beginning,
it
doesn't
say
where
step
one
starts,
but
it
does
say,
oh,
well,
this
is
step
one.
Like
in
the
middle
of
step
one,
it
says
this
is
the
first
step
in
recovery.
Once
you
start
getting
to
the
higher
steps,
it
says
we're
now
at
step
three.
We're
now
at
step
four.
We're
now
at
Step
5,
so
We
Agnostics
is
basically
your
chapter
for
Step
2.
But
I'd
say
that
this
is
the
reason
why
it's
not
a
silly
question
at
all.
The
first
paragraph
of
Weird
Gnostics
is
actually
the
summing
up
of
step
one.
So
step
one
leaks
over
into
the
first
paragraph
of
We
Agnostics
and
then
that
forms
the
basis
for
Step
2.
And
then
also
that
itself
leaks
over
into
so
between
page
58
and
60,
there's
like
a
little
pause
where
it
sums
up
where
we've
been
and
tells
us
where
we're
going
and
it
re
basically
checks
one
more
time.
Are
you
sure
you've
got
Step
2?
So
there's
some
Step
2
stuff
between
page
58
and
60
as
well.
But
you
can
I
kind
of
cover
that
once
I
get
there.
So
maybe
if
if
this
happens
next
week,
I'll
be
covering
the
beginning
of
how
it
works
and
then
all
the
way
through
to
Step
3.
What
people
might
want
to
consider
are
situations
with
Swansea's
in
the
past
where
things
have
got
really
complicated
or
sticky
in
Step
2,
because
that
might
form
the
basis
for
good,
good
questions.
OK,
thanks.
Another
question,
Tim.
So
based
on
what
you
just
said
there,
so
you
know,
you
know
like
how
it
works
and
the
actor
and
all
that
because
that's
all
written
before
it
says
we
were
now
at
step
three,
didn't
it?
But
that
would
be
Step
3.
Let's
just
explaining
about
it.
Is
it
well,
I
OK,
so
a
little
question
about
that.
How
does
the
actor
stuff
fit
in
one?
One
of
our
difficulties
with
the
steps
is
the
steps
on
the
wall
or
on
page
59
or
on
the
wall
scrolls
that
we
hang
up
in
meetings
don't
fully
match
what's
in
the
book.
So
like
step
10
on
the
wall,
we
continue
to
take
personal
inventory.
Looks
like
we
keep
doing
step
fours
on
on
things.
And
then
you
look
at
the
instructions
in
the
book
and
it's
about
maintaining
awareness
throughout
the
day.
It's
like
completely
not
what
you'd
expect.
And
step
three
is
actually
like
that
as
well.
So
there
are,
by
the
time
you
get
to
the
ABC's,
let
me
just
get
the
book
down,
I
don't
have
the
book
memorized.
You
need
to
know
that
Saskia
always
says,
I'm
so
glad
they
wrote
this
down
and
I
think
she's
right.
So
it
says
on
page
60
that
three
personal
ideas
that
we
were
alcoholic
and
could
not
manage
our
own
lives,
that
probably
no
human
power
could
have
relieved
our
alcoholism,
that
God
could
and
would
if
he
was
sought.
Now
at
this
point
your
sponsee
is
supposed
to
be
like
totally
up
for
turning
their
well
and
life
over
to
God.
You'd
think
that
the
next
thing
in
the
book
would
be
right
though.
This
is
how
you
take
step
three
and
say,
wait
a
minute,
if
you're
going
to
be
turning
your
will
in
your
life
over
to
a
power
greater
than
yourself.
Like
you're
down
with
the
idea
that
with
regard
to
alcohol,
that's
a
really
good
idea,
but
the
sponsee
may
not
yet
be
totally
sold
on
the
idea
that
everything
else
is
a
little
bit
of
a
problem
as
well.
So
in
like
in
the
a,
a
fellowship,
the
fact
that
everything
else
is
a
mess
is
brought
into
step
one.
So,
so
people
try
and
squeeze
all
of
that
stuff
into
the
unmanageability
in
step
one.
The
big
book
doesn't
say
anything
about
that.
It
hints
at
it
in
Wagnostics
and
then
it
goes
full
force
in
step
three
on.
Since
you're
already
going
to
be
turning
your
weather
life
over
to
God,
wouldn't
it,
wouldn't
it
just
be
easier
for
everyone
if
you
are
down
with
the
idea,
if
you
didn't
have
any
like
emotional
resistance
to
it?
So
you
then
that's
when
you
got
the
two
pages
on
the
actor,
hopefully
to
persuade
someone
to
take
step
three
on
the
basis
that
it's
good
for
them
as
well.
It's
not
just
for
the
drink.
It
will
improve
everything
else
as
well.
So
it's
not,
these
are
good
questions
because
it
the
book
isn't
terribly
straightforward
with
these
early
steps.
It
kind
of
jumps
back
and
forth
and
things
are
not
in
the
place
you
expect
them
to
be
either.
All
right,
Thanks.
What
we
could
do,
Alistair,
is
if
we've
got
oh,
we've
got
a
question
from
Claire.
Thank
you.
Thanks,
Tim.
That's
fantastic.
And
this,
there
are
so
many
questions
about
Step
2,
but
one
thing
that
comes
to
mind
is
in
the
past,
I've
made
the
mistake
of,
of
getting
a
little
bit
modelled
about,
about
when
I
see
a
new
person.
And
so
they,
they
get
sober
and
then,
and
then
they
have
the
new
boyfriend,
the
new
job,
dramatic
change
of
appearance
and,
and
you
know,
doing
a
lot
of
fellowship.
I've
made
the
mistake
of
believing
these,
these
things
in
the
material
world
have
become
the
higher
power
for
the
individual.
And
it's,
it's
all
that
they're
doing.
And,
and
I
think
at
what
point.
So,
so
if
I
have
a
sponsee,
at
what
point
do
you
just
just
leave
that
alone
and
allow
it
and,
and,
and
not
judge
too
quickly
that
in
the
place
of
a
higher
power,
you're
choosing
the
boyfriend,
you're
choosing
the
job.
Because
it
seems
that
when,
when
there's
a
shift
away
from
alcohol.
The
energy
is
invested
then
into
into
the
things
around
them.
And
and
I
sometimes
feel
like
it's
a
bit
quick,
quick
for
me
to
say
don't
stop
doing
that
or
try
to
look
at
that.
Does
that
make
sense
as
a
question?
Yeah.
So
I
think
what
this
speaks
to
is
how
you
sponsor,
how
you
can
help
people
and
there
by
yourself,
you
know,
so
whenever
I'm
helping
someone
else,
it's
only
ever
really
to
it
helps
me
as
much
as
it
helps
them.
So
whatever
I
need
to
say
to
someone
else
or
I
feel
I
need
to
say
to
someone
else
is
what
my
higher
power
wants
me
to
be
saying
to
me.
This
is
the
question
of
Step
2.
With
the
rest
of
your
life
like
later
on
in
recovery
or
people
who
are
251015203030
years
sober.
What
does
Step
2
mean
in
those
situations
when
you
talk
about
making
external
things
your
higher
power.
A
very
good
definition
of
pride
is
the
putting
of
self
in
the
place
of
God
as
the
centre
or
main
objective
of
one's
life.
Now,
if
you're
focused
on
establishing
a
good
romantic
relationship
and
maintaining
a
a
desirable
household
and
pursuing
an
impressive
career,
this
doesn't
look
as
though
you're
engaged
in
self
because
it
well,
it
doesn't
look
as
though
it's
about
you.
It
looks
as
though
it's
about
external
things.
But
those
external
things
are
totally
tied
up
in
my
identity.
My
my
identity,
my
value,
my
purpose,
who
I
am,
what
I'm
worth
and
why
I'm
here.
And
what
step
three
is
asking
me
to
do
is
to
have
my
who
I
am
child
of
God,
whatever
that
means,
my
value
stemming
from
that.
So
I'm
of
infinite
value
because
I
exist.
And
what
is
my
purpose?
To
be
a
channel
for
God
to
do
whatever
God
wants
to
do
through
my
life
in
the
universe,
as
opposed
to
those
those
things,
those
external
things,
being
the
central
main
objective
of
my
life.
A
very,
might
I
say,
vanishingly
small
percentage
of
AAS
in
my
experience.
Totally.
By
the
idea
that
the
solution
to
alcoholism
lies
in
complete
abandonment
of
self,
at
least
the
first
time
round.
I
think
to
stay
permanently
sober,
the
idea
has
got
to
be
bought
at
some
point.
My
experience
and
frankly
the
experience
of
most
people
is
that
what
what
you
need
to
do
this
is
that
that
your
basic
pattern
you
get
sober,
you
discover
after
a
few
months,
weeks,
days
or
minutes
that
just
go
into
meetings
is
not
enough.
So
you
get
a
sponsor
and
you
get
the
idea.
It
seems
very
clear
that
if
you
clear
up
your
past
and
if
you
submit
the
good
orderly
direction
of
A
A
and
sensible
people
around
you
and
you
achieve
emotional
balance,
you're
frankly
going
to
do
a
lot
better
in
your
relationship,
in
your
household,
in
your
job.
So
it's
not
that
it's
not
true
that
those
things
will
improve,
but
those
are
byproducts
of
the
process.
They're
not
on
purpose
of
the
process,
but
that's
very
bewitching
as
you,
I'm
sure
if
you
go
to
meetings,
I
hear
it
as
well.
People
say
God
has
been
very
good
to
me
because
and
then
they
list
all
of
the
external
things
they've
bought
or
achieved
in
the
world.
A
friend
of
mine
says
sometimes
we
say
if,
if
you
have,
if
you
want
what
we
have.
And
then
everyone
looks
out
to
the
parking
lot
outside
to
see
what
cars
people
have
got.
I
think
Bob
D
talks
about
this
notion
if
we
have
what
you
want.
While
my
sponsee
look,
he
said
my
sponsee
looked
at
my
wife
and
said
I'll
have
that.
And
he
did.
You
know,
if
you
want
what
we
have
can
be
taken
to
a
absurd
extremes.
So
what
happens
is
you
work
the
program
well
and
everything
gets
better
and
you
think,
aha,
that's
the
point
of
it.
And
then
you
hear
someone
say
that
blessed
phrase,
a
bridge
to
normal
living.
Now
that's
sort
of
if
you
want
to
know
where
that
comes
from,
it
comes
from
an
extraordinarily
good
pamphlet
called
A
Member's
Eye
View
of
Alcoholics
Anonymous.
It
was
a
transcript
of
notes
for
a
talk
done
by
an
A,
a
member
at
an
external
organization.
And
this,
the
image
of
a
bridge
to
normal
living
is
actually
a
very
complex
image,
which
can
only
be
understood
in
the
in
the
context
of
that
pamphlet.
And
it's
not
really
generally
applicable.
It's
not
a
very
tight
metaphor,
but
the
way
it
gets
used
by
people
is
to
say,
well,
of
course,
you
know,
the
first
few
years
of
a
A,
you
have
to,
you
know,
go
to
lots
of
meetings
and
do
the
steps.
But
really
you
don't
want
to
turn
a
A
into
another
crutch.
And
surely
the
whole
point
of
a
A
is
to
get
reintegrated
back
into
society.
So
you
need
to,
you
know,
we'll
leave
the
little
ones
to
do,
to
do
the
service.
You
know,
I've
done
my
stint.
I
don't
need
to
do
anymore.
That's
what
most
people
do.
And
I'm
not
blaming
them.
I
did
it
because
it's
what
everyone
is
doing.
A
lot
of
people
are
doing.
Then
what
happens?
Somewhere
between
7
and
10
years,
It's
usually
around
there.
Some
people
hit
it
early,
some
people
hit
it
later,
but
it's
generally
between
7:00
and
10:00.
You
develop
a
tiny
little
problem
with
gambling
or
massage
parlours
or
toxic
relationships
or
sugar
or
exercise,
or
you
discover
yourself
so
high-powered
in
your
job
that
you're
way
out
of
your
depth
and
you
have
no
idea
how
to
get
out
of
it.
And
then
everything
collapses
and
people
either
drink
and
never
come
back,
or
they
hopefully
if
they
catch
it
in
time,
they'll
be
the
so-called
second
surrender.
When
you
really
adopt
the
program
as
it's
set
out
and
you
actually
buy
it,
you
do
service
rather
than
lip
service.
But
it
it's
just
like
the
first
time
you
do
Step
2,
the
first
time
you
do
Step
2
is
largely
about
drinking.
It's
essentially
about
drinking.
The
second
time
you
do
it,
it's
a,
it's
a
much
harder
sell
actually,
because
you
look
around
a
A
and
basically
everyone
is
sober.
I
mean,
some
people
look
kind
of
funky
because
of
some
medication
they're
on,
but
at
least
they're
sober
and
they're
not
taking,
you
know,
heroin
or
something.
So,
you
know,
there's
a
spectrum
there.
But
basically
people
are
sober.
Whereas
if
you're
8
years
sober
and
you
want
to
look
around
your
room
for
your
A,
a
room
for
how
many
people
around
you
are,
let's
say
over
10
years
sober
and
don't
need
to
be
arrested
this
week.
It's
not
that
many
people
that
aren't
that
many
examples
of
people
who
are
doing
super
well
who
are
sober
a
long
time.
So
Step
2,
can
God
really?
And
also
people's
drinking
problems
look
really
similar?
Or
drink
a
bottle
of
vodka
a
day?
So
do
I,
so
do
I,
as
everyone
echoes
around
the
room.
Whereas
people's
problems
at
7
to
10
years
sober
look
weirdly
specific.
And
so
people
look,
they
said,
well,
I,
I
don't
know
anyone
that's
overcome
this
particular
problem
in
their
intimate
relationship
with
whoever
or
I
don't
know
anyone
that's
been
the
finance
director
of
a.com.
I
your
problems
look
super
specific.
And
this
is
where
if
you're
trying
to
get
someone
through
that,
you
look
at
the
common,
the
commonality
of
the
seven
areas
of
self
pride.
Are
you
consumed
with
pride?
What
other
people
think
about
you,
self
esteem,
what
you
think
about
yourself,
personal
and
sex
relations,
how
other
people
treat
you,
ambitions
what
you
want,
security,
what
you
need
and
pocketbooks
your
money.
Are
you
obsessed
with
those
things?
Yes.
So
it's
not
about
the
specific
form
that
these
are
taking,
it's
about
the
content,
which
is,
yeah,
Fuller
self
as
I
was.
And
then
you
have
you
kind
of
have
to
introduce
often
you
have
to
introduce
people
to
other
people,
you
know,
from
other
groups
on
other
other
areas
who've
got
through
this
and
come
out
the
other
side.
Scott
Peck,
whom
I
haven't
read
but
apparently
wrote
a
book
called
The
Road
Less
Travelled.
It's
a
great
title.
And
I
understand
people
talk
about,
you
know,
the
the
path
being
the
road
less
travelled.
And
I
think
that's,
that's
your
cell
the
second
time
around.
Now,
if
you've
got
someone
to
go
specifically
to
your
question,
Claire,
of
if
you've
got
someone
who's
like
1-2,
three
years
sober
and
all
the
focus
is
going
on
external
things,
you
can
try
and
tell
people
that.
As
Maureen
once
said
to
me,
she
said
trying
to
give
people
advice
in
a
a
or
guidance
that
they
haven't
asked
for
or
even
when
they
ask
for
guidance.
That's
the
weird
thing.
You'd
think
if
people
ask
for
guidance,
they
listen
to
it,
but
generally
they're
either
resist
it
or
they
agree
with
it
so
quickly
that
it
bounces
off
and
doesn't
actually
go
in.
And
then
that
like
they're
happy
because
they've
got
a
solution,
but
they've
agreed
with
it
so
quickly
that
they
haven't
got
a
chance
to
implement
it.
And
then,
you
know,
three
weeks
later,
same
question.
But
she
said
trying
to
give
people
advice
or
guidance,
it's
like
shouting
at
a
14
year
old
who
is
skateboarding
next
to
the
edge
of
a
Cliff
wearing
headphones.
It's
a
great
image.
If
you
want
to
find
her,
she
goes
to
meetings
in
Rains
Park.
Good
old,
good
old
Maureen.
She's
very,
very
funny.
She
was
the
one,
I
hope
I'm
not
out
saying
anything
out
of
turn
and
saying
this.
I
had
a
very
tricky
sponsee
a
number
of
years
ago
that
took
a
that
took
objection
to
a
lot
of
what
I
was
offering.
And
she
said
what
you
need
to
do
is
say
to
this
individual,
I
don't
think
I'm
the
right
person
to
sponsor
you.
And
as
you
send
her
off
into
the
night
and
walk
away
in
the
other
direction,
do
not
mutter
under
your
breath.
And
I
can't
imagine
who
would
be
the
right
person.
Yeah,
if
Maureen
said
we
should
have
a
session
called,
Maureen
said
that
could
be
our
whole
hour.
Maureen
said
if
they
want
the
solution,
you
can't
say
anything
wrong.
If
they
don't
want
it,
you
can't
say
anything,
right.
So
you
can
kind
of,
you're
doing
your
job
by
saying,
honey,
you
might
want
to
watch
that.
Like
the
80
hour
weeks
and
the
Netflix
binging
and
the
like
half
a
meeting.
You
might
want
to
watch
that.
But
they
won't
listen.
So
don't
nag
because
it
doesn't
work
and
you
haven't
got
time.
What
you
can
do,
you
don't
necessarily
need
to
wait
for
them
to
get
to
7
to
10
years
because
although
it's
seven
to
10
years,
the
wheels
come
off.
The
wheels
are
going
to
start
squeaking
pretty
soon.
And
what
you
can
do
if
the
if
the
basic
text
bits,
the
big
book
is
not
working.
What
you
can
do
the
exercise
is
to
get
them
to
go
through
The
Pioneers
stories
at
the
back
of
the
book
one
a
day
and
pull
out
every
general.
So
those
stories
have
got
a
problem
section
and
a
solution
section
like
before
I
got
to
a
A
after
I
got
to
a
A,
you
get
them
to
pull
out
quote
by
quote
each
line
which
establishes
a
general
principle
of
how
a
a
works
and
then
to
say,
how
can
you
apply
this
in
your
life?
And
people
find
that
completely
revelatory.
There's
a
lot
of
stuff
in
there
which
deepens
and
human
and
personalizes
the
very
dry
principles,
say
between
60
and
62.
So
that's
a
very
good
exercise
which
can
soften
people
up.
The
other
thing
as
well
is
if
you,
if
they
sponsor
other
people,
they'll
see
their
insanity
reflected
in
other
people.
And
that,
well,
that's
the
only
thing
which
keeps
me
sane.
It's
not
like
fancy
Course
in
Miracles
stuff,
although
I
do
do
that
as
well.
It's
having
like
a
gazillion
sponsee
calls
a
day
thinking,
Oh
my
God,
this
person
is
completely
mad
and
just
like
me.
And
then
the
next
one,
Oh
my
God,
this
one's
completely
mad.
And
just
like
me,
you
know,
it's
not
they're
completely
mad
and
I'm
sensational.
It's
complete.
If
they
show
me
what
is
wrong
with
me
and
I
go
up,
oh,
I'm
in
trouble.
So
I
think
that's,
that's
how,
that's
the
only
way
you
can
help
people.
But
if
people
are
on
the
way
out,
you
can't
stop
them.
So
don't
feel
guilty
or
responsible
for
that.
You
you
put
out
the
little,
little
sorcerer
of
water
for
the
hedgehog,
but
you
don't
stand
over
try
to
force
the
hedgehog
to
drink
it
because
it
doesn't
work.
That's
all
I've
got
on
on
that.
Thanks,
Tim.
Alistair
Alcoholic,
can
I
jump
in
with
a
question?
You're
working
with
the
sponsor,
you
work
through
step
one,
you've
worked
Step
2.
You're
getting
to
that
point
of
of
how
it
works
and
get
into
Step
3
and
relapse
occurs.
They
may
or
may
not
have
fixed
ideas.
Invariably
they
do
have
pretty
fixed
ideas
about
what
their
higher
power
is.
They
come
back
and
say,
oh,
I've
relapsed.
But
you
know,
I,
I,
you
know,
I
think
my
Step
2
is
in
place.
You
know,
I
have
my
higher
power,
etcetera,
etcetera,
but
I've
relapsed.
What
do
you
do?
What
do
you
do
in
that
situation?
OK,
so
maybe
relapse
might
be
a
whole
session,
like
how
you
deal
with
relapsing
sponsors
could
win.
But
the
short
answer
is
this.
I
think
it
always,
I
don't
think
it
really.
It
very,
very
rarely
boils
down
to
Step
2
or
Step
3
relapse.
It
almost
always
boils
down
to
step
one.
It's
basically
then
there's
going
to
be
a
reservation
about
some
aspect
of
alcoholism.
So
maybe
the
person
isn't
done
drinking,
they're
still
part
of
them.
That
genuinely
buys
the
idea
that
a
drinking
life
will
be
better.
There
can
be
reservations.
So
that's
like
a
step
zero
thing.
Are
you
really
done?
Then
you
can
have
the
people
can
have
a
reservation
about
the
physical
craving.
So
maybe
there
is
a
way
of
controlling
the
amount.
They
can
have
a
reservation
about
the
mental
obsession,
which
is
now
I've
got
the
information
that's
enough
to
keep
me
sober.
I
don't
need
a
spiritual
awakening.
My
mind
isn't
fundamentally
broken.
It's
fundamentally
sound.
I've
just
put
the
missing
jigsaw
puzzle
piece
in
and
now
I'm
fine.
Even
if
people
believe
that
they're
doomed
by
their
alcoholic
mind
to
drink,
and
once
they
drink,
they're
doomed
to
drink
buckets,
a
lot
of
people
will
calculate
the
cost
of
a
slip
and
conclude
that
it's
somehow
worth
it,
because
if
it
gets
bad
enough,
I
can
come
back.
But
that's
a
fallacy.
Just
because
you've
come
back
a
dozen
times
doesn't
mean
the
next
time
it's
going
to
be
different.
Because
when
Doctor
Jekyll
turns
into
Mr.
Hyde,
Mr.
Hyde
doesn't
turn
back
into
Doctor
Jekyll
as
an
act
of
the
will,
just
the
potion
wears
off.
Mr.
Hyde
does
not
want
to
become
Doctor
Jekyll
again.
And
one
day
the
potion
ain't
gonna
wear
off.
So
that's
why
there's
no
such
thing
as
a
safe
slip.
19
out
of
20
cases.
I
think
with
sponsees
who
slip,
it's
because
there's
a
reservation.
They
think
they
can
get
away
with
a
bit
more
drinking
before
they
buckle
down.
Once
you
know
you're
that
if
you
really
believe
that
your
mind
is
so
nuts
it
could
induce
you
to
have
a
drink,
and
that
you
might
literally
never
come
back
and
suffer
horrible
pain
for
the
next
30
or
40
years.
If
you
if
you
genuinely
believe
that,
then
Step
2
stops
being
a
problem
and
step
three
stop
string
problem.
I
think
it's
all
down
to.
It's
all
down
to
step
one
is.
That's
the
short
answer.
Although
there's
lots
of
very,
there
are
lots
of
variations
on
that
theme.
Does
anyone
else
have
a
question
for
Tim
on
this
topic?
Susie?
Hi,
Thanks,
Tim.
Thanks
everybody.
I
don't
know
if
you
can
answer
this
in
short,
but
how
do
I
get
to
a
place
where
I
really
really
believe
that
God
is
everything
or
God
is
nothing?
It's
like
and
nothing
in
between.
I
I,
I
So
the
question
is,
how
do
you
get
to
a
point
where
you
believe
that
God
is
everything,
not
nothing,
and
that
there's
nothing
in
between?
Um,
the
question
is
very
abstract,
so
it
needs
to
be
made
concrete
to
be
answered.
Chuck
Chamberlain
does
this
very
well
in
a
new
pair
of
glasses,
which
is
available
if
you
can't
find
it
from
Smile
God
Loves
You,
which
is
a
website
where
they
sell
a,
a
stuff,
I
think
it's
called
Smile
God
Loves
You,
something
like
that.
If
you
look
it
up
on
there,
you'll
better
get
it
for
like
$5
or
something,
plus
like
$47
postage
to
whatever
country
you
live
in.
What
he
says
in
there
is
if
I
have
one
problem
that
can't
be
solved,
then
I
might
as
well
just
jump
off
a
bridge.
Now
if
there
is
one
problem
that
can't
be
solved
or
accepted,
it's
going
to
sit
there
like
a
pane
inside
me
for
the
rest
of
my
life.
So
I
would
make
it
very
concrete.
So
believing
that
God
is
everything
means
that
there
is
no
problem
which
cannot
be
solved
practically
or
accepted
cheerfully
and
gracefully.
So
there
are
some
things.
I've
got
a
couple
of
physical
things
wrong
with
me
which
can't
be
fixed.
And
I've,
I've
accepted
them
and
I
shouldn't
be
able
to,
but
I
have.
And
so
that's,
that's
how
you
do,
you
look
at
the
practical
level.
Why
do
I
think
God
can't
provide
me
with
a
practical
or
spiritual
solution
to
this?
And
it's
very
hard
to
argue
against
the
universality
of
God
then,
because
if
you
go
to
enough
meetings,
you'll
find
someone
who's
had
that
problem.
Or
I
mean,
especially
if
you
go
to
old
timers
meetings,
you'll,
you'll
see
every
year
a
number
of
people
who
are
sober
twenty,
30-40
years
who
have
cancer,
sometimes
die
of
cancer
and
remain
full
of
grace
throughout
the
whole
thing.
It's
like,
you
know,
what
is
commonly
cited
as
like
the
worst
thing
that
can
happen
is
something
you
see
people
living
through
or
the
death
of,
of,
of
close
relatives,
which
is
something
I've
lived
through
as
well.
So
I
think
that's
the
art.
That's
how
I
come
at
that
question
myself.
Anyone
else?
I
think
it's
probably
about
time
to,
but
if
I
could
hand
it
over
to
you,
back
to
you,
Tim,
to
close
out
with
the
Serenity
Prayer.
Thank
you.
Would
you
please
help
me
close
with
the
Serenity
prayer?
God
grant
me
the
serenity,
except
the
things
I
cannot
change.
Courage
change
things
I
can,
and
the
wisdom
to
know
the
difference.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thanks,
Jim.